Saddlepoint Approximation for Sequential Optimization and Reliability Analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Du

A good balance between accuracy and efficiency is essential for reliability-based design (RBD). For this reason, sequential-loops formulations combined with the first-order reliability method (FORM) are usually used. FORM requires a nonlinear non-normal-to-normal transformation, which may increase the nonlinearity of a probabilistic constraint function significantly. The increased nonlinearity may lead to an increased error in reliability estimation. In order to improve accuracy and maintain high efficiency, the proposed method uses the accurate saddlepoint approximation for reliability analysis. The overall RBD is conducted in a sequence of cycles of deterministic optimization and reliability analysis. The reliability analysis is performed in the original random space without any nonlinear transformation. As a result, the proposed method provides an alternative approach to RBD with higher accuracy when the non-normal-to-normal transformation increases the nonlinearity of probabilistic constraint functions.

Author(s):  
Xiaoping Du

Reliability-based design optimization is much more computationally expensive than deterministic design optimization. To alleviate the computational demand, the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) is usually used in reliability-based design. Since FORM requires a nonlinear transformation from non-normal random variables to normal random variables, the nonlinearity of a constraint function may increase. As a result, the transformation may lead to a large error in reliability calculation. In order to improve accuracy, a new reliability-based design method with Saddlepoint Approximation is proposed in this work. The strategy of sequential optimization and reliability assessment is employed where the reliability analysis is decoupled from deterministic optimization. The accurate First Order Saddlepoint method is used for reliability analysis in the original random space without any transformation, and the chance of increasing nonlinearity of a constraint function is therefore eliminated. The overall reliability-based design is conducted in a sequence of cycles of deterministic optimization and reliability analysis. In each cycle, the percentile value of the constraint function corresponding to the required reliability is calculated with the Saddlepoint Approximation at the optimal point of the deterministic optimization. Then the reliability analysis results are used to formulate a new deterministic optimization model for the next cycle. The solution process converges within a few cycles. The demonstrative examples show that the proposed method is more accurate and efficient than the reliability-based design with FORM.


Author(s):  
Hao Wu ◽  
Xiaoping Du

Abstract The second order saddlepoint approximation (SPA) has been used for component reliability analysis for higher accuracy than the traditional second order reliability method. This work extends the second order SPA to system reliability analysis. The joint distribution of all the component responses is approximated by a multivariate normal distribution. To maintain high accuracy of the approximation, the proposed method employs the second order SPA to accurately generate the marginal distributions of component responses; to simplify computations and achieve high efficiency, the proposed method estimates the covariance matrix of the multivariate normal distribution with the first order approximation to component responses. Examples demonstrate the high effectiveness of the second order SPA method for system reliability analysis.


Author(s):  
Hao Wu ◽  
Xiaoping Du

Abstract The second-order saddlepoint approximation (SOSPA) has been used for component reliability analysis for higher accuracy than the traditional second-order reliability method (SORM). This work extends the second-order saddlepoint approximation (SPA) to system reliability analysis. The joint distribution of all the component responses is approximated by a multivariate normal distribution. To maintain high accuracy of the approximation, the proposed method employs the second-order SPA to accurately generate the marginal distributions of the component responses; to simplify computations and achieve high efficiency, the proposed method estimates the covariance matrix of the multivariate normal distribution with the first-order approximation to the component responses. Examples demonstrate the high effectiveness of the second-order SPA method for system reliability analysis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 168781401879333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiliang Huang ◽  
Tongguang Yang ◽  
Fangyi Li

Conventional decoupling approaches usually employ first-order reliability method to deal with probabilistic constraints in a reliability-based design optimization problem. In first-order reliability method, constraint functions are transformed into a standard normal space. Extra non-linearity introduced by the non-normal-to-normal transformation may increase the error in reliability analysis and then result in the reliability-based design optimization analysis with insufficient accuracy. In this article, a decoupling approach is proposed to provide an alternative tool for the reliability-based design optimization problems. To improve accuracy, the reliability analysis is performed by first-order asymptotic integration method without any extra non-linearity transformation. To achieve high efficiency, an approximate technique of reliability analysis is given to avoid calculating time-consuming performance function. Two numerical examples and an application of practical laptop structural design are presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.


2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeng D. Youn ◽  
Pingfeng Wang

Although researchers desire to evaluate system reliability accurately and efficiently over the years, little progress has been made on system reliability analysis. Up to now, bound methods for system reliability prediction have been dominant. However, two primary challenges are as follows: (1) Most numerical methods cannot effectively evaluate the probabilities of the second (or higher)–order joint failure events with high efficiency and accuracy, which are needed for system reliability evaluation and (2) there is no unique system reliability approximation formula, which can be evaluated efficiently with commonly used reliability methods. Thus, this paper proposes the complementary intersection (CI) event, which enables us to develop the complementary intersection method (CIM) for system reliability analysis. The CIM expresses the system reliability in terms of the probabilities of the CI events and allows the use of commonly used reliability methods for evaluating the probabilities of the second–order (or higher) joint failure events efficiently. To facilitate system reliability analysis for large-scale systems, the CI-matrix can be built to store the probabilities of the first- and second-order CI events. In this paper, three different numerical solvers for reliability analysis will be used to construct the CI-matrix numerically: first-order reliability method, second-order reliability method, and eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Three examples will be employed to demonstrate that the CIM with the EDR method outperforms other methods for system reliability analysis in terms of efficiency and accuracy.


Author(s):  
Debiao Meng ◽  
Hong-Zhong Huang ◽  
Huanwei Xu ◽  
Xiaoling Zhang ◽  
Yan-Feng Li

In Reliability based Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization (RBMDO), saddlepoint approximation has been utilized to improve reliability evaluation accuracy while sustaining high efficiency. However, it requires that not only involved random variables should be tractable; but also a saddlepoint can be obtained easily by solving the so-called saddlepoint equation. In practical engineering, a random variable may be intractable; or it is difficult to solve a highly nonlinear saddlepoint equation with complicated Cumulant Generating Function (CGF). To deal with these challenges, an efficient RBMDO method using Third-Moment Saddlepoint Approximation (TMSA) is proposed in this study. TMSA can construct a concise CGF using the first three statistical moments of a limit state function easily, and then express the probability density function and cumulative distribution function of the limit state function approximately using this concise CGF. To further improve the efficiency of RBMDO, a sequential optimization and reliability analysis strategy is also utilized and a formula of RBMDO using TMSA within the framework of SORA is proposed. Two examples are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.


Author(s):  
Xiaoping Du

Inverse simulation is an inverse process of a direct simulation. During the process, the simulation input variables are identified for a given set of simulation output variables. Uncertainties such as random parameters may exist in engineering applications of inverse simulation. A reliability method is developed in this work to estimate the probability distributions of unknown simulation input. The First Order Reliability Method is employed and modified so that the inverse simulation is embedded within the reliability analysis algorithm. This treatment avoids the separate executions of reliability analysis and inverse simulation and consequently maintains high efficiency. In addition, the means and standard deviations of unknown input variables can also be obtained. A particle impact problem is presented to demonstrate the proposed method for inverse simulation under uncertainty.


2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 5717-5726
Author(s):  
Ping Yi

In a reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) problem, most of the computations are used for probabilistic constraints assessment, i.e., reliability analysis. Therefore, the effectiveness, especially the correctness of the reliability analysis is very important. If the probabilistic constraint is misjudged, the optimization iteration would have convergence problems or arrive at erratic solutions. The probabilistic constraint assessment can be carried out using either the conventional reliability index approach (RIA) or the performance measure approach (PMA). In this paper, the mathematical models to calculate the reliability index in RIA and to calculate the probabilistic performance measure (PPM) in PMA are discussed. In RIA, through estimating whether the mean-value point in safe domain or not, we should use a positive or negative reliability index respectively. In PMA, one should always minimize the performance measure to compute PPM whether the performance measure at the mean-value point is positive or negative, which puts right the wrong mathematical model in some literatures and makes it possible to produce effective and efficient approach for RBDO.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document