Evaluation of validity and limitations of the soybean canopy height‐to‐row spacing ratio as an onsite index to control weeds using diverse soybean accessions

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Shunji Kurokawa ◽  
Akito Kaga ◽  
Mai Tsuda ◽  
Daisuke Sekine ◽  
Tomoko Shibuya
1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred H. Yelverton ◽  
Harold D. Coble

In 1982 and 1983, effects of soybean row spacing and irrigation on weed resurgence following postemergence herbicide applications were evaluated. Also, ‘Forrest’ and ‘Ransom’ cultivar effects and early and late planting date influences on weed resurgence were evaluated in 1982 and 1983, respectively. In both years, as row spacing increased, weed resurgence increased. Photosynthetically active radiation measurements indicated the amount of weed resurgence coincided closely with the differing amounts of light penetrating to the soil surface. Irrigation, planting date, and cultivars showed no significant effect on weed resurgence. In 1982, a significant cultivar by row spacing interaction was obtained. In 1983, the late planting date showed a trend for less weed resurgence under irrigated conditions, although the difference was not significant. Soybean canopy measurements indicated development was greater under irrigation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1488-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane O. Hanna ◽  
Shawn P. Conley ◽  
Gregory E. Shaner ◽  
Judith B. Santini

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Nikola Arsenijevic ◽  
Ryan DeWerff ◽  
Shawn Conley ◽  
Matthew Ruark ◽  
Rodrigo Werle

The role of weed suppression by the cultivated crop is often overlooked in annual row cropping systems. Agronomic practices such as planting time, row spacing, tillage and herbicide selection may influence the time of crop canopy closure. The objective of this research was to evaluate the influence of the aforementioned agronomic practices and their interaction with the adoption of an effective preemergence (PRE) soil residual herbicide program on soybean canopy closure and yield. A field experiment was conducted in 2019 and 2020 at Arlington, WI as a 2×2×2×2 factorial in a randomized complete block design, including early (late-April) and standard (late-May) planting time, narrow (38 cm) and wide (76 cm) row spacing, conventional tillage and no-till, and soil-applied PRE herbicide (yes and no; flumioxazin 150 g ai ha−1 + metribuzin 449 g ai ha−1 + pyroxasulfone 190 g ai ha-1). All plots were maintained weed-free throughout the growing season. In both years, early planted soybeans reached 90% green canopy cover (T90) before (7 to 9 d difference) and yielded more (188 to 902 kg ha−1 difference) than the standard planted soybeans. Narrow-row soybeans reached T90 earlier than wide-row soybeans (4 to 7 d difference), but yield was similar between row spacing treatments. Conventional tillage had a higher yield when compared to a no-till system (377 kg ha−1 difference). The PRE herbicide slightly delayed T90 (4 d or less) but had no impact on yield. All practices investigated herein influenced the time of soybean canopy closure but only planting time and tillage impacted yield. Planting soybeans earlier and reducing their row spacing expedites the time to canopy closure. The potential delay in canopy development and yield loss if soybeans are allowed to compete with weeds early in the season would likely outweigh the slight delay in canopy development by an effective PRE herbicide.


Author(s):  
Kenneth T. Pecinovsky ◽  
Garren O. Benson ◽  
Dale E. Farnham
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Josh Sievers ◽  
Mark Licht
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document