scholarly journals The increase in muscle force after 4 weeks of strength training is mediated by adaptations in motor unit recruitment and rate coding

2019 ◽  
Vol 597 (7) ◽  
pp. 1873-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Del Vecchio ◽  
Andrea Casolo ◽  
Francesco Negro ◽  
Matteo Scorcelletti ◽  
Ilenia Bazzucchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Motor Unit ◽  
Muscle Force ◽  
Motor Unit Recruitment ◽  
Rate Coding

Contributions of motor-unit recruitment and rate modulation of compensation for muscle yielding

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 797-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Cordo ◽  
W. Z. Rymer
Keyword(s):  
Motor Unit ◽  
Stretch Reflex ◽  
Muscle Force ◽  
Motor Units ◽  
Muscle Stiffness ◽  
Motor Unit Recruitment ◽  
Reflex Response ◽  
Rate Modulation ◽  
Stimulus Rate ◽  
Wide Range

1. Subdivided portions of the cut ventral root innervation of the soleus muscle were electrically stimulated in 14 anesthetized cats. The stimulus trains imposed on these nerves simulated the recruitment and rate-modulation patterns of single motor units recorded during stretch-reflex responses in decerebrate preparations. Each activation pattern was evaluated for its ability to prevent muscle yield. 2. Three basic stimulus patterns, recruitment, step increases in stimulus rate, and doublets were imposed during the course of ramp stretches applied over a wide range of velocities. The effect of each stimulus pattern on muscle force was compared to the force output recorded without stretch-related recruitment or rate modulation. 3. Motor-unit recruitment was found to be most effective in preventing yield during muscle stretch. Newly recruited motor units showed no evidence of yielding for some 250 ms following activation, at which time muscle stiffness declined slightly. This time-dependent resistance to yield was observed regardless of whether the onset of the neural stimulus closely preceded or followed stretch onset. 4. Step increases in stimulus rate arising shortly after stretch onset did not prevent the occurrence of yield at most stretch velocities, but did augment muscle stiffness later in the stretch. Doublets in the stimulus train were found to augment muscle stiffness only when they occurred in newly recruited motor units. 5. These results suggest that at low or moderate initial forces, the prevention of yield in lengthening, reflexively intact muscle results primarily from rapid motor-unit recruitment. To a lesser extent, the spring-like character of the stretch-reflex response also derives from step increases in firing rate of motor units active before stretch onset and doublets in units recruited during the course of stretch. Smooth rate increases appear to augment muscle force later in the course of the reflex response.

Activation of type-identified motor units during centrally evoked contractions in the cat medial gastrocnemius muscle. I. Motor-unit recruitment

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Tansey ◽  
B. R. Botterman
Keyword(s):  
Motor Unit ◽  
Muscle Force ◽  
Muscle Tension ◽  
Motor Units ◽  
Motor Unit Recruitment ◽  
Medial Gastrocnemius ◽  
Recruitment Order ◽  
Fast Twitch ◽  
Physiological Type ◽  
Tetanic Tension

1. The recruitment order of 64 pairs of motor units, comprising 21 type-identified units, was studied during centrally evoked muscle contractions of the cat medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle in an unanesthetized, high decerebrate preparation. Motor units were functionally isolated within the MG nerve by intra-axonal (or intramyelin) penetration with conventional glass microelectrodes. 2. Graded stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) was used to evoke smoothly graded contractions, which under favorable conditions was estimated to reach 40% of maximum tetanic tension of the MG muscle. With this method of activation, 100% of slow twitch (type S) units, 95% of fast twitch, fatigue-resistant (type FR) units, 86% of fast twitch, fatigue-intermediate (type FI) units, and 49% of fast twitch, fatigable (type FF) units studied were recruited. 3. Motoneuron size as estimated by axonal conduction velocity (CV) was correlated with muscle-unit size as estimated by maximum tetanic tension (Po). Although the correlation between these properties was significant among type S and FR units, no significant correlation was found for these properties among type FI and FF units. 4. Motor-unit recruitment was ordered by physiological type (S > F, 100% of pairs; S > FR > FI > FF, 93% of pairs). Although none of the motor-unit properties studied predicted recruitment order perfectly, motor-unit recruitment was found to proceed by increasing Po (89% of pairs), decreasing contraction time (79% of pairs), decreasing fatigue index (80% of pairs), and increasing CV (76% of pairs). These percentages were significantly different from random (i.e., 50%). Statistically, all four motor-unit properties were equivalent in predicting recruitment order. These results are similar to those reported by other investigators for motor-unit recruitment order evoked from other supraspinal centers, as well as from peripheral sites. 5. When, however, motor-unit recruitment within pairs of motor units containing two fast-twitch (type F) units was examined, Po was a significantly better predictor of recruitment order than CV (85% vs. 52% of pairs). One explanation for this observation is that the correlation between Po and CV is high among type S, type FR units, and possibly among the lower-tension type FF units, but not among the remaining higher-tension type FF units. 6. The reproducibility of recruitment order in multiple contractions was investigated in 16 motor-unit pairs. Recruitment order was found to be variable in only three motor-unit pairs, all of which contained units of similar physiological type and recruitment threshold. 7. Analysis of recruitment order by pair-wise testing confirms the general conclusion reached in human studies that the muscle force level at recruitment for a motor unit is highly correlated with its strength. As an additional confirmation, the whole-muscle force level at recruitment for 41 units was measured in a series of contractions in which the rate of rise of muscle tension was limited to rates < 1,000 g/s. For these contractions, a significant correlation was found between muscle tension at recruitment and motor-unit Po.

scholarly journals Maximal strength training: the impact of eccentric overload

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 2868-2876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiril Tøien ◽  
Håvard Pedersen Haglo ◽  
Runar Unhjem ◽  
Jan Hoff ◽  
Eivind Wang
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Motor Unit ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Firing Frequency ◽  
Motor Unit Recruitment ◽  
Maximal Strength ◽  
Neural Drive ◽  
Generating Capacity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Eccentric Overload

The search for the most potent strength training intervention is continuous. Maximal strength training (MST) yields large improvements in force-generating capacity (FGC), largely attributed to efferent neural drive enhancement. However, it remains elusive whether eccentric overload, before the concentric phase, may augment training-induced neuromuscular adaptations. A total of 53 23 ± 3 (SD)-yr-old untrained males were randomized to either a nontraining control group (CG) or one of two training groups performing leg press strength training with linear progression, three times per week for 8 wk. The first training group carried out MST with four sets of four repetitions at ~90% one-repetition maximum (1RM) in both action phases. The second group performed MST with an augmented eccentric load of 150% 1RM (eMST). Measurements were taken of 1RM and rate of force development (RFD), countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, and evoked potentials recordings [V-wave (V) and H-reflex (H) normalized to M-wave (M) in musculus soleus]. 1RM increased from 133 ± 16 to 157 ± 23 kg and 123 ± 18 to 149 ± 22 kg and CMJ by 2.3 ± 3.6 and 2.2 ± 3.7cm for MST and eMST, respectively (all P < 0.05). Early, late, and maximal RFD increased in both groups [634–1,501 N/s (MST); 644–2,111 N/s (eMST); P < 0.05]. These functional improvements were accompanied by increased V/M-ratio (MST: 0.34 ± 0.11 to 0.42 ± 14; eMST: .36 ± 0.14 to 0.43 ± 13; P < 0.05). Resting H/M-ratio remained unchanged. Training-induced improvements did not differ. All increases, except for CMJ, were different from the CG. MST is an enterprise for large gains in FGC and functional performance. Eccentric overload did not induce additional improvements, suggesting firing frequency and motor unit recruitment during MST may be maximal. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to apply evoked potential recordings to investigate effects on efferent neural drive following high-intensity strength training with and without eccentric overload in a functionally relevant lower extremity exercise. We document that eccentric overload does not augment improvements in efferent neural drive or muscle force-generating capacity, suggesting that high-intensity concentric loads may maximally tax firing frequency and motor unit recruitment.

Motor Unit Recruitment and the Gradation of Muscle Force

1993 ◽  
Vol 73 (12) ◽  
pp. 830-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Peter Clamann
Keyword(s):  
Motor Unit ◽  
Muscle Force ◽  
Motor Unit Recruitment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document