Combined Power Plants—Past, Present, and Future

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 608-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Horlock
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Early History ◽  
Future Prospects ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
History Of

The early history of combined power plants is described, together with the birth of the CCGT plant (the combined “cycle” gas turbine). Sustained CCGT development in the 1970s and 1980s, based on sound thermodynamic considerations, is outlined. Finally more recent developments and future prospects for the combined gas turbine/steam turbine combined plant are discussed.

Steam Injected Gas Turbine (STIG) for Load Flexible CHP: Aspects of Dynamic Behaviour, Control and Water Recovery

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten Lutsch ◽  
Uwe Gampe ◽  
Guntram Buchheim
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Operating Cost ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
System Response ◽  
Water Recovery ◽  
Operating Range ◽  
Demand Fluctuations ◽  
Wide Operating

Abstract Industrial combined heat and power (CHP) plants are often faced with highly variable demand of heat and power. Demand fluctuations up to 50% of nominal load are not uncommonly. The cost and revenue situation in the energy market represents a challenge, also for cogeneration of heat and power (CHP). More frequent and rapid load changes and a wide operating range are required for economic operation of industrial power plants. Maintaining pressure in steam network is commonly done directly by a condensation steam turbine in a combined cycle or indirectly by load changes of the gas turbine in a gas turbine and heat recovery steam generator arrangement. Both result in a change of the electric output of the plant. However, operating cost of a steam turbine are higher than a single gas turbine. The steam injected gas turbine (STIG) cycle with water recovery is a beneficial alternative. It provides an equivalent degree of freedom of power and heat generation. High process efficiency is achieved over a wide operating range. Although STIG is a proven technology, it is not yet widespread. The emphasis of this paper is placed on modeling the system behavior, process control and experiences in water recovery. A dynamic simulation model, based on OpenModelica, has been developed. It provides relevant information on system response for fluctuating steam injection and helps to optimize instrumentation and control. Considerable experience has been gained on water recovery with respect to condensate quality, optimum water treatment architecture and water recovery rate, which is also presented.

Effects of Steam Reheat in Advanced Steam Injected Gas Turbine Cycles

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hofstädter ◽  
H. U. Frutschi ◽  
H. Haselbacher
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Steam Injection ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Back Pressure ◽  
Turbine Efficiency ◽  
Pressure Steam ◽  
Additional Improvement ◽  
Gas Turbine Exhaust

Steam injection is a well-known principle for increasing gas turbine efficiency by taking advantage of the relatively high gas turbine exhaust temperatures. Unfortunately, performance is not sufficiently improved compared with alternative bottoming cycles. However, previously investigated supplements to the STIG-principle — such as sequential combustion and consideration of a back pressure steam turbine — led to a remarkable increase in efficiency. The cycle presented in this paper includes a further improvement: The steam, which exits from the back pressure steam turbine at a rather low temperature, is no longer led directly into the combustion chamber. Instead, it reenters the boiler to be further superheated. This modification yields additional improvement of the thermal efficiency due to a significant reduction of fuel consumption. Taking into account the simpler design compared with combined-cycle power plants, the described type of an advanced STIG-cycle (A-STIG) could represent an interesting alternative regarding peak and medium load power plants.

scholarly journals Simulation of Producer Gas Fired Power Plants with Inlet Fog Cooling and Steam Injection

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mun Roy Yap ◽  
Ting Wang
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Output ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Steam Injection ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Producer Gas ◽  
Turbine Inlet ◽  
Cycle Systems

Biomass can be converted to energy via direct combustion or thermochemical conversion to liquid or gas fuels. This study focuses on burning producer gases derived from gasifying biomass wastes to produce power. Since the producer gases are usually of low calorific values (LCV), power plant performance under various operating conditions has not yet been proven. In this study, system performance calculations are conducted for 5MWe power plants. The power plants considered include simple gas turbine systems, steam turbine systems, combined cycle systems, and steam injection gas turbine systems using the producer gas with low calorific values at approximately 30% and 15% of the natural gas heating value (on a mass basis). The LCV fuels are shown to impose high compressor back pressure and produce increased power output due to increased fuel flow. Turbine nozzle throat area is adjusted to accommodate additional fuel flows to allow the compressor to operate within safety margin. The best performance occurs when the designed pressure ratio is maintained by widening nozzle openings, even though the turbine inlet pressure is reduced under this adjustment. Power augmentations under four different ambient conditions are calculated by employing gas turbine inlet fog cooling. Comparison between inlet fog cooling and steam injection using the same amount of water mass flow indicates that steam injection is less effective than inlet fog cooling in augmenting power output. Maximizing steam injection, at the expense of supplying the steam to the steam turbine, significantly reduces both the efficiency and the output power of the combined cycle. This study indicates that the performance of gas turbine and combined cycle systems fueled by the LCV fuels could be very different from the familiar behavior of natural gas fired systems. Care must be taken if on-shelf gas turbines are modified to burn LCV fuels.

An Integrated Steam/Gas Turbine-Generator for Combined-Cycle Applications

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Gas Temperature ◽  
Turbine Generator ◽  
Fully Integrated ◽  
Reheat Steam ◽  
Exhaust Gas Temperature ◽  
Steam Cycle

Combined-cycle power plants have been built with the gas turbine, steam turbine, and generator connected end-to-end to form a machine having a single shaft. To date, these plants have utilized a nonreheat steam cycle and a single-casing steam turbine of conventional design, connected to the collector end of the generator through a flexible shaft coupling. A new design has been developed for application of an advanced gas turbine of higher rating and higher firing temperature and exhaust gas temperature with a reheat steam cycle. The gas turbine and steam turbine are fully integrated mechanically, with solid shaft couplings and a common thrust bearing. This paper describes the new machine, with emphasis on the steam turbine section where the elimination of the flexible coupling created a number of unusual design requirements. Significant benefits in reduced cost and reduced complexity of design, operation, and maintenance are achieved as a result of the integration of the machine and its control and auxiliary systems.

Repowering: An Option for Refurbishment of Old Thermal Power Plants in Latin-American Countries

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Washington Orlando Irrazabal Bohorquez ◽  
Joa˜o Roberto Barbosa ◽  
Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira ◽  
Electo E. Silva Lora
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Rankine Cycle ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Fuel Oil ◽  
Thermal Power Plants

The operational rules for the electricity markets in Latin America are changing at the same time that the electricity power plants are being subjected to stronger environmental restrictions, fierce competition and free market rules. This is forcing the conventional power plants owners to evaluate the operation of their power plants. Those thermal power plants were built between the 1960’s and the 1990’s. They are old and inefficient, therefore generating expensive electricity and polluting the environment. This study presents the repowering of thermal power plants based on the analysis of three basic concepts: the thermal configuration of the different technological solutions, the costs of the generated electricity and the environmental impact produced by the decrease of the pollutants generated during the electricity production. The case study for the present paper is an Ecuadorian 73 MWe power output steam power plant erected at the end of the 1970’s and has been operating continuously for over 30 years. Six repowering options are studied, focusing the increase of the installed capacity and thermal efficiency on the baseline case. Numerical simulations the seven thermal power plants are evaluated as follows: A. Modified Rankine cycle (73 MWe) with superheating and regeneration, one conventional boiler burning fuel oil and one old steam turbine. B. Fully-fired combined cycle (240 MWe) with two gas turbines burning natural gas, one recuperative boiler and one old steam turbine. C. Fully-fired combined cycle (235 MWe) with one gas turbine burning natural gas, one recuperative boiler and one old steam turbine. D. Fully-fired combined cycle (242 MWe) with one gas turbine burning natural gas, one recuperative boiler and one old steam turbine. The gas turbine has water injection in the combustion chamber. E. Fully-fired combined cycle (242 MWe) with one gas turbine burning natural gas, one recuperative boiler with supplementary burners and one old steam turbine. The gas turbine has steam injection in the combustion chamber. F. Hybrid combined cycle (235 MWe) with one gas turbine burning natural gas, one recuperative boiler with supplementary burners, one old steam boiler burning natural gas and one old steam turbine. G. Hybrid combined cycle (235 MWe) with one gas turbine burning diesel fuel, one recuperative boiler with supplementary burners, one old steam boiler burning fuel oil and one old steam turbine. All the repowering models show higher efficiency when compared with the Rankine cycle [2, 5]. The thermal cycle efficiency is improved from 28% to 50%. The generated electricity costs are reduced to about 50% when the old power plant is converted to a combined cycle one. When a Rankine cycle power plant burning fuel oil is modified to combined cycle burning natural gas, the CO2 specific emissions by kWh are reduced by about 40%. It is concluded that upgrading older thermal power plants is often a cost-effective method for increasing the power output, improving efficiency and reducing emissions [2, 7].

Investigation of Different Operation Strategies to Provide Balance Energy With an Industrial Combined Heat and Power Plant Using Dynamic Simulation

2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Kahlert ◽  
Hartmut Spliethoff
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Dynamic Simulation ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Control Valve ◽  
Combined Heat And Power ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Water Steam ◽  
Load Change

Intermittency of renewable electricity generation poses a challenge to thermal power plants. While power plants in the public sector see a decrease in operating hours, the utilization of industrial power plants is mostly unaffected because process steam has to be provided. This study investigates to what extent the load of a combined heat and power (CHP) plant can be reduced while maintaining a reliable process steam supply. A dynamic process model of an industrial combined CHP plant is developed and validated with operational data. The model contains a gas turbine (GT), a single pressure heat recovery system generator (HRSG) with supplementary firing and an extraction condensing steam turbine. Technical limitations of the gas turbine, the supplementary firing, and the steam turbine constrain the load range of the plant. In consideration of these constraints, different operation strategies are performed at variable loads using dynamic simulation. A simulation study shows feasible load changes in 5 min for provision of secondary control reserve (SCR). The load change capability of the combined cycle plant under consideration is mainly restricted by the water–steam cycle. It is shown that both the low pressure control valve (LPCV) of the extraction steam turbine and the high pressure bypass control valve are suitable to ensure the process steam supply during the load change. The controllability of the steam turbine load and the process stability are sufficient as long as the supplementary is not reaching the limits of the operating range.

scholarly journals Design and Operating Experiences With Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Units

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Jones ◽  
A. C. Shoults
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Economic Factors ◽  
Chemical Company ◽  
Gas Turbine Exhaust ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Turbine Exhaust

This paper presents details of three large gas turbine installations in the Freeport, Texas, power plants of the Dow Chemical Company. The general plant layout, integration of useful outputs, economic factors leading to the selection of these units, and experiences during startup and operation will be reviewed. All three units operate with supercharging fan, evaporative cooler, and static excitation. Two of the installations are nearly identical 32,000-kw gas turbines operating in a combined cycle with a supplementary fired 1,500,000-lb/hr boiler and a 50,000-kw noncondensing steam turbine. The other installation is a 43,000-kw gas turbine and a 20,000-kw starter-helper steam turbine on the same shaft. The gas turbine exhaust is used to supply heated feedwater for four existing boilers.

Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Triple-Level Pressure Combined Cycle With Supplementary Firing

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Vicente Torres González ◽  
Raúl Lugo Leyte ◽  
Helen Denise Lugo Méndez ◽  
Martín Salazar Pereyra ◽  
Juan José Ambriz García
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Energy Resources ◽  
Level Pressure ◽  
Combined Cycle Plant ◽  
Exergoeconomic Analysis ◽  
Gas Turbine Cycle

One of the ways to make an efficient use of energy resources is to generate power from combined cycle power plants. Besides, the implementation of supplementary firing in a combined cycle plant helps to increase its generated power. In addition, the exergoeconomic analysis is pursued by 1) carrying out a systematic approach, based on the Fuel-Product methodology, in each component of the system; and 2) generating a set of equations, which allows compute the exergetic and exergoeconomic costs of each flow. For this analysis, the environmental conditions correspond 25 °C, 1.013 bar and 45 % relative humidity. Therefore, in this work an exergoeconomic analysis of a triple-level pressure combined cycle with a 2 × 2 × 1 arrangement with and without supplementary firing is performed, so the combined cycle with supplementary firing generates 484.62 MW and has a power relation between the gas turbine cycle and steam turbine cycle of 1.35:1. Meanwhile, the combined cycle without supplementary firing generates 427.25 MW with a power ratio of the gas turbine cycle and steam turbine cycle of 1.87:1.

scholarly journals USE OF GAS TURBINES FOR COMBINED ENERGY PRODUCTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-18
Author(s):  
V. A. Bulanin
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
New Energy ◽  
State Of Research ◽  
Cis Countries

Abstract. Aim. Despite the obvious expediency of their widespread implementation, gas turbine (GT) and combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants were only used in limited quantities in the former USSR and CIS countries. Due to the exhaustion of possibilities to increase the fuel use efficiency and return on investment (ROI) in steam-turbine combined heat and power (CHP) plants, the development of GT and CCGT plants becomes an urgent problem. In current global practice, the primary fuel for gas turbines and combined cycle gas turbines is natural gas. However, until recently, there has been a lack of experience in the design, construction and operation of GT and CCGT plants in the CIS countries. Method. Due to the ad hoc nature of research in this area, it was necessary to systematise the results of existing studies and assess the state of research at the world level taking regional characteristics into account. Results. The article presents the main considerations and potential effectiveness of the use of gas turbines. Basic gas turbine construction schemes are investigated along with their techno-economic characteristics and an assessment of their comparative utility. Conclusion. Considering the widespread availability of natural gas, it is recommended that gas turbine and combined-cycle plants be installed as part of the process of technical re-equipment in the fuel and energy complex, industry, agriculture and municipal energy sectors as part of the design and construction of new energy sources in the light of positive world experience and the current level of development of gas turbine technologies. Ubiquitous implementation of gas turbine units in the centres supplying heat and electric loads will reduce the regional economy’s need for energy fuel and ensure an increase in energy capacity without the need to construct new complex and uneconomic steam turbine power plants. 

Investigation of Different Operation Strategies to Provide Balance Energy With an Industrial CHP Plant Using Dynamic Simulation

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Kahlert ◽  
Hartmut Spliethoff
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Dynamic Simulation ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Control Valve ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Water Steam ◽  
Load Change

Intermittency of renewable electricity generation poses a challenge to thermal power plants. While power plants in the public sector see a decrease in operating hours, the utilization of industrial power plants is mostly unaffected because process steam has to be provided. This study investigates to what extent the load of a CHP plant can be reduced while maintaining a reliable process steam supply. A dynamic process model of an industrial combined CHP plant is developed and validated with operational data. The model contains a gas turbine, a single pressure HRSG with supplementary firing and an extraction condensing steam turbine. Technical limitations of the gas turbine, the supplementary firing and the steam turbine constrain the load range of the plant. In consideration of these constraints, different operation strategies are performed at variable loads using dynamic simulation. A simulation study shows feasible load changes in 5 min for provision of secondary control reserve. The load change capability of the combined cycle plant under consideration is mainly restricted by the water-steam cycle. It is shown that both the low pressure control valve of the extraction steam turbine and the high pressure bypass control valve are suitable to ensure the process steam supply during the load change. The controllability of the steam turbine load and the process stability are sufficient as long as the supplementary is not reaching the limits of the operating range.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document