Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Single Port Access System in 15 Dogs

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen Simon ◽  
Eric Monnet
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Access System ◽  
Port Access

scholarly journals Single Port Access Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (with video)

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1015-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Bucher ◽  
François Pugin ◽  
Nicolas Buchs ◽  
Sandrine Ostermann ◽  
Fadi Charara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access

Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1138-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Langwieler ◽  
Thomas Nimmesgern ◽  
Melanie Back
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access

scholarly journals Single Port Access Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (with Video): Reply

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1150-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Bucher ◽  
Nicolas Buchs ◽  
François Pugin ◽  
Sandrine Ostermann ◽  
Philippe Morel
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access

scholarly journals COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Athayde MADUREIRA ◽  
Cristiane Luzia Teixeira GOMEZ ◽  
Eduardo Monteiro ALMEIDA
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Port Access

ABSTRACT Background: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. Aim: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. Methods: A total of 57 patients were randomly divided into two groups and submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=29) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single access (n=28). The patients were followed up and reviewed in a 40.4 month follow-up for identification of incisional hernias. Results: Follow-up showed 21,4% of incisional hernia in single port group and 3.57% in conventional technique. Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of late incisional hernia in patients submitted to single port access cholecystectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Single Port Access Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (with video): Letter to the Editor

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Papagoras ◽  
M. Kanara ◽  
Charilaos Argiropoulos-Rakas ◽  
G. Tsianos
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Letter To The Editor ◽  
Port Access

scholarly journals Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Innovative E. K. Glove Port: Our Experience

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elbert Khiangte ◽  
Iheule Newme ◽  
Karabi Patowary ◽  
Hitesh Kalita
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Developing Country ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Access System ◽  
Single Port Surgery ◽  
Port Access ◽  
Glove Port

The technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy continues to evolve with a trend towards decreasing use of working ports. One of the emerging concepts of 21st century is single-port surgery. It has further minimized the minimally invasive surgery. However, the main drawbacks of this technique are the lack of “triangulation” to which the laparoscopic surgeons have grown accustomed to, the clustering of instruments, and the costly multichannel ports, which are very costly and, in fact, are not affordable by the majority of the population in a developing country like India. From September 2009 to December 2011, 210 patients identified as having biliary colic, chronic cholecystitis, and previous biliary pancreatitis or obstructive jaundice due to stones (managed by ERCP) underwent single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the E. K. glove port. The operating time was reasonable and can be lessened with experience. Excellent exposure of the critical view was obtained in all cases. This technique is safe, feasible, reproducible, cheap, and easy to learn. It may be an alternative to the currently available single-port access system, especially in a developing country like India. If required, placement of the remaining two to three ports for a more conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be done.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document