Estimation of Elastic Follow-Up Behavior on 18Cr-8Ni Steel Using Simplified Inelastic Analysis

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. I. Kobayashi ◽  
Y. Saitoh ◽  
T. Udoguchi
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Constitutive Equation ◽  
Elastic Limit ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Cyclic Test ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Inelastic Analysis

Elastic follow-up behavior was estimated using simplified inelastic methods newly developed, where only a constitutive equation of creep and a triangle of elastic follow-up were employed in the analysis. Then, uniaxial cyclic elastic follow-up tests were performed on an austenitic stainless steel SUS 304 at 700°C, and test results were compared with analyses. Since most of the starting points of elastic follow-up tests in the present experiments were beyond the elastic limit of the test material, the triangle of elastic follow-up had to be modified in the analyses. As a consequence, experimental results of elastic follow-up behavior for the first cycle agreed well with those analytically determined. Moreover, the test results obtained in subsequent cycles were found conservative compared with an extension of analyses that used the data obtained in the first cycle of cyclic test.

Effects of Surface Finish and Loading Conditions on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel in PWR Environment for Various Strain Amplitude Levels

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Alain Le Duff ◽  
Andre´ Lefranc¸ois ◽  
Jean Philippe Vernot
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Strain Amplitude ◽  
Surface Finish ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Complex Loading ◽  
Loading Conditions ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Cycle Fatigue

In February/March 2007, The NRC issued Regulatory Guide “RG1.207” and Argonne National Laboratory issued NUREG/CR-6909 that is now applicable in the US for evaluations of PWR environmental effects in fatigue analyses of new reactor components. In order to assess the conservativeness of the application of this NUREG report, Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) tests were performed by AREVA NP on austenitic stainless steel specimens in a PWR environment. The selected material exhibits in air environment a fatigue behavior consistent with the ANL reference “air” mean curve, as published in NUREG/CR-6909. LCF tests in a PWR environment were performed at various strain amplitude levels (± 0.6% or ± 0.3%) for two loading conditions corresponding to a simple or to a complex strain rate history. The simple loading condition is a fully reverse triangle signal (for comparison purposes with tests performed by other laboratories with the same loading conditions) and the complex signal simulates the strain variation for an actual typical PWR thermal transient. In addition, two various surface finish conditions were tested: polished and ground. This paper presents the comparisons of penalty factors, as observed experimentally, with penalty factors evaluated using ANL formulations (considering the strain integral method for complex loading), and on the other, the comparison of the actual fatigue life of the specimen with the fatigue life predicted through the NUREG report application. For the two strain amplitudes of ± 0.6% and ± 0.3%, LCF tests results obtained on austenitic stainless steel specimens in PWR environment with triangle waveforms at constant low strain rates give “Fen” penalty factors close to those estimated using the ANL formulation (NUREG/6909). However, for the lower strain amplitude level and a triangle loading signal, the ANL formulation is pessimistic compared to the AREVA NP test results obtained for polished specimens. Finally, it was observed that constant amplitude LCF test results obtained on ground specimens under complex loading simulating an actual sequence of a cold and hot thermal shock exhibits lower combined environmental and surface finish effects when compared to the penalty factors estimated on the basis of the ANL formulations. It appears that the application of the NUREG/CR-6909 in conjunction with the Fen model proposed by ANL for austenitic stainless steel provides excessive margins, whereas the current ASME approach seems sufficient to cover significant environmental effects for representative loadings and surface finish conditions of reactor components.

Yb:YAG Disc Laser Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steel Without Filler Material

2009 ◽  
Vol 410-411 ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markku Keskitalo ◽  
Kari Mäntyjärvi
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Base Material ◽  
Tensile Tests ◽  
Solidification Cracking ◽  
Filler Material ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Butt Weld

The laser weldability of austenitic stainless steel (ASS) is good because of the material’s high absorptivity and favourable microstructure. There can be a slight possibility of solidification cracking at high welding speeds and low Crekv/Niekv ratios. Test welds were welded with a Yb:YAG disc laser. The test material was 3.2 mm EN 1.4404 2H C700 type stainless steel plate which was work hardened by cold rolling. The test materials were welded with different heat inputs ranging from 0.024 kJ/mm to 0.12 kJ/mm and with 300 mm and 200 mm focal lengths. The weld seams were square-groove welded as butt weld without filler material. The edges of the groove were made by mechanical or laser cutting. The hardness profiles from cross-sections of the welds were measured with a Vickers microhardness tester using 200 g weight. The mechanical properties were tested with tensile tests. The welds were classified with radiographic verification by an accredited laboratory. A number of the welds were fatigue tested with a bending fatigue tester. The mechanical properties (Rp 0.2%, Rm) of the laser welds were almost the same as in the base material except at the highest heat input. In the radiographic classification, the welds which were welded to the laser-cut edge were classified as class B (accepted). The other welds were classified as class D or C (rejected). The main reasons for the rejection of welds made on mechanically cut edges were lack of penetration or undercut of the weld. A problem with mechanically cut edges, and hence the welds, is that they can be non-square and bent edge. Fatigue tests and tensile tests gave no evidence of solidification cracking in the microstructure of the solidified parts of the welds.

Effects of Surface Finish and Loading Conditions on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel in PWR Environment: Comparison of LCF Test Results With NUREG/CR-6909 Life Estimations

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Alain Le Duff ◽  
Andre´ Lefranc¸ois ◽  
Jean Philippe Vernot
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Environmental Effects ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Complex Signal ◽  
Loading Conditions ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Cycle Fatigue

During mid 2006, ANL issued a NUREG/CR-6909 [2] report that is now applicable in The US for evaluations of PWR environmental effects in the fatigue analysis of new reactor components. In order to assess the conservativeness of the application of this NUREG report, low cycle fatigue (LCF) tests were performed by AREVA NP on austenitic stainless steel specimens in a PWR environment. The selected material exhibits in an air environment a fatigue behavior consistent with the ANL reference “air” mean curve. Tests were performed for two various loading conditions: for fully reverse triangular signal (for comparison purpose with tests performed by other laboratories with same loading conditions) and complex signal, simulating strain variation for actual typical PWR thermal transients. Two surface finish conditions were tested: polished and ground. The paper presents on one side the comparison of environmental penalty factors (Fen = Nair,RT/Nwater) as observed experimentally with the ANL formulation (considering the strain integral method for complex loading), and, on the other hand, the actual fatigue life of the specimen with the fatigue life predicted through the NUREG/CR-6909 application. Low Cycle Fatigue test results obtained on austenitic stainless steel specimens in PWR environment with triangle waveforms at constant low strain rates gives Fen penalty factors close to those estimated using the ANL formulation (NUREG report 6909). On the contrary, it was observed that constant amplitude LCF test results obtained under complex signal reproducing an actual sequence of a cold and hot thermal shock exhibits significantly lower environmental effects when compared to the Fen penalty factor estimated on the basis of the ANL formulations. It appears that the application of the NUREG/CR-6909 [2] in conjunction with the Fen model proposed by ANL for austenitic stainless steel provides excessive margins whereas the current ASME approach seems sufficient to cover significant environmental effect for components.

Block Shear Behaviors of Angle Two-Bolted Connections with Austenitic Stainless Steel – Experiment and Finite Element Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 658 ◽  
pp. 350-353
Author(s):  
Tae Soo Kim ◽  
Min Seung Kim ◽  
Sung Woo Shin
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Ultimate Strength ◽  
Strength Reduction ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Bolted Connections ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Block Shear

Since stainless steel has significant characteristics such as its superior corrosion resistance, durability, aesthetic appeal etc., it has been utilized as structural members in buildings. Recently, ultimate behaviors and curling influence in austenitic stainless steel single shear bolted connections with thin-walled plane plates have been investigated by T.S. Kim. In this paper, finite element analysis (FEA) has been conducted based on the existing test results of angle bolted connections in fabricated with austenitic stainless steel. The validation of the numerical analysis prediction was verified through the comparison of test results for fracture mode, ultimate strength and curling occurrence. Curling (out-of- plane deformation) also observed in the connections with a long end distance. The curling caused the ultimate strength reduction and the ultimate strength reduction ratios (varied from 12% to 25%) caused by curling have been estimated quantitatively through the comparison of FEA results of FE models with free edge and restrained curling.

scholarly journals Aging precipitation behavior of σ phase in 22Cr15Ni3.5Cu austenitic stainless steel

2021 ◽  
Vol 2085 (1) ◽  
pp. 012026
Author(s):  
Pengcheng Che ◽  
Fengjun Wang ◽  
Xindong Li ◽  
Min Xie ◽  
Yuze Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Grain Boundary ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Tem Analysis ◽  
Precipitation Mechanism ◽  
Σ Phase ◽  
Aging Precipitation ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Precipitation Phase

Abstract σ phase is one of the main precipitates affecting the toughness of austenitic stainless steel, V-notch impact test, SEM, EDS and TEM analysis were conducted on the newly developed 22Cr15Ni3.5Cu stainless steel after 650°C aging. Precipitation mechanism of σ phase and its effect on the toughness of the material were analyzed. The test results show that toughness of the material decreases to 25.6J after 300h aging, σ phase started to precipitate along the grain boundary after 500h aging, and in the crystal after 1000h aging. The precipitation spacing is about 100 nm, forming a gradually increasing size from crystal to grain boundary. As the precipitation time 500h of σ phase was later than the critical aging time of ductile brittle transition, it can be inferred from the test result that σ phase is not the main precipitation phase affecting the toughness of 22Cr15Ni3.5Cu.

Nickel Release Rate of Type 303 Free Cutting Austenitic Stainless Steel

2015 ◽  
Vol 1096 ◽  
pp. 114-119
Author(s):  
Jun Ping Yuan ◽  
De Dong Chen ◽  
Hai Rui Bo
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Release Rate ◽  
Manganese Sulfide ◽  
Contrast Material ◽  
304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Nickel Release ◽  
Prolonged Contact ◽  
Nickel Release Rate

Type 303 austenitic stainless steel has been applied in jewelry production, and its nickel release rate has become a concerned issue in the jewelry industry. In this paper, the commercial type 303 stainless steel was used as the test material, while 304 stainless steel as the contrast material; their nickel release rates and corrosion behaviors in artificial sweat were studied. The results show that the actually measured nickel release rate of 303 stainless steel reaches 2.06μg/cm2/week, nearly 25 times higher than that of 304 stainless steel, which exceeds the threshold specified in nickel release standard EN1811:2011 for jewelries coming into direct and prolonged contact with the skin (0.88μg/cm2/week), and its adjusted value also exceeds the threshold specified in Nickel Directive 2004/96/EC for puncture accessories (0.35μg/cm2/week). The high nickel release rate for 303 stainless steel is mainly caused by its high sulfur content and the inevitable formation of manganese sulfide inclusions, which will cause the pitting and exacerbate the material corrosion. Considering the risk of nickel sensitization of 303 stainless steel, it is not suggested to use 303 stainless steel as the jewelry material, especially for piercing jewelry.

Mechanical Behavior of Overlap-Welded of Dissimilar Steels (Structural-Stainless) under Monotonic Load

2012 ◽  
Vol 557-559 ◽  
pp. 1268-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés L. García Fuentes ◽  
Pierre Bazán ◽  
Leiry Centeno ◽  
Magaly Ramos ◽  
Alberto Velázquez Del Rosario
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Welding Process ◽  
Mechanical Tests ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Hardness Profile ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Electrical Arc ◽  
Arc Welding Process

The research shows the characterization of mechanical properties in dissimilar steel welded unions: a structural steel ASTM A537 (I) overlap welded with an austenitic stainless steel ASTM A240 (304L) through semiautomatic electrical arc welding process protected by inert gas (GMAW); Argon is used as a protecting gas and austenitic stainless steel ASTM A240 (308L) as a supplier material. Samples were tested in not welded conditions so as to characterize the materials involved in the research, and they were also tested in welded conditions, not being submitted to pre and post welding Thermal Treatment (TT). Welded-based material samples were characterized through Optical Microscopy (OM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), an inspection of Not Destructive Test (NDT) with penetrating liquids and ultrasound was also conducted. The following mechanical tests were completed, not only on the Base Metals (BM), on the Welding Join (WJ) as well: Vickers micro hardness profile, tension, and face bending test. Results showed a proper mechanical steel behavior, welded by GMAW procedure, under monotonic, in spite of the relatively high values of microhardness in the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ), specifically near the fusion line between weld and stainless steel.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document