Some Faults in the Stress Analysis of Power-Hardening Materials With Pseudo-Stress Function Method

1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 554-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Yafei ◽  
Shen Yapeng ◽  
Chen Yiheng
Keyword(s):  
Stress Analysis ◽  
Stress Function ◽  
Function Method ◽  
Stress Function Method

The Fault in the Stress Analysis of Pseudo-Stress Function Method

2004 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. X. Xu ◽  
M. Z. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Stress Analysis ◽  
Imaginary Part ◽  
Stress Function ◽  
Function Method ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Airy’S Stress Function ◽  
Stress Function Method ◽  
Crucial Assumption

Although Peng Yafei and his co-workers discovered some faults with the pseudo-stress function method suggested by Y. S. Lee in 1987, the authors did not provide convincing arguments. We investigate the crucial assumption in Lee’s method by rewriting it as the form of real part and imaginary part. Through a specific counterexample, we point out that the crucial assumption in Lee’s theory is untenable. Namely, for given Airy’s stress function, it cannot be guaranteed that the pseudo-stress function Λ(x,y) exists. The root cause of the fault with Lee’s method is found in this paper.

scholarly journals SOME CONSIDERATIONS OF STRESS FUNCTION METHOD

2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (556) ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
Teisuke SUEOKA ◽  
Aoi KOGA ◽  
Nobuyoshi TOSAKA
Keyword(s):  
Stress Function ◽  
Function Method ◽  
Stress Function Method
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document