Action Production and Event Perception as Routine Sequential Behaviors

This volume explores questions not only related to traditional sensory perception, but also to proprioceptive, interoceptive, multisensory, and event perception, expanding traditional notions of the influence that conscious non-visual experience has on human behavior and rationality. Some essays investigate the role that emotions play in decision-making and agential perception and what this means for justifications of belief and knowledge; analyze the notion that some sensory experiences, such as touch, have epistemic privilege over others, as well as the relationship between perception and introspection, and the relationship between action perception and belief; and engage with topics in aesthetics and the philosophy of art, exploring the role that artworks can play in providing us with perceptional knowledge of emotions.

Download Full-text

Syntax and compositionality in animal communication

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences ◽

10.1098/rstb.2019.0062 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 375 (1789) ◽

pp. 20190062 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Klaus Zuberbühler

Keyword(s):

Hierarchical Structure ◽

Short Term Memory ◽

Animal Communication ◽

Artificial Grammar ◽

Structural Flexibility ◽

Event Perception ◽

Evolutionary Transition ◽

Theme Issue ◽

Short Term ◽

Term Memory

Syntax has been found in animal communication but only humans appear to have generative, hierarchically structured syntax. How did syntax evolve? I discuss three theories of evolutionary transition from animal to human syntax: computational capacity, structural flexibility and event perception. The computation hypothesis is supported by artificial grammar experiments consistently showing that only humans can learn linear stimulus sequences with an underlying hierarchical structure, a possible by-product of computationally powerful large brains. The structural flexibility hypothesis is supported by evidence of meaning-bearing combinatorial and permutational signal sequences in animals, with sometimes compositional features, but no evidence for generativity or hierarchical structure. Again, animals may be constrained by computational limits in short-term memory but possibly also by limits in articulatory control and social cognition. The event categorization hypothesis, finally, posits that humans are cognitively predisposed to analyse natural events by assigning agency and assessing how agents impact on patients, a propensity that is reflected by the basic syntactic units in all languages. Whether animals perceive natural events in the same way is largely unknown, although event perception may provide the cognitive grounding for syntax evolution. This article is part of the theme issue ‘What can animal communication teach us about human language?’

Download Full-text

The development of event perception and memory

Cognitive Development ◽

10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100848 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 54 ◽

pp. 100848

Author(s):

Yinyuan Zheng ◽

Jeffrey M. Zacks ◽

Lori Markson

Keyword(s):

Event Perception

Download Full-text

Speech processes in the light of event perception and action theory

Journal of Phonetics ◽

10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30596-0 ◽

1986 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 1 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Björn Lindblom

Keyword(s):

Perception And Action ◽

Action Theory ◽

Event Perception

Download Full-text

Biological Motion Perception: From Inversion to Upright Display Orientation

Perception ◽

10.1068/v96l0203 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽

pp. 118-118

Author(s):

M A Pavlova

Keyword(s):

Motion Perception ◽

Biological Motion ◽

Presentation Rate ◽

Event Perception ◽

Veridical Perception ◽

Invariant Structure ◽

Upright Orientation ◽

Biological Motion Perception ◽

The Right ◽

Perception Of Biological Motion

How does biological motion perception change with display orientation? As previously shown, display inversion (180°) completely prevents veridical perception of biological motion. However, with upright orientation (0°), observers are able to recover the invariant structure through biological motion despite reverse transformation (showing the film backwards) or changing the presentation rate (Pavlova, 1995 Perception24 Supplement, 112). In the present experiments, observers saw the biological motion pattern at various display deviations, from inverted to upright orientation (180°, 150°, 120°, 90°, 60°, 30°, 0°), in the right or left hemifield, on a circular screen monitor. The display consisted of an array of 11 dots on the main joints of an invisible walker moving as if on a treadmill. While viewing (60 s), observers pressed a key each time their perception changed from one stable percept to another (eg when the direction of apparent rotation of the pattern reversed). The perceived multistability (the number of key-presses) increased as orientation was varied from inverted to 90°, and then decreased between 90° and upright. The recognition of walking figure improved abruptly with changing orientation: at deviations of 60° and 30° most observer reported seeing the walking figure spontaneously, yet the pattern was seen as multistable. The findings imply the relative power of constraints (such as orientation) in perception of biological motion that is discussed in relation to the KSD principle in event perception [Runeson, 1994, in Perceiving Events and Objects Eds Jansson, Epstein, Bergström (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum) pp 383 – 405].

Download Full-text