Closure to “Discussion of ‘Elastoplastic Contact Conductance Model for Isotropic Conforming Rough Surfaces and Comparison With Experiments’” (1997, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 119, p. 392)

1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 392-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Sridhar ◽  
M. M. Yovanovich
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Contact Conductance ◽  
Elastoplastic Contact ◽  
Comparison With Experiments

Elastoplastic Contact Conductance Model for Isotropic Conforming Rough Surfaces and Comparison With Experiments

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Sridhar ◽  
M. M. Yovanovich
Keyword(s):  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Thermal Contact ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Thermal Contact Conductance ◽  
Elastic Model ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Contact Conductance ◽  
Plastic Model ◽  
Elastoplastic Contact ◽  
Wide Range

A New thermal elastoplastic contact conductance model for isotropic conforming rough surfaces is proposed. This model is based on surface and thermal models used in the Cooper, Mikic, and Yovanovich plastic model, but it differs in the deformation aspects of the thermal contact conductance model. The model incorporates the recently developed simple elastoplastic model for sphere-flat contacts, and it covers the entire range of material behavior, i.e., elastic, elastoplastic, and fully plastic deformation. Previously data were either compared with the elastic model or the plastic model assuming a type of deformation a priori. The model is used to reduce previously obtained isotropic contact conductance data, which cover a wide range of surface characteristics and material properties. For the first time data can be compared with both the elastic and plastic models on the same plot. This model explains the observed discrepancies noted by previous workers between data and the predictions of the elastic or plastic models.

Modeling of Thermal Contact Conductance

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail V. Murashov ◽  
Sergey D. Panin
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Thermal Contact ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Thermal Contact Conductance ◽  
Nonstationary Temperature ◽  
Random Component ◽  
Contact Conductance ◽  
Elastic Plastic

Nowadays a new science direction has arisen from decades of experimental work carried out in 20th century — micromechanics of contact processes (deformation, heat transfer, electric conduction). To determine contact area a dynamic elastic-plastic deformation problem is to be solved even in the simplest case — butt contact of two rough surfaces under pressure. It is followed by the solution of spatial boundary heat transfer problem to obtain nonstationary temperature distribution for two bodies. In principal, this stage is not difficult to perform with finite element program ANSYS. Meanwhile the questions concerning deformation and conduction through oxide films of metals as well as directional effect remain. In the literature there are attempts to simulate thermal contact conductance numerically of such authors as M.K.Thompson, S.Lee et al, M. Ciavarella, M.M.Yovanovich and others. The disadvantages of existing spatial models are: - surfaces profiles has no random component; - only elastic or only plastic material behavior; - microroughness is not considered. In the present work the roughness before contact of two rough surfaces of copper bodies was presented as spatial two-level (roughness and microroughness) model with the use of fractal Weierstrass–Mandelbrot function. In quasistatic approach the 3D deformation and heat transfer problems of contacting bodies under pressure were solved within elastic-plastic material behavior. Contact ANSYS elements were used. Copper compression diagram was replaced by multilinear model of isotropic hardening. From the cycle of calculations real contact areas, shapes of contact spots, temperature and stress distributions were determined for the range of pressures. Good agreement with experimental data took place only when microroughness is considered.

Reduced Rough-Surface Parametrization for Use With the Discrete-Element Model

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen T. McClain ◽  
Jason M. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Surface Characterization ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Roughness Element ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Diameter Distribution ◽  
Discrete Element Model

The discrete-element model for flows over rough surfaces was recently modified to predict drag and heat transfer for flow over randomly rough surfaces. However, the current form of the discrete-element model requires a blockage fraction and a roughness-element diameter distribution as a function of height to predict the drag and heat transfer of flow over a randomly rough surface. The requirement for a roughness-element diameter distribution at each height from the reference elevation has hindered the usefulness of the discrete-element model and inhibited its incorporation into a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver. To incorporate the discrete-element model into a CFD solver and to enable the discrete-element model to become a more useful engineering tool, the randomly rough surface characterization must be simplified. Methods for determining characteristic diameters for drag and heat transfer using complete three-dimensional surface measurements are presented. Drag and heat transfer predictions made using the model simplifications are compared to predictions made using the complete surface characterization and to experimental measurements for two randomly rough surfaces. Methods to use statistical surface information, as opposed to the complete three-dimensional surface measurements, to evaluate the characteristic dimensions of the roughness are also explored.

Reduced Rough-Surface Parameterization for Use With the Discrete-Element Model

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen T. McClain ◽  
Jason M. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Surface Characterization ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Roughness Element ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Diameter Distribution ◽  
Discrete Element Model

The discrete-element model for flows over rough surfaces was recently modified to predict drag and heat transfer for flow over randomly-rough surfaces. However, the current form of the discrete-element model requires a blockage fraction and a roughness-element diameter distribution as a function of height to predict the drag and heat transfer of flow over a randomly-rough surface. The requirement for a roughness element-diameter distribution at each height from the reference elevation has hindered the usefulness of the discrete-element model and inhibited its incorporation into a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver. To incorporate the discrete-element model into a CFD solver and to enable the discrete-element model to become a more useful engineering tool, the randomly-rough surface characterization must be simplified. Methods for determining characteristic diameters for drag and heat transfer using complete three-dimensional surface measurements are presented. Drag and heat transfer predictions made using the model simplifications are compared to predictions made using the complete surface characterization and to experimental measurements for two randomly-rough surfaces. Methods to use statistical surface information, as opposed to the complete three-dimensional surface measurements, to evaluate the characteristic dimensions of the roughness are also explored.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document