Factors Affecting Sulfur Reactions in High Sulfur Oil Shale Pyrolysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar S. Al-Ayed ◽  
Moh’d Matouq

Oil shale samples from the Ellajjun area south of Jordan were pyrolyzed in different conditions and environments. Sulfur of shale oil was determined using x-ray fluorescence (XRF). Generated products swept from the retort by several sweeping media; they include nitrogen, water vapor, hydrogen, and mixture of nitrogen and water vapor. Other conditions are 2–11 mm particle size, 1 atm operating pressure, and 410–550°C temperature range. The sulfur content of shale oil was found to be 12 wt % for hydrogen pyrolysis, while water vapor at 1 atm decreased this value to 7 wt %. Hydrogenation of oil shale resulted in 12 wt %. the sulfur content of shale oil being at 420°C, and then reduced to 10.3 wt % at temperatures higher than 470°C. When water vapor is added to nitrogen, the sulfur in the oil shale is increased by 4 wt %. Water vapor sweeping gas increased the sulfur of the shale oil from 6.5 wt % to 8.1 wt % compared with a nitrogen pyrolyzing medium. Retorted shale analysis showed 44 wt %, and 31 wt % is left in the retorted shale of the original 4.5 wt %. Sulfur found in the raw oil shale is unretorted for nitrogen and hydrogen sweeping gases. On the other hand, increasing particle size from 2 mm to 11 mm did not have any significant influence on the sulfur content of the produced shale oil.

1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (03) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Bae

Abstract A series of batch-type retorting experiments 930 degrees F were performed to investigate the effect of pressure and surrounding atmosphere on the retorting of oil shale. The experimental pressure ranged from atmospheric to 2,500 psig. pressure ranged from atmospheric to 2,500 psig. The sweeping gases used were N2, COe, H2O, NH3 and H2. We found that high pressure reduces the oil yield significantly and produces a larger volume of light hydrocarbon gases. The crude shale oil obtained at high pressure has higher aromaticity and a lower pour point than the low pressure material. The sulfur pour point than the low pressure material. The sulfur and nitrogen content in shale oil does not change significantly with increasing pressure. The effect of sweeping gas is usually small. In general, gases which decompose to yield H2 increase the oil yield at high pressure. At atmospheric pressure there is no effect. The high oil yield with H2, pressure there is no effect. The high oil yield with H2, more than 100 percent of the Fischer Assay, reported on "hydrotorting" experiments was not observed in this work. Introduction The in-situ retorting of oil shale has attracted much interest because it obviates the troublesome problem in surface retorting of mining, crushing and problem in surface retorting of mining, crushing and handling a large quantity of oil shale. The cost of these operations in the surface retorting process amounts to more than half the total production cost of shale oil. From an economic point of view, the recovery of shale oil by in-situ methods is highly desirable At present in--situ retorting is accomplished by combustion or hot gas injection, following conventional hydraulic fracturing. Explosive fracturing also has been studied. While these methods of fracturing are promising, there is still much uncertainty associated with them. On the other hand, even if an adequate mass permeability could be created, the high pressures encountered at depths of several thousand feet where oil shale commonly existwould certainly affect the thermal decomposition of oil shale. Thomas has experimentally simulated the effects of overburden pressure on the physical and mechanical properties of oil shale during underground retorting. Allred and Nielson studied the effect of pressure in reverse combustion on the yield and pressure in reverse combustion on the yield and quality of oil produced. These results are fragmentary and are applicable only to reverse combustion. Grant reported an oil yield of 35 to 40 percent of the Fischer Assay was obtained in a laboratory forward combustion experiment at 500 psig. We decided to investigate the effect of pressure on oil shale retorting because so little information was available on subjects. We sought to determine me effects of fluid pressure and surrounding atmosphere on the quantity and quality of products obtained from retorting oil slide. Results of a series of batch-type retorting experiments are reported. EXPERIMENTAL EQUIPMENT A schematic drawing of the retorting and product-collecting system is shown in Fig. 1. The pump product-collecting system is shown in Fig. 1. The pump delivers the sweeping gas at a constant rate to the retorting unit, which is maintained at the experimental pressure. The gas purged from the unit passes through pressure. The gas purged from the unit passes through a glass adapter to a centrifuge tube that is cooled by an ice-salt mixture. The gases are cooled further in the condenser that is kept at 32 degrees F and then sampled, measured through a wet-test meter, and vented. The retorting unit is an Autoclave single-ended reactor of 2–3/16-in. ID and 8–1/4-in. inside depth, rated 3,000 psi at 1000 degree F. SPEJ P. 287


2019 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Ze Wang ◽  
Jingdong He ◽  
Ermei Liu ◽  
Wenli Song ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Yun-zhang Rao ◽  
Chang-shun Tian ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Chun-yu Xiao ◽  
Bo-yun Yuan ◽  
...  

The explosion pressure and minimum explosible concentration (MEC) properties of metal sulfide ore dust clouds are valuable for the prevention and control of metal sulfide ore dust explosions. In this study, a 20 L explosion sphere vessel was used to investigate the effect of sulfur content, particle size, and concentration on the explosion pressure and minimum explosible concentration of metal sulfide ore dust clouds. Four samples with different sulfur contents were selected (30%–40%, 20%–30%, 10%–20%, and 0%–10%). Before and after the explosion, samples were tested by X-ray diffraction. The results indicate that the metal sulfide ore dust is explosive dust with St1 grade explosion pressure. With an increase in concentration, the maximum explosion pressure increased at first and then decreased. With an increase in sulfide content, the explosion pressure of metal sulfide ore dust increased, while the minimum explosible concentration decreased. As particle size decreased, the MEC also decreased. The sulfur content, particle size, and concentration of metal sulfide ore dust were the main factors affecting the explosion hazard.


2019 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 1468-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarik Saif ◽  
Qingyang Lin ◽  
Ying Gao ◽  
Yousef Al-Khulaifi ◽  
Federica Marone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (13) ◽  
pp. 6799-6807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarik Saif ◽  
Qingyang Lin ◽  
Kamaljit Singh ◽  
Branko Bijeljic ◽  
Martin J. Blunt

2013 ◽  
Vol 860-863 ◽  
pp. 960-966
Author(s):  
Yao Xiong ◽  
Ming Jie Ma ◽  
Guan Yu Wang ◽  
Shan Xiu Huang ◽  
Guang Yi Cai ◽  
...  

Lots of basic analyses carried on YJOS (Yaojie oil shale) and LKOS (Longkou oil shale) consist of proximate analysis, ultimate analysis, XRF analysis and shale oil yield in aluminum retort. Besides, TGA are used on YJOS, LKOS and shale oil, gas chromatographic analysis is used on retorting gas. The results show that LKOS and YJOS have the same hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, but LKOS has higher volatile component and its oil yield in aluminum retort is much higher than YJOS. Ca content in LKOS is much higher than YJOS, however, Al and Fe content in LKOS are lower than YJOS. Two kinds of shale oil after destructive distillation have similar composition and relative content, in addition, they all produce more low boiling point distillates, combustible component of their destructive distillation gas are H2 and CH4, the second are CO and C2H6. Aluminium retort experimental findings, The carbonization temperature is the main influence factor on oil shale destructive distillation process in aluminum retort. Residence time has small influence on shale oil yield but need to choose appropriate heating rate and particle size. Best carbonization parameters of LKOS in aluminum retort: Temperature 500~550°C, heating rate 5°C/min, particle size 2~4mm, Residence time 10~20min;the best parameters of YJOS: Temperature 500~550°C, heating rate 5°C/min, particle size0.2~0.9mm, residence time 10~20min.


Scanning ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Donghao Li ◽  
Haodan Pan ◽  
Xiaojing Di ◽  
Xiaoyang Liu ◽  
Hongxiang Hu

This paper briefly describes the research status of oil shale pyrolysis technology and the main factors affecting oil shale pyrolysis, with emphasis on four kinds of commonly used catalysts: The effects of natural minerals, metal compounds, molecular sixes, and supported catalysts on the pyrolysis of oil shale were discussed. The changes of the pyrolysis mechanism and product composition of oil shale with the addition of different catalysts were discussed. Finally, the development direction of preparation of new catalysts was discussed, in order to provide a prospect for the development and utilization of unconventional and strategic alternative energy resources around the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document