Determination of the safe range of graft size mismatch using body surface area index in deceased liver transplantation

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 724-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyota Fukazawa ◽  
Yoshitsugu Yamada ◽  
Seigo Nishida ◽  
Taizo Hibi ◽  
Kris L. Arheart ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyota Fukazawa ◽  
Seigo Nishida ◽  
Alex Volsky ◽  
Andreas G. Tzakis ◽  
Ernesto A. Pretto

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
JC Sneddon ◽  
R Walton ◽  
A Bond

AbstractThis study aimed to produce a weight-independent algorithm for determination of body surface area (BSA; cm2) to within 5% accuracy of the directly determined value in selected horses and ponies under field conditions. Quantification of BSA in equines has applications in the fields of energy budgeting, growth, thermoregulation, conformation and drug kinetics. A simple algorithm for determining BSA to ±5% accuracy was produced for Shetland ponies, Shire horses, Welsh Mountain Section A ponies and Hanoverian mature horses and foals. The accuracy of the method was ±8% for Welsh Mountain-type ponies and Hanoverian two-year-olds. The data were produced by tiling of the shoulder region on one side of the animal with chalk and adapting a simple geometrical integrative technique. Linear anthropometric measurements were of limited use in predicting BSA in that they produced algorithms of ±5% accuracy for ponies of uniform conformation only (Welsh Mountain Section A ponies). The relevant equations were: for Arab-based breeds (Welsh Mountain-type and Section A ponies and Hanoverian horses and foals) and for UK native breeds (Shetland ponies and Shire horses), where ‘surface area of shoulder region on one side’ was defined by the anterior margins of the supraspinatus and deep pectoral, and the posterior margin of the triceps muscles. This tiling procedure fulfilled the aim of the study and also provided quantitative information on proportional differences in areas of body regions between and within these selected breeds.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Cases ◽  
T Zhu ◽  
U Jurt ◽  
D Brouillard ◽  
M Matangi

Abstract INTRODUCTION A patient with aortic stenosis with an AVA of 1.22 cm2 who stands 5’ 6" and weighs 145 lb has a BSA of 1.76m2 (AV area index = 0.69 cm2/m2). If the same patient weighs 200 lbs, the BSA increases to 2.09 m2 (AV area index 0.58 cm2/m2). Their calculated AV area index therefore changes from the moderate range to the severe range. PURPOSE To determine from our ECHO database the effect the current obesity epidemic has on all ECHO variables that are indexed to BSA. METHODS Our ECHO database was searched for all patients with the required data variables, gender, age, height (cm)and body weight (kg) were required. Duplicate patients with multiple ECHO studies were removed, only the first ECHO entry being included. Obvious data entry errors were removed (e.g. height 1866 cm, or weight 8.6 kg). Ideal weight was calculated using the Devine formula, ideal weight = Constant + 2.3x[height in inches-60], where constant= 50kg in males and 45.5kg in females. Body surface area in m2 was calculated = [√(height in cm x weight in Kg)/3600]. The paired t-test was used to determine differences between means. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS There were 47,761 ECHO studies entered into the database, of which 46,605 (98%) had all the required fields completed. Once duplicates were removed (-15,903) and erroneous data deleted (-158, 0.33%), 30,536 remained. There were 16,160 females aged 58.7 ± 19.2 years, with a mean height of 161.7 ± 7.2cm and 14,376 males aged 59.8 ± 19.2 years, with a mean height of 176.7 ± 7.6 cm. There were statistically significant differences in both men and women between actual and ideal weight and actual and ideal BSA, see Table 1. CONLUSIONS. For all ECHO measurements where the value is frequently indexed a decision needs to be made to either use the actual BSA or the ideal BSA. It may be more practical to use the ideal BSA which will remain consistent throughout follow up. Using our data any such measurement for females could be multiplied by 1.16 and for males 1.11 (i.e. actual BSA/ideal BSA). It is disappointing to find that, on average, females are 20 kilograms and males 18 kilograms above their ideal weight. Table 1. Weight females (kg) Weight males (kg) BSA females (m2) BSA males (m2) Number. 16,160 14,376 16,160 14,376 Actual. 73.2 ± 18.9 89.1 ± 19.3 1.80 ± 0.24 2.08 ± 0.24 Ideal. 53.4 ± 6.5 71.4 ± 6.9 1.55 ± 0.13 1.87 ± 0.3 P value. <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 BSA = Body surface area.


Burns ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1183-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Yuang Yu ◽  
Yao-Wen Hsu ◽  
Chih-Yong Chen

Burns ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. S115
Author(s):  
A. Almeida ◽  
L. Ramos ◽  
P. Moniz ◽  
D. Casal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document