Simple Bounds on Limit Loads by Elastic Finite Element Analysis

1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Mackenzie ◽  
C. Nadarajah ◽  
J. Shi ◽  
J. T. Boyle

A method for bounding limit loads by an iterative elastic continuum finite element analysis procedure, referred to as the elastic compensation method, is proposed. A number of sample problems are considered, based on both exact solutions and finite element analysis, and it is concluded that the method may be used to obtain limit-load bounds for pressure vessel design by analysis applications with useful accuracy.

1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.P. Mangalaramanan ◽  
R. Seshadri

Robust methods for estimating limit loads of symmetric and non-symmetric plate structures are presented. The methods proposed in this paper for determining limit loads are (1) the r-node method and (2) the semi-circle construction technique. Analytical methods for estimating the limit loads of plate structures are feasible only for simple configurations. Also, determination of limit loads based on assumed collapse mechanisms may not always give upper bound estimates. Limit analysis using inelastic finite element analysis is often elaborate and time consuming. The methods described in this paper circumvent these difficulties. The methods are applied to several configurations of symmetric and non-symmetric plate structures and the limit load estimates are found to be satisfactory.


Author(s):  
R. Adibi-Asl ◽  
R. Seshadri

Limit loads for different crack configurations are determined in this paper by invoking the concept of equivalence of “static indeterminacy” that relates a multidimensional component configuration to a “reference two-bar structure.” Simple scaling relationships are developed that enable rapid determination of limit loads. The method is applied to different crack configurations, and the limit loads are compared with corresponding results obtained from inelastic finite element analysis.


Author(s):  
Peter A. Frost

The R6 Revision 4 Procedure ‘Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects’, states that the use of the finite element ‘global’ limit load derived for pipe branch components can be non-conservative when used with the Option 1 and 2 failure assessment curves but that ‘local’ limit loads, based on the spread of plasticity through the pipe wall, should lead to conservative results. The current advice of R6 is based on separate studies by Fox and Connors of pipe branch components with fully extended surface defects. Their studies provide two distinct methods for calculating a suitably conservative local limit load. However, there is concern that these two methods may provide an overly conservative local limit load with therefore a less realistic prediction of defect tolerance. Furthermore, typical defectiveness is perhaps most commonly characterised as a semi-elliptic surface defect and it is therefore necessary to adapt both these methods in order to accommodate such defects. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate local limit load approaches for pipe branch components with postulated semi-elliptic surface defects. A typical pipe branch component was chosen for assessment during this study, as part of a series of separate studies on a variety of pipe branch components. Local limit loads were calculated using two approaches. The first approach adapted the ‘Connors’ method by applying an adjustment to allow for the semi-elliptic surface defect; this is referred to as the ‘Modified Connors’ approach. The second approach used cracked body finite element analysis and evaluated the local limit load by consideration of the onset of plasticity at the crack ligament. The global limit load was also derived from the cracked body finite element analysis. Assessment points were developed using global and local limit loads, both obtained by cracked body finite element analysis, and also by using the ‘Modified Connors’ local limit load approach. R6 Option 3 failure assessment curves were produced for each limit load approach in order to investigate the extent of any non-conservatism in the Option 1 and 2 failure assessment curves with the chosen limit load approach.


Author(s):  
Rahul Jain

This paper explores the use of limit load analysis methods for the design of a pressure vessel manway cover as per the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code guidelines. The results of elastic and limit load finite element analysis are discussed for the design. The concept of reference volume consideration along with linear elastic finite element analysis to determine the lower bound limit load has been explored and the results are compared with the non-linear elastic-plastic limit load analysis.


Author(s):  
R. Adibi-Asl ◽  
R. Seshadri

Cracks and flaws occur in mechanical components and structures, and can lead to catastrophic failures. Therefore, integrity assessment of components with defects is carried out. This paper describes the Elastic Modulus Adjustment Procedures (EMAP) employed herein to determine the limit load of components with cracks or crack-like flaw. On the basis of linear elastic Finite Element Analysis (FEA), by specifying spatial variations in the elastic modulus, numerous set of statically admissible and kinematically admissible distributions can be generated, to obtain lower and upper bounds limit loads. Due to the expected local plastic collapse, the reference volume concept is applied to identify the kinematically active and dead zones in the component. The Reference Volume Method is shown to yield a more accurate prediction of local limit loads. The limit load values are then compared with results obtained from inelastic finite element analysis. The procedures are applied to some practical components with cracks in order to verify their effectiveness in analyzing crack geometries. The analysis is then directed to geometries containing multiple cracks and three-dimensional defect in pressurized components.


2008 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Adibi-Asl ◽  
R. Seshadri

Limit loads are determined in this paper by invoking the concept of equivalence of “static indeterminacy” that relates a multidimensional component configuration (with cracks) to a “reference two-bar structure.” Simple scaling relationships are developed that enable rapid determination of limit loads. The method is applied to different crack configurations, and the limit loads are compared with corresponding results obtained from inelastic finite element analysis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 201-203 ◽  
pp. 830-835
Author(s):  
Chang Gao Xia ◽  
Jian Kuan Su ◽  
Mao Hui Pan

This paper presents an integrated method, which is based on the CAD/CAE, for engine crankshaft design. A parametric modeling system of engine crankshaft is established with the CATIA secondary development tools. Taking advantage of the finite element analysis procedure of engine crankshaft strength which is programmed with ANSYS APDL programming language, the parametric loading, automatic solution and result analysis of the crankshaft strength can be realized. Integrating the parametric modeling system of engine crankshaft and the special finite element analysis procedure of the engine crankshaft strength, the three-dimensional digital model of the crankshaft can be generated rapidly. By changing the structure dimension, the crankshaft series design is achieved and the design and analysis can be improved. Therefore, it is helpful to improve the design quality and efficiency of crankshaft and shorten the design cycle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (25) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deepali Mathur ◽  
Mandar Sapre ◽  
Chintan Hingoo ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
James K. Wilkins

A project has been conducted to verify a finite element analysis procedure for studying the nonlinear behavior of 90°, stainless steel, 4 inch schedule 10, butt welding elbows. Two displacement controlled monotonic in-plane tests were conducted, one closing and one opening, and the loads, displacements, and strains at several locations were recorded. Stacked 90° tee rosette gages were used in both tests because of their ability to measure strain over a small area. ANSYS shell element 181 was used in the FEA reconciliations. The FEA models incorporated detailed geometric measurements of the specimens, including the welds, and material stress-strain data obtained from the attached straight piping. Initially, a mesh consisting of sixteen elements arrayed in 8 rings was used to analyze the elbow. The load-displacement correlation was quite good using this mesh, but the strain reconciliation was not. Analysis of the FEA results indicated that the axial and hoop strain gradients across the mid-section of the elbow were very high. In order to generate better strain correlations, the elbow mesh was refined in the mid-section of the elbow to include 48 elements per ring and an additional six rings, effectively increasing the element density by nine times. Using the refined mesh produced much better correlations with the strain data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document