Comparison of RNA isolation and library preparation methods for small RNA sequencing of canine biofluids

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candice P. Chu ◽  
Mary B. Nabity
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Baran-Gale ◽  
Michael R Erdos ◽  
Christina Sison ◽  
Alice Young ◽  
Emily E Fannin ◽  
...  

Recent advances in sequencing technology have helped unveil the unexpected complexity and diversity of small RNAs. A critical step in small RNA library preparation for sequencing is the ligation of adapter sequences to both the 5’ and 3’ ends of small RNAs. Two widely used protocols for small RNA library preparation, Illumina v1.5 and Illumina TruSeq, use different pairs of adapter sequences. In this study, we compare the results of small RNA-sequencing between v1.5 and TruSeq and observe a striking differential bias. Nearly 100 highly expressed microRNAs (miRNAs) are >5-fold differentially detected and 48 miRNAs are >10-fold differentially detected between the two methods of library preparation. In fact, some miRNAs, such as miR-24-3p, are over 30-fold differentially detected. The results are reproducible across different sequencing centers (NIH and UNC) and both major Illumina sequencing platforms, GAIIx and HiSeq. While some level of bias in library preparation is not surprising, the apparent massive differential bias between these two widely used adapter sets is not well appreciated. As increasingly more laboratories transition to the newer TruSeq-based library preparation for small RNAs, researchers should be aware of the extent to which the results may differ from previously published results using v1.5.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. e80-e80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Maguire ◽  
Gregory J S Lohman ◽  
Shengxi Guan

Abstract Small RNAs are important regulators of gene expression and are involved in human development and disease. Next generation sequencing (NGS) allows for scalable, genome-wide studies of small RNA; however, current methods are challenged by low sensitivity and high bias, limiting their ability to capture an accurate representation of the cellular small RNA population. Several studies have shown that this bias primarily arises during the ligation of single-strand adapters during library preparation, and that this ligation bias is magnified by 2′-O-methyl modifications (2′OMe) on the 3′ terminal nucleotide. In this study, we developed a novel library preparation process using randomized splint ligation with a cleavable adapter, a design which resolves previous challenges associated with this ligation strategy. We show that a randomized splint ligation based workflow can reduce bias and increase the sensitivity of small RNA sequencing for a wide variety of small RNAs, including microRNA (miRNA) and tRNA fragments as well as 2′OMe modified RNA, including Piwi-interacting RNA and plant miRNA. Finally, we demonstrate that this workflow detects more differentially expressed miRNA between tumorous and matched normal tissues. Overall, this library preparation process allows for highly accurate small RNA sequencing and will enable studies of 2′OMe modified RNA with new levels of detail.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger P. Alexander ◽  
MD Giraldez ◽  
RM Spengler ◽  
A Etheridge ◽  
PM Godoy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger P. Alexander ◽  
MD Giraldez ◽  
RM Spengler ◽  
A Etheridge ◽  
PM Godoy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Wright ◽  
Anandita Rajpurohit ◽  
Emily E. Burke ◽  
Courtney Williams ◽  
Leonardo Collado-Torres ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTHigh-throughput sequencing offers advantages over other quantification methods for microRNA (miRNA), yet numerous biases make reliable quantification challenging. Previous evaluations of the biases associated with small RNA sequencing have focused on adapter ligation bias with limited evaluation of reverse transcription or amplification biases. Furthermore, evaluations of the accuracy of quantifications of isomiRs (miRNA isoforms) or the influence of starting amount on performance have been very limited and no study has yet evaluated differences in the quantification of isomiRs of altered length. In addition, no studies have yet compared the consistency of results derived from multiple moderate starting inputs. We therefore evaluated quantifications of miRNA and isomiRs using four library preparation kits, with various starting amounts, as well as quantifications following removal of duplicate reads using unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) to mitigate reverse transcription and amplification biases. All methods resulted in false isomiR detection; however, the adapter-free method tested was especially prone to false isomiR detection. We demonstrate that using UMIs improves accuracy and we provide a guide for input amounts to improve consistency. Our data show differences and limitations of current methods, thus raising concerns about the validity of quantification of miRNA and isomiRs across studies. We advocate for the use of UMIs to improve accuracy and reliability of miRNA quantifications.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger P. Alexander ◽  
MD Giraldez ◽  
RM Spengler ◽  
A Etheridge ◽  
PM Godoy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 1085-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Li ◽  
Karolina Elżbieta Kaczor-Urbanowicz ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Blanca Majem ◽  
Hsien-Chun Lo ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND It was recently discovered that abundant and stable extracellular RNA (exRNA) species exist in bodily fluids. Saliva is an emerging biofluid for biomarker development for noninvasive detection and screening of local and systemic diseases. Use of RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) to profile exRNA is rapidly growing; however, no single preparation and analysis protocol can be used for all biofluids. Specifically, RNA-Seq of saliva is particularly challenging owing to high abundance of bacterial contents and low abundance of salivary exRNA. Given the laborious procedures needed for RNA-Seq library construction, sequencing, data storage, and data analysis, saliva-specific and optimized protocols are essential. METHODS We compared different RNA isolation methods and library construction kits for long and small RNA sequencing. The role of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depletion also was evaluated. RESULTS The miRNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen) showed the highest total RNA yield (70.8 ng/mL cell-free saliva) and best small RNA recovery, and the NEBNext library preparation kits resulted in the highest number of detected human genes [5649–6813 at 1 reads per kilobase RNA per million mapped (RPKM)] and small RNAs [482–696 microRNAs (miRNAs) and 190–214 other small RNAs]. The proportion of human RNA-Seq reads was much higher in rRNA-depleted saliva samples (41%) than in samples without rRNA depletion (14%). In addition, the transfer RNA (tRNA)-derived RNA fragments (tRFs), a novel class of small RNAs, were highly abundant in human saliva, specifically tRF-4 (4%) and tRF-5 (15.25%). CONCLUSIONS Our results may help in selection of the best adapted methods of RNA isolation and small and long RNA library constructions for salivary exRNA studies.


2020 ◽  
pp. 109158182096151
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Shing ◽  
Kai Schaefer ◽  
Shaun E. Grosskurth ◽  
Andy H. Vo ◽  
Tatiana Sharapova ◽  
...  

Predictive indicators of testicular toxicity could improve drug development by allowing early in-life screening for this adverse effect before it becomes severe. We hypothesized that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) could serve as testicular toxicity biomarkers in dogs. Herein, we describe the results of an exploratory study conducted to discover biomarkers of drug-induced testicular injury. Following a dose-selection study using the testicular toxicant ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME), we chose a dose of 50 mg/kg/d EGME to avoid systemic toxicity and treated 2 groups of dogs (castrated, non-castrated) for 14 to 28 days. Castrated animals were used as negative controls to identify biomarkers specific for testicular toxicity because EGME can cause toxicity to organ systems in addition to the testis. Blood was collected daily during the dosing period, followed by recovery for 29 to 43 days with less frequent sampling. Dosing was well tolerated, resulting in mild-to-moderate degeneration in testes and epididymides. Global profiling of serum miRNAs at selected dosing and recovery time points was completed by small RNA sequencing. Bioinformatics data analysis using linear modeling demonstrated several circulating miRNAs that were differentially abundant during the dosing period compared with baseline and/or castrated control samples. Confirmatory reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction data in these animals was unable to detect sustained alterations of miRNAs in serum, except for 1 potential candidate cfa-miR-146b. Taken together, we report the results of a comprehensive exploratory study and suggest future directions for follow-up research to address the challenge of developing diagnostic biomarkers of testicular toxicity.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 964
Author(s):  
Sarka Benesova ◽  
Mikael Kubista ◽  
Lukas Valihrach

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small RNA molecules that have an important regulatory role in multiple physiological and pathological processes. Their disease-specific profiles and presence in biofluids are properties that enable miRNAs to be employed as non-invasive biomarkers. In the past decades, several methods have been developed for miRNA analysis, including small RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Small RNA-seq enables genome-wide profiling and analysis of known, as well as novel, miRNA variants. Moreover, its high sensitivity allows for profiling of low input samples such as liquid biopsies, which have now found applications in diagnostics and prognostics. Still, due to technical bias and the limited ability to capture the true miRNA representation, its potential remains unfulfilled. The introduction of many new small RNA-seq approaches that tried to minimize this bias, has led to the existence of the many small RNA-seq protocols seen today. Here, we review all current approaches to cDNA library construction used during the small RNA-seq workflow, with particular focus on their implementation in commercially available protocols. We provide an overview of each protocol and discuss their applicability. We also review recent benchmarking studies comparing each protocol’s performance and summarize the major conclusions that can be gathered from their usage. The result documents variable performance of the protocols and highlights their different applications in miRNA research. Taken together, our review provides a comprehensive overview of all the current small RNA-seq approaches, summarizes their strengths and weaknesses, and provides guidelines for their applications in miRNA research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document