Analysis of Film Cooling and Full-Coverage Film Cooling of Gas Turbine Blades

1984 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. G. Eckert
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Solid Surface ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Turbine Blades ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
Gas Turbine Blades ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Cooling Air

Film cooling has become a standard method for the protection of the skin of gas turbine blades against the influence of the hot gas stream. The cooling air is usually injected into the boundary layer covering the skin through one or two rows of holes. A calculation method to predict heat transfer to the skin of a film cooled wall based on two parameters—the film effectiveness and a heat transfer coefficient defined with the adiabatic wall temperature—has been widely accepted. More recently, those sections of a turbine blade skin requiring intensive cooling are covered over its entire area with holes through which cooling air is ejected. A different method to predict the temperature of this section by this “full coverage film cooling” has been proposed which is based on two different parameters θ and K. The air used for the cooling of the perforated section of the skin also provides protection to a solid section located downstream in the normal film cooling process. The two methods are reviewed, and it is discussed under what conditions and in which way results obtained with one method can be transformed to the parameters used in the other one. Published data [8, 9] are used to calculate film cooling effectiveness values and Stanton numbers based on the adiabatic wall temperature for a perforated wall and a solid surface downstream of 11 rows of holes with coolant injection. The results demonstrate the advantage of this method which has been shown in previous experiments with ejection through one or two rows of holes, for film cooling of a solid surface. For full-coverage film cooling, there is still the advantage that a heat transfer coefficient defined with the adiabatic wall temperature is independent of temperature difference within the restrictions imposed by the superposition model.

scholarly journals An Investigation of Treating Adiabatic Wall Temperature as the Driving Temperature in Film Cooling Studies

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Ting Wang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
Temperature Potential ◽  
Driving Potential

In film cooling heat transfer analysis, one of the core concepts is to deem film cooled adiabatic wall temperature (Taw) as the driving potential for the actual heat flux over the film-cooled surface. Theoretically, the concept of treating Taw as the driving temperature potential is drawn from compressible flow theory when viscous dissipation becomes the heat source near the wall and creates higher wall temperature than in the flowing gas. But in conditions where viscous dissipation is negligible, which is common in experiments under laboratory conditions, the heat source is not from near the wall but from the main hot gas stream; therefore, the concept of treating the adiabatic wall temperature as the driving potential is subjected to examination. To help investigate the role that Taw plays, a series of computational simulations are conducted under typical film cooling conditions over a conjugate wall with internal flow cooling. The result and analysis support the validity of this concept to be used in the film cooling by showing that Taw is indeed the driving temperature potential on the hypothetical zero wall thickness condition, ie. Taw is always higher than Tw with underneath (or internal) cooling and the adiabatic film heat transfer coefficient (haf) is always positive. However, in the conjugate wall cases, Taw is not always higher than wall temperature (Tw), and therefore, Taw does not always play the role as the driving potential. Reversed heat transfer through the airfoil wall from downstream to upstream is possible, and this reversed heat flow will make Tw > Taw in the near injection hole region. Yet evidence supports that Taw can be used to correctly predict the heat flux direction and always result in a positive adiabatic heat transfer coefficient (haf). The results further suggest that two different test walls are recommended for conducting film cooling experiments: a low thermal conductivity material should be used for obtaining accurate Taw and a relative high thermal conductivity material be used for conjugate cooling experiment. Insulating a high-conductivity wall will result in Taw distribution that will not provide correct heat flux or haf values near the injection hole.

scholarly journals Computation of Full-Coverage Film-Cooled Airfoil Temperatures by Two Methods and Comparison With High Heat Flux Data

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Gladden ◽  
F. C. Yeh ◽  
P. J. Austin
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Superposition Method ◽  
High Heat Flux ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
Full Coverage

Two methods were used to calculate the heat flux to full-coverage film cooled airfoils and, subsequently, the airfoil wall temperatures. The calculated wall temperatures were compared to measured temperatures obtained in the Hot Section Facility operating at real engine conditions. Gas temperatures and pressures up to 1900 K and 18 atm with a Reynolds number up to 1.9 million were investigated. Heat flux was calculated by the convective heat transfer coefficient adiabatic wall method and by the superposition method which incorporates the film injection effects in the heat transfer coefficient. The results of the comparison indicate the first method can predict the experimental data reasonably well. However, superposition overpredicted the heat flux to the airfoil without a significant modification of the turbulent Prandtl number. The results of this research suggests that additional research is required to model the physics of full-coverage film cooling where there is significant temperature/density differences between the gas and coolant.

A Transient Infrared Thermography Method for Simultaneous Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficient Measurements From a Single Test

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinath V. Ekkad ◽  
Shichuan Ou ◽  
Richard B. Rivir
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Liquid Crystal ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Infrared Thermography ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Initial Model ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

In film cooling situations, there is a need to determine both local adiabatic wall temperature and heat transfer coefficient to fully assess the local heat flux into the surface. Typical film cooling situations are termed three temperature problems where the complex interaction between the jets and mainstream dictates the surface temperature. The coolant temperature is much cooler than the mainstream resulting in a mixed temperature in the film region downstream of injection. An infrared thermography technique using a transient surface temperature acquisition is described which determines both the heat transfer coefficient and film effectiveness (nondimensional adiabatic wall temperature) from a single test. Hot mainstream and cooler air injected through discrete holes are imposed suddenly on an ambient temperature surface and the wall temperature response is captured using infrared thermography. The wall temperature and the known mainstream and coolant temperatures are used to determine the two unknowns (the heat transfer coefficient and film effectiveness) at every point on the test surface. The advantage of this technique over existing techniques is the ability to obtain the information using a single transient test. Transient liquid crystal techniques have been one of the standard techniques for determining h and η for turbine film cooling for several years. Liquid crystal techniques do not account for nonuniform initial model temperatures while the transient IR technique measures the entire initial model distribution. The transient liquid crystal technique is very sensitive to the angle of illumination and view while the IR technique is not. The IR technique is more robust in being able to take measurements over a wider temperature range which improves the accuracy of h and η. The IR requires less intensive calibration than liquid crystal techniques. Results are presented for film cooling downstream of a single hole on a turbine blade leading edge model.

Adiabatic Wall Temperature and Heat Transfer Downstream of Injection Through Two Rows of Holes

1978 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Y. Jabbari ◽  
R. J. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Investigation ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Single Row ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

Results of an experimental investigation of film cooling and heat transfer following injection through two staggered rows of holes are reported. The two staggered rows are considerably more effective in protecting the wall than a single row. The film cooling effectiveness at locations beyond about 30-hole dia downstream of injection is laterally uniform. The heat transfer coefficient is within a few percent of that without injection at low blowing rates, but it increases rapidly as the blowing rate increases above unity.

scholarly journals An Investigation of Treating Adiabatic Wall Temperature as the Driving Temperature in Film Cooling Studies

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Ting Wang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
Temperature Potential ◽  
Driving Potential

In film cooling heat transfer analysis, one of the core concepts is to deem film cooled adiabatic wall temperature (Taw) as the driving potential for the actual heat flux over the film-cooled surface. Theoretically, the concept of treating Taw as the driving temperature potential is drawn from compressible flow theory when viscous dissipation becomes the heat source near the wall and creates higher wall temperature than in the flowing gas. But in conditions where viscous dissipation is negligible, which is common in experiments under laboratory conditions, the heat source is not from near the wall but from the main hot gas stream; therefore, the concept of treating the adiabatic wall temperature as the driving potential is subjected to examination. To help investigate the role that Taw plays, a series of computational simulations are conducted under typical film cooling conditions over a conjugate wall with internal flow cooling. The result and analysis support the validity of this concept to be used in the film cooling by showing that Taw is indeed the driving temperature potential on the hypothetical zero wall thickness condition, i.e., Taw is always higher than Tw with underneath (or internal) cooling and the adiabatic film heat transfer coefficient (haf) is always positive. However, in the conjugate wall cases, Taw is not always higher than wall temperature (Tw), and therefore, Taw does not always play the role as the driving potential. Reversed heat transfer through the airfoil wall from downstream to upstream is possible, and this reversed heat flow will make Tw > Taw in the near injection hole region. Yet evidence supports that Taw can be used to correctly predict the heat flux direction and always result in a positive adiabatic heat transfer coefficient (haf). The results further suggest that two different test walls are recommended for conducting film cooling experiments: a low thermal conductivity material should be used for obtaining accurate Taw and a relative high thermal conductivity material be used for conjugate cooling experiment. Insulating a high-conductivity wall will result in Taw distribution that will not provide correct heat flux or haf values near the injection hole.

A Transient Infrared Thermography Method for Simultaneous Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficient Measurements From a Single Test

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinath V. Ekkad ◽  
Shichuan Ou ◽  
Richard B. Rivir
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Liquid Crystal ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Infrared Thermography ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Single Test ◽  
Initial Model ◽  
Adiabatic Wall

In film cooling situations, there is a need to determine both local adiabatic wall temperature and heat transfer coefficient to fully assess the local heat flux into the surface. Typical film cooling situations are termed three temperature problems where the complex interaction between the jets and mainstream dictates the surface temperature. The coolant temperature is much cooler than the mainstream resulting in a mixed temperature in the film region downstream of injection. An infrared thermography technique using a transient surface temperature acquisition is described which determines both the heat transfer coefficient and film effectiveness (non-dimensional adiabatic wall temperature) from a single test. Hot mainstream and cooler air injected through discrete holes are imposed suddenly on an ambient temperature surface and the wall temperature response is captured using infrared thermography. The wall temperature and the known mainstream and coolant temperatures are used to determine the two unknowns (heat transfer coefficient and film effectiveness) at every point on the test surface. The advantage of this technique over existing techniques is the ability to obtain the information using a single transient test. Transient liquid crystal techniques have been one of the standard techniques for determining h and η for turbine film cooling for several years. Liquid crystal techniques do not account for non uniform initial model temperatures while the transient IR technique measures the entire initial model distribution. The transient liquid crystal technique is very sensitive to the angle of illumination and view while the IR technique is not. The IR technique is more robust in being able to take measurements over a wider temperature range which improves the accuracy of h and η. The IR requires less intensive calibration than liquid crystal techniques. Results are presented for film cooling downstream of a single hole on a turbine blade leading edge model.

scholarly journals Comparison of Two-Equation Turbulence Models for Prediction of Heat Transfer on Film-Cooled Turbine Blades

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay K. Garg ◽  
Ali A. Ameri
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Turbine Blades ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Computer Time ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

A three-dimensional Navier-Stokes code has been used to compute the heat transfer coefficient on two film-cooled turbine blades, namely the VKI rotor with six rows of cooling holes including three rows on the shower head, and the C3X vane with nine rows of holes including five rows on the shower head. Predictions of heat transfer coefficient at the blade surface using three two-equation turbulence models, specifically, Coakley’s q-ω model, Chien’s k-ε model and Wilcox’s k-ω model with Menter’s modifications, have been compared with the experimental data of Camci and Arts (1990) for the VKI rotor, and of Hylton et al. (1988) for the C3X vane along with predictions using the Baldwin-Lomax (B-L) model taken from Garg and Gaugler (1995). It is found that for the cases considered here the two-equation models predict the blade heat transfer somewhat better than the B-L model except immediately downstream of the film-cooling holes on the suction surface of the VKI rotor, and over most of the suction surface of the C3X vane. However, all two-equation models require 40% more computer core than the B-L model for solution, and while the q-ω and k-ε models need 40% more computer time than the B-L model, the k-ω model requires at least 65% more time due to slower rate of convergence. It is found that the heat transfer coefficient exhibits a strong spanwise as well as streamwise variation for both blades and all turbulence models.

High Resolution Heat Transfer Measurements on the Stator Endwall of an Axial Turbine

2014 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Laveau ◽  
Reza S. Abhari ◽  
Michael E. Crawford ◽  
Ewald Lutum
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Flow ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
Axial Turbine ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

In order to continue increasing the efficiency of gas turbines, an important effort is made on the thermal management of the turbine stage. In particular, understanding and accurately estimating the thermal loads in a vane passage is of primary interest to engine designers looking to optimize the cooling requirements and ensure the integrity of the components. This paper focuses on the measurement of endwall heat transfer in a vane passage with a three-dimensional (3D) airfoil shape and cylindrical endwalls. It also presents a comparison with predictions performed using an in-house developed Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver featuring a specific treatment of the numerical smoothing using a flow adaptive scheme. The measurements have been performed in a steady state axial turbine facility on a novel platform developed for heat transfer measurements and integrated to the nozzle guide vane (NGV) row of the turbine. A quasi-isothermal boundary condition is used to obtain both the heat transfer coefficient and the adiabatic wall temperature within a single measurement day. The surface temperature is measured using infrared thermography through small view ports. The infrared camera is mounted on a robot arm with six degrees of freedom to provide high resolution surface temperature and a full coverage of the vane passage. The paper presents results from experiments with two different flow conditions obtained by varying the mass flow through the turbine: measurements at the design point (ReCax=7.2×105) and at a reduced mass flow rate (ReCax=5.2×105). The heat transfer quantities, namely the heat transfer coefficient and the adiabatic wall temperature, are derived from measurements at 14 different isothermal temperatures. The experimental data are supplemented with numerical predictions that are deduced from a set of adiabatic and diabatic simulations. In addition, the predicted flow field in the passage is used to highlight the link between the heat transfer patterns measured and the vortical structures present in the passage.

scholarly journals Local Heat Transfer Coefficient and Adiabatic Wall Temperature Measurement Beneath Arrays of Staggered and Inline Impinging Jets

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth W. Van Treuren ◽  
Zuolan Wang ◽  
Peter T. Ireland ◽  
Terry V. Jones ◽  
S. T. Kohler
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Impinging Jets ◽  
Hole Diameter ◽  
Channel Height ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Target Plate ◽  
Adiabatic Wall

Recent work, Van Treuren et al. (1993), has shown the transient method of measuring heat transfer under an array of impinging jets allows the determination of local values of adiabatic wall temperature and heat transfer coefficient over the complete surface of the target plate. Using this technique, an inline array of impinging jets has been tested over a range of average jet Reynolds numbers (10,000–40,000) and for three channel height to jet hole diameter ratios (1, 2, and 4). The array is confined on three sides and spent flow is allowed to exit in one direction. Local values are averaged and compared with previously published data in related geometries. The current data for a staggered array is compared to those from an inline array with the same hole diameter and pitch for an average jet Reynolds number of 10,000 and channel height to diameter ratio of one. A comparison is made between intensity and hue techniques for measuring stagnation point and local distributions of heat transfer. The influence of the temperature of the impingement plate through which the coolant gas flows on the target plate heat transfer has been quantified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document