Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for assessing surgical margins of canine soft tissue sarcomas in observers of different specialties

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Josephine A. Dornbusch ◽  
Laura E. Selmic ◽  
Pin‐Chieh Huang ◽  
Jonathan P. Samuelson ◽  
Eric M. McLaughlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Optical Coherence

Three-dimensional computational analysis of optical coherence tomography images for the detection of soft tissue sarcomas

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 021102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang Wang ◽  
Chih-Hao Liu ◽  
Valery P. Zakharov ◽  
Alexander J. Lazar ◽  
Raphael E. Pollock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Computational Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Optical Coherence

scholarly journals Intra‐operative imaging of surgical margins of canine soft tissue sarcoma using optical coherence tomography

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Selmic ◽  
Jonathan Samuelson ◽  
Jennifer K. Reagan ◽  
Kelly J. Mesa ◽  
Elizabeth Driskell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Optical Coherence

Computational analysis of optical coherence tomography images for the detection of soft tissue sarcomas

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang Wang ◽  
Narendran Sudheendran ◽  
Chih-Hao Liu ◽  
Ravi K. Manapuram ◽  
Valery P. Zakharov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Computational Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Optical Coherence

scholarly journals A handheld fiber-optic probe to enable optical coherence tomography of oral soft tissue

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Julia Walther ◽  
Jonas Golde ◽  
Marius Albrecht ◽  
Bryden Quirk ◽  
Loretta Scolaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Fiber Optic ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Fiber Optic Probe ◽  
Optic Probe ◽  
Oral Soft Tissue

scholarly journals 3D imaging of proximal caries in posterior teeth using optical coherence tomography

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Shimada ◽  
Michael F. Burrow ◽  
Kazuyuki Araki ◽  
Yuan Zhou ◽  
Keiichi Hosaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
3D Imaging ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Proximal Caries ◽  
X Ray

Abstract Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can create cross-sectional images of tooth without X-ray exposure. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 3D imaging of OCT for proximal caries in posterior teeth. Thirty-six human molar teeth with 51 proximal surfaces visibly 6 intact, 16 slightly demineralized, and 29 distinct carious changes were mounted to take digital radiographs and 3D OCT images. The sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of enamel caries and dentin caries were calculated to quantify the diagnostic ability of 3D OCT in comparison with digital radiography. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the agreement with histology using weighted Kappa. OCT showed significantly higher sensitivity, AUC and Kappa values than radiography. OCT can be a safer option for the diagnosis of proximal caries in posterior teeth that can be applied to the patients without X-ray exposure.

scholarly journals Comparison of two different optical coherence tomography angiography devices in detecting healthy versus glaucomatous eyes – an observational cross-sectional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Kee ◽  
V. C. H. Yip ◽  
E. L. T. Tay ◽  
C. W. Lim ◽  
J. Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Optic Disc ◽  
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Swept Source ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background To understand the differences between two different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) devices in detecting glaucomatous from healthy eyes by comparing their vascular parameters, diagnostic accuracy and test-retest reliability. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was performed on healthy and glaucoma subjects, on whom two sets of OCTA images of optic disc and macula were acquired using both AngioVue (Optovue, USA) and Swept Source (Topcon, Japan) OCTA devices during one visit. A novel in-house software was used to calculate the vessel densities. Diagnostic accuracy of the machines in differentiating healthy versus glaucomatous eyes was determined using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and test-retest repeatability of the machines was also evaluated. Results A total of 80 healthy and 38 glaucomatous eyes were evaluated. Glaucomatous eyes had reduced mean vessel density compared to healthy controls in all segmented layers of the optic disc and macula using AngioVue (p ≤ 0.001). However, glaucomatous eyes had higher mean vessel density on optic disc scans using Swept Source, with lack of statistically significant difference between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. The AUROC showed better diagnostic accuracy of AngioVue (0.761–1.000) compared to Swept Source (0.113–0.644). The test-retest reliability indices were generally better using AngioVue than Swept Source. Conclusions AngioVue showed better diagnostic capability and test-retest reliability compared to Swept Source. Further studies need to be undertaken to evaluate if there is any significant difference between the various machines in diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma.

The Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies of Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma

Ophthalmology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 114 (9) ◽  
pp. 1607-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoë K. Johnson ◽  
M.A. Rehman Siddiqui ◽  
Augusto Azuara-Blanco
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Quality Of Reporting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document