A Comparison of Single and Multiphase Jets in a Crossflow Using Large Eddy Simulations

2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Salewski ◽  
Dragan Stankovic ◽  
Laszlo Fuchs

Large eddy simulations (LES) are performed for single and multiphase jets in crossflow (JICF). The multiphase JICF are compared to the single-phase case for the same momentum and mass flow ratios but with droplets of different sizes. Multiphase JICF have stronger counterrotating vortex pairs (CVPs) than a corresponding single-phase JICF. Moreover, their trajectories are higher and their induced wakes weaker. The smaller the Stokes number of the droplets, the more the solution approaches the solution for single-phase flow. The computed results show the formation of a CVP and horseshoe vortices, which are convected downstream. LES also reveals the intermittent formation of upright wake vortices from the horseshoe vortices on the ground toward the CVP. The dispersion of polydisperse spray droplets is computed using the stochastic parcel method. Atomization and droplet breakup are modeled by a combination of the breakup model by Reitz and the Taylor analogy breakup model (see Caraeni, D., Bergström, C., and Fuchs, L., 2000, Flow, Turbul. Combust., 65(2), pp. 223–244). Evaporation and droplet collision are also modeled. The flow solver uses two-way coupling. Averages of the velocity and gaseous fuel mass fraction are computed. The single-phase JICF is validated against experimental data obtained by PIV. Additionally, the PDFs and frequency spectra are presented.

Author(s):  
Mirko Salewski ◽  
Dragan Stankovic ◽  
Laszlo Fuchs

Large eddy simulations are performed for a single- and multiphase jets in crossflow (JICF). The multiphase JICF are compared to the single-phase case for the same momentum and mass flow ratios but with droplets of different sizes. Multiphase JICF have stronger counter-rotating vortex pairs (CVPs) than a corresponding single-phase JICF. Moreover, their trajectories are higher and their induced wakes weaker. The smaller the Stokes number of the droplets, the more the solution approaches the solution for single-phase flow. The computed results show the formation of a CVP and horseshoe vortices which are convected downstream. LES reveals also the intermittent formation of upright wake vortices from the horseshoe vortices on the ground towards the CVP. The dispersion of polydisperse spray droplets is computed using the stochastic parcel method. Atomization and droplet breakup are modeled by a combination of the breakup model by Reitz and the Taylor analogy breakup model. Evaporation and droplet collision are also modeled. The flow solver uses two-way coupling. Averages of the velocity and gaseous fuel mass fraction are computed. The single-phase JICF is validated against experimental data obtained by PIV. Additionally, the PDFs and frequency spectra are presented.


Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3360
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Gadalla ◽  
Jeevananthan Kannan ◽  
Bulut Tekgül ◽  
Shervin Karimkashi ◽  
Ossi Kaario ◽  
...  

In this study, various mixing and evaporation modeling assumptions typically considered for large-eddy simulation (LES) of the well-established Engine Combustion Network (ECN) Spray A are explored. A coupling between LES and Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT) is employed to simulate liquid n-dodecane spray injection into hot inert gaseous environment, wherein Lagrangian droplets are introduced from a small cylindrical injection volume while larger length scales within the nozzle diameter are resolved. This LES/LPT approach involves various modeling assumptions concerning the unresolved near-nozzle region, droplet breakup, and LES subgrid scales (SGS) in which their impact on common spray metrics is usually left unexplored despite frequent utilization. Here, multi-parametric analysis is performed on the effects of (i) cylindrical injection volume dimensions, (ii) secondary breakup model, particularly Kelvin–Helmholtz Rayleigh–Taylor (KHRT) against a no-breakup model approach, and (iii) LES SGS models, particularly Smagorinsky and one-equation models against implicit LES. The analysis indicates the following findings: (i) global spray characteristics are sensitive to radial dimension of the cylindrical injection volume, (ii) the no-breakup model approach performs equally well, in terms of spray penetration and mixture formation, compared with KHRT, and (iii) the no-breakup model is generally insensitive to the chosen SGS model for the utilized grid resolution.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahram Khalighi ◽  
Gianluca Iaccarino ◽  
Yaser Khalighi

AIAA Journal ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 1439-1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Lewellen ◽  
W. S. Lewellen ◽  
L. R. Poole ◽  
C. A. Hostetler ◽  
R. J. DeCoursey ◽  
...  

AIAA Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 1469-1477
Author(s):  
W. Zhao ◽  
S. H. Frankel ◽  
L. Mongeau

AIAA Journal ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 1340-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lenormand ◽  
P. Sagaut ◽  
L. Ta Phuoc ◽  
P. Comte

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document