scholarly journals Reply to ‘Letter to the editor: is maximal diaphragm tissue velocity suited for the assessment of diaphragm contractility?’

2021 ◽  
Vol 599 (8) ◽  
pp. 2343-2344
Author(s):  
Thomas Poulard ◽  
Martin Dres ◽  
Marie‐Cécile Niérat ◽  
Isabelle Rivals ◽  
Jean‐Yves Hogrel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Velocity ◽  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-200
Author(s):  
Peter B. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Lawrence I. Shotland
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
David Cieliczka
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-93
Author(s):  
Larry Engelmann
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Gregory Frazer
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Edwin L. Harless
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Bill Fitzgibbon
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-74
Author(s):  
Kazunari J. Koike
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor

Letter to the Editor Concerning Skuk et al., “Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre and Fundamental Frequency Cues to the Perception of Voice Gender and Age in Cochlear Implant Users”

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 4325-4326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Meister ◽  
Katrin Fuersen ◽  
Barbara Streicher ◽  
Ruth Lang-Roth ◽  
Martin Walger
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Fundamental Frequency ◽  
Stimulus Type ◽  
Voice Perception ◽  
Letter To The Editor ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
General Influence

Purpose The purpose of this letter is to compare results by Skuk et al. (2020) with Meister et al. (2016) and to point to a potential general influence of stimulus type. Conclusion Our conclusion is that presenting sentences may give cochlear implant recipients the opportunity to use timbre cues for voice perception. This might not be the case when presenting brief and sparse stimuli such as consonant–vowel–consonant or single words, which were applied in the majority of studies.

Letter to the Editor

1950 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Pedrey
Keyword(s):  
Letter To The Editor
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document