Three-Dimensional Geometrical Characterization of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Image-Based Wall Thickness Distribution

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampaolo Martufi ◽  
Elena S. Di Martino ◽  
Cristina H. Amon ◽  
Satish C. Muluk ◽  
Ender A. Finol
Keyword(s):  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Geometrical Shape ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Elective Repair

The clinical assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk is based on the quantification of AAA size by measuring its maximum diameter from computed tomography (CT) images and estimating the expansion rate of the aneurysm sac over time. Recent findings have shown that geometrical shape and size, as well as local wall thickness may be related to this risk; thus, reliable noninvasive image-based methods to evaluate AAA geometry have a potential to become valuable clinical tools. Utilizing existing CT data, the three-dimensional geometry of nine unruptured human AAAs was reconstructed and characterized quantitatively. We propose and evaluate a series of 1D size, 2D shape, 3D size, 3D shape, and second-order curvature-based indices to quantify AAA geometry, as well as the geometry of a size-matched idealized fusiform aneurysm and a patient-specific normal abdominal aorta used as controls. The wall thickness estimation algorithm, validated in our previous work, is tested against discrete point measurements taken from a cadaver tissue model, yielding an average relative difference in AAA wall thickness of 7.8%. It is unlikely that any one of the proposed geometrical indices alone would be a reliable index of rupture risk or a threshold for elective repair. Rather, the complete geometry and a positive correlation of a set of indices should be considered to assess the potential for rupture. With this quantitative parameter assessment, future research can be directed toward statistical analyses correlating the numerical values of these parameters with the risk of aneurysm rupture or intervention (surgical or endovascular). While this work does not provide direct insight into the possible clinical use of the geometric parameters, we believe it provides the foundation necessary for future efforts in that direction.

Geometry Quantification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Shum ◽  
Elena Di Martino ◽  
Satish Muluk ◽  
Ender A. Finol
Keyword(s):  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Transverse Diameter ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Elective Repair ◽  
Segmented Images

Recent studies have shown that the maximum transverse diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and expansion rate are not entirely reliable indicators of rupture potential. We hypothesize that aneurysm morphology and wall thickness can be quantified in a systematic approach leading to accurate differentiation of the geometric characteristics of aneurysm population subsets. A non-invasive, image-based evaluation of AAA shape was implemented on a retrospective study of sixty-six subjects who underwent elective repair and twenty-eight subjects who suffered AAA rupture within 1 month of their last pre-operative follow-up. The contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans of these patients were used to generate three-dimensional models from the segmented images. Twenty-eight geometry-based indices were calculated to characterize the size and shape of the AAA sac, and regional variations in wall thickness were estimated based on a novel segmentation algorithm. A multivariate analysis of variance using a maximum AAA diameter of 5.5 cm as a factor was performed for all indices as dependent variables, for the electively repaired group. Box and Whisker plots and ROC curves were generated to determine the indices’ potential as predictors of rupture risk. Listed from highest to lowest area under the ROC curve (AUC), the following six indices were found statistically significant (p < 0.05): volume (V, p < 0.0001), surface area (S, p < 0.0001), intraluminal thrombus volume (VILT, p < 0.0001), diameter-to-diameter ratio (DDr, p < 0.0001), diameter-to-height ratio (DHr, p = 0.015), and centroid distance of the maximum diameter (dc, p = 0.008). Given that individual AAAs have complex, tortuous and asymmetric shapes with local changes in surface curvature and wall thickness, the assessment of AAA rupture risk should require the accurate characterization of aneurysmal sac shape.

Quantitative Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry and Rupture Potential

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Shum ◽  
Giampaolo Martufi ◽  
Elena S. DiMartino ◽  
Ender A. Finol
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Transverse Diameter ◽  
Geometrical Shape ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Elective Repair

Recent biomechanics studies have shown that the maximum transverse diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and its expansion rate are not reliable indicators of rupture potential. We hypothesize that geometrical shape and size, as well as wall thickness may be related to rupture risk and can therefore be deciding factors in the clinical management of the disease. A non-invasive, image-based evaluation of AAA size and geometry was implemented on a retrospective study of twenty subjects. The contrast enhanced, computed tomography (CT) scans of 10 patients who suffered AAA rupture within 1 month of the scan were compared to those of 10 patients who received elective repair. The images were segmented and three-dimensional models were generated. Twenty-eight geometry-based indices were calculated to characterize the size and shape of each AAA and regional variations in wall thickness were estimated. A multivariate analysis of variance was performed for all indices comparing the ruptured and non-ruptured data sets to determine which indices are statistically significant. Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the indices’ potential as predictors of rupture risk. In addition to maximum diameter, five other geometry-based indices were found to be statistically significant, with the minimum wall thickness being the best discriminator between ruptures and non-ruptured AAAs.

Aortic Lumen Area Is Increased in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Correlates to Biomechanical Rupture Risk

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 750-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antti Siika ◽  
Moritz Lindquist Liljeqvist ◽  
Rebecka Hultgren ◽  
T. Christian Gasser ◽  
Joy Roy
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Lumen Area ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vessel Area ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Risk Parameters

Purpose: To investigate how 2-dimensional geometric parameters differ between ruptured and asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and provide a biomechanical explanation for the findings. Methods: The computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of 30 patients (mean age 77±10 years; 23 men) with ruptured AAAs and 60 patients (mean age 76±8 years; 46 men) with asymptomatic AAAs were used to measure maximum sac diameter along the center lumen line, the cross-sectional lumen area, the total vessel area, the intraluminal thrombus (ILT) area, and corresponding volumes. The CTA data were segmented to create 3-dimensional patient-specific models for finite element analysis to compute peak wall stress (PWS) and the peak wall rupture index (PWRI). To reduce confounding from the maximum diameter, 2 diameter-matched groups were selected from the initial patient cohorts: 28 ruptured AAAs and another with 15 intact AAAs (diameters 74±12 vs 73±11, p=0.67). A multivariate model including the maximum diameter, the lumen area, and the ILT area of the 60 intact aneurysms was employed to predict biomechanical rupture risk parameters. Results: In the diameter-matched subgroup comparison, ruptured AAAs had a significantly larger cross-sectional lumen area (1954±1254 vs 1120±623 mm2, p=0.023) and lower ILT area ratio (55±24 vs 68±24, p=0.037). The ILT area (2836±1462 vs 2385±1364 mm2, p=0.282) and the total vessel area (3956±1170 vs 4338±1388 mm2, p=0.384) did not differ statistically between ruptured and intact aneurysms. The PWRI was increased in ruptured AAAs (0.80 vs 0.48, p<0.001), but the PWS was similar (249 vs 284 kPa, p=0.194). In multivariate regression analysis, lumen area was significantly positively associated with both PWS (p<0.001) and PWRI (p<0.01). The ILT area was also significantly positively associated with PWS (p<0.001) but only weakly with PWRI (p<0.01). The lumen area conferred a higher risk increase in both PWS and PWRI when compared with the ILT area. Conclusion: The lumen area is increased in ruptured AAAs compared to diameter-matched asymptomatic AAAs. Furthermore, this finding may in part be explained by a relationship with biomechanical rupture risk parameters, in which lumen area, irrespective of maximum diameter, increases PWS and PWRI. These observations thus suggest a possible method to improve prediction of rupture risk in AAAs by measuring the lumen area without the use of computational modeling.

Abstract 107: Increased Peak Wall Stress in Women With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Shang ◽  
Grace Wang ◽  
Ronald Fairman ◽  
Benjamin Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Aortic Wall ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Intraluminal Thrombus ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aortic Wall Thickness ◽  
Peak Wall Stress

Objective: Women with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) exhibit more rapid aneurysm growth and greater rupture risk at equivalent diameters relative to men. Evidence suggests that biomechanical peak wall stress (PWS) derived from finite element analysis of AAAs is a superior predictor of rupture compared to maximum transverse diameter (MTD). This study aimed to investigate differences in the calculated PWS of AAAs between men and women. Method: Men (n=35) and women (n=35) with infrarenal AAAs with 45-55mm MTD undergoing CTA were identified. Customized image processing algorithms extracted patient-specific AAA geometries from raw DICOM images. The resulting aortic reconstructions incorporated patient-specific and regionally resolved aortic wall thickness, intraluminal thrombus, and wall calcifications. Aortic models were loaded with 120mmHg blood pressure using commercially available FEA solvers. Results: Peak wall stress was found to be significantly higher in women (299±51 vs 257±53 kPA, P=0.001, see Figure). Neither MTD (50.5±3.1 vs 49.8±2.9 mm, P=0.34), mean aortic wall thickness (2.38±0.52 vs 2.34±0.50 mm, P=0.69), nor wall thickness at location of PWS (2.36±0.60 vs 2.20±0.46 mm, P=0.20) varied by sex. While there were no sex-associated differences in aneurysm volume (86.6±27.0 vs 94.8±25.5 cm 3 , P=0.76) or intraluminal thrombus volume (14.2±11.7 vs 16.3±13.4 mm, P=0.33), women’s AAAs had significantly increased maximum Gaussian curvature (0.032±0.011 vs 0.025±0.015 mm -2 , P=0.03). Conclusion: Comparably sized AAAs in women were shown to have significantly higher peak wall stress. Maximum gaussian curvature, a measure of aneurysm morphology, was significantly different between the two groups. These results suggest that men and women possess distinct aneurysm geometries, and that PWS-derived rupture risk prediction may provide a more reliable estimator of rupture risk in all patients.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Incorporating Pre-stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith H. C. Fonken ◽  
Esther J. Maas ◽  
Arjet H. M. Nievergeld ◽  
Marc R. H. M. van Sambeek ◽  
Frans N. van de Vosse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Structure Interaction ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Fluid Structure ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Currently, the prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) solely relies on maximum diameter. However, wall mechanics and hemodynamics have shown to provide better risk indicators. Patient-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations based on a non-invasive image modality are required to establish a patient-specific risk indicator. In this study, a robust framework to execute FSI simulations based on time-resolved three-dimensional ultrasound (3D+t US) data was obtained and employed on a data set of 30 AAA patients. Furthermore, the effect of including a pre-stress estimation (PSE) to obtain the stresses present in the measured geometry was evaluated. The established workflow uses the patient-specific 3D+t US-based segmentation and brachial blood pressure as input to generate meshes and boundary conditions for the FSI simulations. The 3D+t US-based FSI framework was successfully employed on an extensive set of AAA patient data. Omitting the pre-stress results in increased displacements, decreased wall stresses, and deviating time-averaged wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index patterns. These results underline the importance of incorporating pre-stress in FSI simulations. After validation, the presented framework provides an important tool for personalized modeling and longitudinal studies on AAA growth and rupture risk.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: From Clinical Imaging to Realistic Replicas

2013 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Ruiz de Galarreta ◽  
Aitor Cazón ◽  
Raúl Antón ◽  
Ender A. Finol
Keyword(s):  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Physiological Stress ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Casting Process ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Optical Methods ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

The goal of this work is to develop a framework for manufacturing nonuniform wall thickness replicas of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The methodology was based on the use of computed tomography (CT) images for virtual modeling, additive manufacturing for the initial physical replica, and a vacuum casting process and range of polyurethane resins for the final rubberlike phantom. The average wall thickness of the resulting AAA phantom was compared with the average thickness of the corresponding patient-specific virtual model, obtaining an average dimensional mismatch of 180 μm (11.14%). The material characterization of the artery was determined from uniaxial tensile tests as various combinations of polyurethane resins were chosen due to their similarity with ex vivo AAA mechanical behavior in the physiological stress configuration. The proposed methodology yields AAA phantoms with nonuniform wall thickness using a fast and low-cost process. These replicas may be used in benchtop experiments to validate deformations obtained with numerical simulations using finite element analysis, or to validate optical methods developed to image ex vivo arterial deformations during pressure-inflation testing.

Method for Incorporating Three-Dimensional Residual Stresses Into Patient-Specific Simulations of Arteries

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Pierce ◽  
Thomas E. Fastl ◽  
Hannah Weisbecker ◽  
Gerhard A. Holzapfel ◽  
Borja Rodriguez-Vila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Imaging ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Constitutive Models ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Model Geometry ◽  
Reconstructed Model

Through progress in medical imaging, image analysis and finite element (FE) meshing tools it is now possible to extract patient-specific geometries from medical images of, e.g., abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and thus to study clinically relevant problems via FE simulations. Medical imaging is most often performed in vivo, and hence the reconstructed model geometry in the problem of interest will represent the in vivo state, e.g., the AAA at physiological blood pressure. However, classical continuum mechanics and FE methods assume that constitutive models and the corresponding simulations start from an unloaded, stress-free reference condition.

Use of the Photoelastic Method to Determine the Wall Stress in Realistic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Models

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. Doyle ◽  
Anthony Callanan ◽  
John Killion ◽  
Timothy M. McGloughlin
Keyword(s):  
Wall Stress ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Western World ◽  
Photoelastic Method ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
The Us ◽  
Numerical Tools

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain a significant cause of death in the Western world with over 15,000 deaths per year in the US linked to AAA rupture. Recent research [1] has questioned the use of maximum diameter as a definitive risk parameter as it is now believed that alternative factors may be important in rupture-prediction. Wall stress was shown to be a better predictor than diameter of rupture [1], with biomechanics-based rupture indices [2,3] and asymmetry also reported to have potential clinical applicability [4]. However, the majority of numerical methods used to form these alternative rupture parameters are without rigorous experimental validation, and therefore may not be as accurate as believed. Validated experiments are required in order to convince the clinical community of the worth of numerical tools such as finite element analysis (FEA) in AAA risk-prediction. Strain gauges have been used in the past to determine the strain on an AAA [5], however, the photoelastic method has also proved to be a useful tool in AAA biomechanics [6]. This paper examines the approach using three medium-sized patient-specific AAA cases at realistic pressure loadings.

scholarly journals High-frequency murine ultrasound provides enhanced metrics of BAPN-induced AAA growth

2019 ◽  
Vol 317 (5) ◽  
pp. H981-H990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Romary ◽  
Alycia G. Berman ◽  
Craig J. Goergen
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Murine Model ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Peak Wall Stress

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), defined as a pathological expansion of the largest artery in the abdomen, is a common vascular disease that frequently leads to death if rupture occurs. Once diagnosed, clinicians typically evaluate the rupture risk based on maximum diameter of the aneurysm, a limited metric that is not accurate for all patients. In this study, we worked to evaluate additional distinguishing factors between growing and stable murine aneurysms toward the aim of eventually improving clinical rupture risk assessment. With the use of a relatively new mouse model that combines surgical application of topical elastase to cause initial aortic expansion and a lysyl oxidase inhibitor, β-aminopropionitrile (BAPN), in the drinking water, we were able to create large AAAs that expanded over 28 days. We further sought to develop and demonstrate applications of advanced imaging approaches, including four-dimensional ultrasound (4DUS), to evaluate alternative geometric and biomechanical parameters between 1) growing AAAs, 2) stable AAAs, and 3) nonaneurysmal control mice. Our study confirmed the reproducibility of this murine model and found reduced circumferential strain values, greater tortuosity, and increased elastin degradation in mice with aneurysms. We also found that expanding murine AAAs had increased peak wall stress and surface area per length compared with stable aneurysms. The results from this work provide clear growth patterns associated with BAPN-elastase murine aneurysms and demonstrate the capabilities of high-frequency ultrasound. These data could help lay the groundwork for improving insight into clinical prediction of AAA expansion. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This work characterizes a relatively new murine model of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) by quantifying vascular strain, stress, and geometry. Furthermore, Green-Lagrange strain was calculated with a novel mapping approach using four-dimensional ultrasound. We also compared growing and stable AAAs, finding peak wall stress and surface area per length to be most indicative of growth. In all AAAs, strain and elastin health declined, whereas tortuosity increased.

scholarly journals On the Relative Impact of Intraluminal Thrombus Heterogeneity on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Mechanics

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Leach ◽  
Evan Kao ◽  
Chengcheng Zhu ◽  
David Saloner ◽  
Michael D. Hope
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Aneurysm Rupture ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Intraluminal Thrombus ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Aneurysm Wall ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Intraluminal thrombus (ILT) is present in the majority of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) of a size warranting consideration for surgical or endovascular intervention. The rupture risk of AAAs is thought to be related to the balance of vessel wall strength and the mechanical stress caused by systemic blood pressure. Previous finite element analyses of AAAs have shown that ILT can reduce and homogenize aneurysm wall stress. These works have largely considered ILT to be homogeneous in mechanical character or have idealized a stiffness distribution through the thrombus thickness. In this work, we use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to delineate the heterogeneous composition of ILT in 7 AAAs and perform patient–specific finite element analysis under multiple conditions of ILT layer stiffness disparity. We find that explicit incorporation of ILT heterogeneity in the finite element analysis is unlikely to substantially alter major stress analysis predictions regarding aneurysm rupture risk in comparison to models assuming a homogenous thrombus, provided that the maximal ILT stiffness is the same between models. Our results also show that under a homogeneous ILT assumption, the choice of ILT stiffness from values common in the literature can result in significantly larger variations in stress predictions compared to the effects of thrombus heterogeneity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document