scholarly journals Impact of lenalidomide‐based induction therapy on the mobilization of CD34 + cells, blood graft cellular composition, and post‐transplant recovery in myeloma patients: a prospective multicenter study

Transfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 2366-2372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anu Partanen ◽  
Jaakko Valtola ◽  
Raija Silvennoinen ◽  
Antti Ropponen ◽  
Timo Siitonen ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaakko Valtola ◽  
Raija Silvennoinen ◽  
Antti Ropponen ◽  
Timo Siitonen ◽  
Marjaana Säily ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2926-2926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Nicholas M. Fisher ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Michael H. Tomasson ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
...  

Abstract Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a selective inhibitor of the proteasome approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Emerging evidence indicates that bortezomib is also effective alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents in the front-line treatment of myeloma. Given the superiority of high dose therapy with autologous transplant compared to conventional therapy in myeloma, the application of bortezomib to novel front-line therapies depends in part on its effects on subsequent stem cell mobilization and engraftment. Previous reports have demonstrated successful chemotherapy induced mobilization of stem cells following bortezomib. To determine the effects of bortezomib on cytokine mobilization and engraftment of stem cells, we conducted a study of bortezomib administered prior to high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant. Following induction therapy, two cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 were administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. One week after the last dose of bortezomib, stem cells were mobilized with G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day for 5 days and harvested by large volume apheresis (20 L/day) until a minimum of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Melphalan 100 mg/m2/day x 2 days was administered followed by reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells 48 hours later. GM-CSF 250 mcg/m2/day was given post-transplant until the ANC ≥ 1,500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days. Forty patients were enrolled in this study with 37 continuing on to autologous transplant. Study population consists of 24 male and 16 female patients with the median age at enrollment of 56 years (range 38–69). Myeloma characteristics at diagnosis were as follows (number of patients): IgG (29), IgA (10), light chain only (1), with stage I (1), II (12), or stage III (27) disease. Prior to receiving bortezomib, 20 patients had been previously treated with an anthracycline containing regimen and 22 with thalidomide for induction therapy. Two patients did not receive any prior chemotherapy. Two patients did not proceed to stem cell harvest, one secondary to disease progression on bortezomib and the other because of a stroke suffered during G-CSF mobilization. Stem cell collection was successful in 37 of 38 patients with the first collection containing a median of 4.24 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The majority of patients (29) required a single pheresis session, 7 required two sessions, and 1 patient required 5 sessions. The only patient failing stem cell collection had received extensive radiation to the pelvis in addition to a prior history of breast cancer for which she received adjuvant chemotherapy. All transplanted patients successfully engrafted with a median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥ 500/mm3) of 11 days (range 9–14 days). Platelet engraftment (platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 sustained for 7 days without transfusion) occurred at a median of 11 days (range 9–31 days). In an intention-to-treat analysis at 100 days post-transplant, we observed a compete response (CR) in 6 patients (15%), a near CR in 10 patients (25%) with an additional 19 partial responses (48%) for an overall response rate of 88%. We conclude that pre-transplant treatment with 2 cycles of bortezomib following anthracycline or thalidomide containing chemotherapy does not adversely affect stem cell yield or time to engraftment and results in high CR / near CR rates.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Maida ◽  
G Morreale ◽  
E Sinagra ◽  
M Manganaro ◽  
D Schillaci ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (21) ◽  
pp. 825-833
Author(s):  
Zoltán Döbrönte ◽  
Mária Szenes ◽  
Beáta Gasztonyi ◽  
Lajos Csermely ◽  
Márta Kovács ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recent guidelines recommend routine pulse oximetric monitoring during endoscopy, however, this has not been the common practice yet in the majority of the local endoscopic units. Aims: To draw attention to the importance of the routine use of pulse oximetric recording during endoscopy. Method: A prospective multicenter study was performed with the participation of 11 gastrointestinal endoscopic units. Data of pulse oximetric monitoring of 1249 endoscopic investigations were evaluated, of which 1183 were carried out with and 66 without sedation. Results: Oxygen saturation less than 90% was observed in 239 cases corresponding to 19.1% of all cases. It occurred most often during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (31.2%) and proximal enteroscopy (20%). Procedure-related risk factors proved to be the long duration of the investigation, premedication with pethidine (31.3%), and combined sedoanalgesia with pethidine and midazolam (34.38%). The age over 60 years, obesity, consumption of hypnotics or sedatives, severe cardiopulmonary state, and risk factor scores III and IV of the American Society of Anestwere found as patient-related risk factors. Conclusion: To increase the safety of patients undergoing endoscopic investigation, pulse oximeter and oxygen supplementation should be the standard requirement in all of the endoscopic investigation rooms. Pulse oximetric monitoring is advised routinely during endoscopy with special regard to the risk factors of hypoxemia. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 825–833.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document