INTERFACE SHEAR STRENGTH OF CONCRETE-TO-CONCRETE BOND WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECTING STEEL REINFORCEMENT

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazizah Ezdiani Mohamad ◽  
Izni Syahrizal Ibrahim

Composite concrete consists of two elements cast at different times which are the concrete base and concrete topping. To achieve composite action, interface shear strength must be sufficient to resist the sliding motion between the two concrete surfaces in contact. The interface shear strength is mainly depended on concrete cohesion, friction and dowel action. A total of 36 “push-off” tests were performed to study the interface shear strength and to assess the influence of surface texture and steel reinforcement crossing the interface. Three different concrete base surfaces are prepared which include smooth or “left as-cast”, roughened by wire-brushing in the transverse direction and steel reinforcement projecting from the concrete base. Eurocode 2 provides design equations for determining the interface shear strength with different surface textures and also the one where projecting steel reinforcement crosses the interface. The experimental results show that the transverse roughened surface produced the highest interface shear strength of 1.89 N/mm2 (σn = 0 N/mm2), 4.69 N/mm2 (σn = 0.5 N/mm2), 5.97 N/mm2 (σn = 1.0 N/mm2) and 6.42 N/mm2 (σn = 1.5 N/mm2) compared with the other surface textures. This proves that the increase in the degree of roughness contributes to higher concrete cohesion and friction coefficient. However, for the surface with projecting steel reinforcement, the failure is not sudden as experienced by the surface without one. This is due to the contribution of the clamping stress from the dowel action of the steel reinforcements. Meanwhile, for specimens without any projecting steel reinforcements, the interface shear strength depended solely on friction and concrete cohesion of the surface textures. The interface shear strength of surface with and without the projecting steel reinforcement can be predicted using the Mohr-Coulomb failure envelope. This paper also proposed design expressions for concrete-to-concrete bond on surfaces provided with and without projecting steel reinforcement that can be adopted in Eurocode 2.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0252050
Author(s):  
M. Yahya Al-Fasih ◽  
M. E. Mohamad ◽  
I. S. Ibrahim ◽  
Y. Ahmad ◽  
M. A. Mohd Ariffin ◽  
...  

Effects of different surface textures on the interface shear strength, interface slip, and failure modes of the concrete-to-concrete bond are examined through finite element numerical model and experimental methods in the presence of the horizontal load with ‘push-off’ technique under different normal stresses. Three different surface textures are considered; smooth, indented, and transversely roughened to finish the top surfaces of the concrete bases. In the three-dimensional modeling via the ABAQUS solver, the Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) is used to simulate the interface shear failure. It is observed that the interface shear strength increases with the applied normal stress. The transversely roughened surface achieves the highest interface shear strength compared with those finished with the indented and smooth approaches. The smooth and indented surfaces are controlled by the adhesive failure mode while the transversely roughened surface is dominated by the cohesive failure mode. Also, it is observed that the CZM approach can accurately model the interface shear failure with 3–29% differences between the modeled and the experimental test findings.


1987 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 824
Author(s):  
J.E. Bechtold ◽  
Y. Dohmae ◽  
R.E. Sherman ◽  
R.B. Gustilo

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Niklas Hansson ◽  
Stig Hansson

The surface roughness affects the bone response to dental implants. A primary aim of the roughness is to increase the bone-implant interface shear strength. Surface roughness is generally characterized by means of surface roughness parameters. It was demonstrated that the normally used parameters cannot discriminate between surfaces expected to give a high interface shear strength from surfaces expected to give a low interface shear strength. It was further demonstrated that the skewness parameter can do this discrimination. A problem with this parameter is that it is sensitive to isolated peaks and valleys. Another roughness parameter which on theoretical grounds can be supposed to give valuable information on the quality of a rough surface is kurtosis. This parameter is also sensitive to isolated peaks and valleys. An implant surface was assumed to have a fairly well-defined and homogenous “semiperiodic” surface roughness upon which isolated peaks were superimposed. In a computerized simulation, it was demonstrated that by using small sampling lengths during measurement, it should be possible to get accurate values of the skewness and kurtosis parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document