Blind Identification of Two-Channel IIR Systems With Application to Central Cardiovascular Monitoring

Author(s):  
Jin-Oh Hahn ◽  
Andrew T. Reisner ◽  
H. Harry Asada

This paper presents a new approach to blind identification of a class of two-channel infinite impulse response (IIR) systems with applicability to clinical cardiovascular monitoring. Specifically, this paper deals with a class of two-channel IIR systems describing wave propagation dynamics. For this class of systems, this paper first derives a blind identifiability condition and develops a blind identification algorithm, which is able to determine both the numerator and denominator polynomials of the channel dynamics uniquely. This paper also develops a new input signal deconvolution algorithm that can reconstruct the input signal from the identified two-channel dynamics and the associated two-channel measurements. These methods are applied to identify the pressure wave propagation dynamics in the cardiovascular system and reconstruct the aortic blood pressure and flow signals from blood pressure measurements taken at two distinct extremity locations. Persistent excitation, model identifiability, and asymptotic variance are analyzed to quantify the method’s validity, accuracy, and reliability without employing direct measurement of the aortic blood pressure and flow signals. The experimental results based on 83 data segments obtained from a swine subject illustrate how the cardiovascular dynamics can be identified accurately and reliably, and the aortic blood pressure and flow signals can be stably reconstructed from two distinct peripheral blood pressure signals under diverse physiologic conditions.

Author(s):  
Jin-Oh Hahn ◽  
Andrew T. Reisner ◽  
H. Harry Asada

This paper presents a new approach to blind identification of a class of 2-channel infinite impulse response (IIR) systems describing the wave propagation dynamics. For these systems, this paper derives a blind identifiability condition and develops a blind identification algorithm, which is capable of uniquely determining both the numerator and denominator polynomials of the channel dynamics. The efficacy of the method is illustrated by a 2-sensor central cardiovascular monitoring application as an example, where the cardiovascular blood pressure wave propagation dynamics is identified and the aortic signals are reconstructed from blood pressure measurements at two distinct extremity locations. Experimental results using a swine subject illustrate how the new blind identification approach effectively identifies cardiovascular dynamics and reconstructs the aortic blood pressure and flow signals very accurately from two distinct peripheral blood pressure measurements under diverse physiologic conditions.


Author(s):  
Nima Fazeli ◽  
Jin-Oh Hahn

In this paper, we present an innovative active non-intrusive system identification approach to cardiovascular monitoring. The proposed approach is based on a dual collocated actuator-sensor system for cardiovascular system identification, in which the actuators actively excite the arterial tree to create rich and informative trans-mural pressure waves traveling in the arterial tree, which are then non-intrusively measured by the collocated sensors. In our previous work, we developed a mathematical model to reproduce the propagation of intra-vascular (arterial) and extra-vascular (artificial) pressure waves along the arterial tree. Then, we used a dual (radial-femoral) blood pressure cuff system as a prototype dual collocated actuator-sensor system to demonstrate the proposed methodological framework to create rich trans-mural pressure waves as well as to non-intrusively reconstruct them from sensor measurements. In this follow-up work, we propose a novel system identification algorithm to derive cardiovascular system dynamics and reconstruct central aortic blood pressure waveform from the trans-mural pressure waves observed at the peripheral locations. It was successfully demonstrated that the system identification algorithm was able to reconstruct the central aortic blood pressure accurately, and that its performance was superior to the passive non-intrusive approach.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 378-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alper Erdan ◽  
Abdullah Ozkok ◽  
Nadir Alpay ◽  
Vakur Akkaya ◽  
Alaattin Yildiz

Background: Arterial stiffness is a strong predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate possible relations of arterial stiffness with volume status determined by bioimpedance analysis and aortic blood pressure parameters. Also, effects of a single hemodialysis session on these parameters were studied. Methods: A total of 75 hemodialysis patients (M/F: 43/32; mean age: 53 ± 17) were enrolled. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and aortic pulse pressure were measured by applanation tonometry before and after hemodialysis. Extracellular fluid and total body fluid volumes were determined by bioimpedance analysis. Results: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (9.30 ± 3.30 vs 7.59 ± 2.66 m/s, p < 0.001), augmentation index (24.52 ± 9.42 vs 20.28 ± 10.19, p < 0.001), and aortic pulse pressure (38 ± 14 vs 29 ± 8 mmHg, p < 0.001) significantly decreased after hemodialysis. Pre-dialysis carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was associated with age (r2 = 0.15, p = 0.01), total cholesterol (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.02), peripheral mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.10, p = 0.005), aortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.02), aortic pulse pressure (r2 = 0.14, p = 0.001), and extracellular fluid/total body fluid (r2 = 0.30, p < 0.0001). Pre-dialysis augmentation index was associated with total cholesterol (r2 = 0.06, p = 0,02), aortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.16, p < 0.001), and aortic pulse pressure (r2 = 0.22, p < 0.001). Δcarotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was associated with Δaortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.02) and inversely correlated with baseline carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (r2 = 0.29, p < 0.001). Pre-dialysis Δaugmentation index was significantly associated with Δaortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.09, p = 0.009) and Δaortic pulse pressure (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.03) and inversely associated with baseline augmentation index (r2 = 0.14, p = 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.46, p < 0.001) to determine the factors predicting Log carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, extracellular fluid/total body fluid and peripheral mean blood pressure significantly predicted Log carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p = 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusion: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and aortic pulse pressure significantly decreased after hemodialysis. Arterial stiffness was associated with both peripheral and aortic blood pressure. Furthermore, reduction in arterial stiffness parameters was related to reduction in aortic blood pressure. Pre-dialysis carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was associated with volume status determined by bioimpedance analysis. Volume control may improve not only the aortic blood pressure measurements but also arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document