A Knowledge-Based Tuning Method for Injection Molding Machines

2000 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 682-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongzhe Yang ◽  
Kourosh Danai ◽  
David Kazmer

Complexity of manufacturing processes has hindered methodical specification of machine setpoints for improving productivity. Traditionally in injection molding, the machine setpoints are assigned either by trial and error, based on heuristic knowledge of an experienced operator, or according to an empirical model between the inputs and part quality attributes, which is obtained from statistical design of experiments (DOE). In this paper, a Knowledge-Based Tuning (KBT) Method is presented which takes advantage of the a priori knowledge of the process, in the form of a qualitative model, to reduce the demand for experimentation. The KBT Method provides an estimate of the process feasible region (process window) as the basis of finding the suitable setpoints, and updates its knowledge-base using the data that become available during tuning. As such, the KBT Method has several advantages over conventional tuning methods: (1) the qualitative model provides a generic form of representation for linear and nonlinear processes alike, therefore, there is no need for selecting the form of the empirical model through trial and error, (2) the use of a priori knowledge eliminates the need for initial trials to construct an empirical model, so an initial feasible region can be identified as the basis of search for the suitable setpoints, and (3) the search within the feasible region leads to a higher fidelity model of this region when the input/output data from consecutive process iterations are used for learning. The KBT Method’s utility is demonstrated in production of digital video disks (DVDs).

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongzhe Yang ◽  
Kourosh Danai ◽  
David Kazmer

Abstract Complexity of manufacturing processes has hindered methodical specification of machine setpoints for improving productivity. Traditionally in injection molding, the machine setpoints are assigned either by trial and error, based on heuristic knowledge of an experienced operator, or according to an empirical model between the inputs and part quality attributes obtained from statistical design of experiments (DOE). In this paper, a Knowledge-Based Tuning (KBT) Method is presented which takes advantage of the a priori knowledge of the process, in the form of a qualitative model, to reduce the demand for experimentation. The KBT Method is designed to provide an estimate of the process feasible region (process window) as the basis of finding the optimal setpoints, and to update its knowledge-base according to new input-output data that becomes available during tuning. The KBT Method’s utility is demonstrated in production of digital video disks (DVDs).


Author(s):  
Yusuke Nakajima ◽  
Syoji Kobashi ◽  
Yohei Tsumori ◽  
Nao Shibanuma ◽  
Fumiaki Imamura ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (14) ◽  
pp. 17889-17911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Ma ◽  
Xianfeng Zhao ◽  
Qingxiao Guan ◽  
Zhoujun Xu ◽  
Yi Ma

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (7) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Sai Ma ◽  
Xianfeng Zhao ◽  
Qingxiao Guan ◽  
Chengduo Zhao

Author(s):  
John Kearns

I distinguish a priori knowledge from a priori truths or statements. A priori knowledge either is evident or is derived from evident premisses by means of correct reasoning. An a priori statement is one that reflects features of the conceptual framework within which it is placed. The statement either describes semantic relations between concepts of the framework or it characterizes the application of the framework to experience and the world. An a priori statement is not necessarily part of anyone’s a priori knowledge. I also distinguish empirical knowledge from empirical statements. Both statements and theories are empirical if they are designed to characterize features of experience and the world. Knowledge is empirical if it fits experience; thus, one must check to see whether it fits. We do not obtain knowledge of logical systems by rational insight of evident truths and careful deductions from evident truths. Adequate logical systems are developed by trial and error. Logical knowledge is empirical knowledge that is not generally a priori. It is empirical knowledge of (some) a priori truths and principles of our conceptual systems. Logical systems are empirical theories of these truths and principles.


Philosophy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Giaquinto

AbstractThis paper presents considerations against the linguistic view of a priori knowledge. The paper has two parts. In the first part I argue that problems about the individuation of lexical meanings provide evidence for a moderate indeterminacy, as distinct from the radical indeterminacy of meaning claimed by Quine, and that this undermines the idea of a priori knowledge based on knowledge of synonymies. In the second part of the paper I argue against the idea that a priori knowledge not based on knowledge of synonymies can be explained in terms of implicit definitions.1


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (17) ◽  
pp. 6863-6876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bindi Chen ◽  
Peter C. Matthews ◽  
Peter J. Tavner

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 726-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Fidler ◽  
Markus Grasmair ◽  
Otmar Scherzer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document