Pain control and functional improvement in patients treated by autologous conditioned serum after failure of platelet rich plasma treatments in knee osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Leone ◽  
Alessandro Rosa ◽  
Paola Iudicone ◽  
Daniela Fioravanti ◽  
Giuseppe Capua ◽  
...  
Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. e24107
Author(s):  
Li Bocun ◽  
Li Jing ◽  
Li Jia ◽  
Qian Tan ◽  
Jianyi Chen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901988766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qipeng Wu ◽  
Xuefen Luo ◽  
Yuan Xiong ◽  
Guohui Liu ◽  
Junwen Wang ◽  
...  

Osteoarthritis (OA) is an extremely common form of chronic joint disease which can affect the knees and other joints of older adults, leading to debilitating disability in the knee and consequent reduction in quality of life. Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are effective for maintaining long-term beneficial effects without increasing the risk of intra-articular infection. However, few studies have compared the relative value of HA and PRP for OA treatment. PRP is more effective than HA for OA treatment in recent studies of this topic. We systematically searched Medline, SpringerLink, Embase, Pubmed, Clinical Trials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and OVID for all articles published through May 2018. Any study was included that compared the effect of HA and PRP (consistent treatment cycle and frequency of injection) on patient’s pain levels and functionality improvements. Review Manager 5.3 was used to analyze data regarding these two primary outcomes. We included 10 total studies in the present meta-analysis. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC; MD: 10.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.13 to 11.62, p < 0.00001), Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC; MD: −20.69, 95% CI: −24.50 to −16.89, p < 0.00001, I2 = 94%), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; MD: −1.50, 95% CI: −1.61 to −1.38, p < 0.00001, I2 = 90%) differed significantly between the PRP and HA groups. Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOSs) did not differ significantly ( χ2 = 23.53, I2 = 41%, p = 0.11). Our hypothesis appears not to be confirmed because PRP and HA did not differ significantly with respect to KOOS score. However, the IKDC, WOMAC, and VAS scores differed significantly. Thus, based on the current evidence, PRP appears to be better than HA at achieving pain relief and self-reported functional improvement. Ia, meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials.


Author(s):  
Alireza Pishgahi ◽  
Rozita Abolhasan ◽  
Seyed Kazem Shakouri ◽  
Mohammad Sadegh Soltani-Zangbar ◽  
Shahla Dareshiri ◽  
...  

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the common degenerative articular disorders that are related to decreased quality of life. Currently, novel biologic therapeutic approaches are introduced in the literature for OA management. In this study, the clinical efficiency of Dextrose prolotherapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and autologous conditioned serum (ACS) injection on the level of pain and function in Knee OA were compared. A randomized clinical trial was directed on 92 knee OA patients. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: 30 were received dextrose prolotherapy once in a week for three weeks, 30 received autologous PRP for two times with seven days interval, and in the remaining 32 patients 2ml of ACS were injected two times every seven days. Study participants were measured through the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, the visual analogue scale (VAS), at baseline, 1 and 6 months post-intervention. Both ACS and PRP treated patients showed improvement in pain intensity and knee function during 1 and 6 months pursue; however, this progress was more significant in the ACS group. Dextrose prolotherapy showed no substantial changes in pain and function of the affected knee in treated patients. Treatment of Knee OA with ACS and PRP injections are associated with pain reduction and knee function improvement. Not only, ACS therapy is more effective than that of PRP, but also due to its less variability in processing and less reported side effects, it could be considered as a safe and effective non-surgical alternative for OA management.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 3057-3064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Nur Kesiktas ◽  
Bahar Dernek ◽  
Ekin Ilke Sen ◽  
Havva Nur Albayrak ◽  
Tugba Aydin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction/objectives Intra-articular injections may be useful in terms of pain and functional status, in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Besides hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), peptide molecules recently begin to be used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intra-articular peptide Prostrolane® (CAREGEN Co. Ltd.) injection with that of the HA and PRP in the persons with OA. Method Fifty-four patients with OA were included in this prospective, randomized study. Patients were randomized into three groups as intra-articular HA, peptide, and PRP groups. Paracetamol was permitted three times a day to all groups. All the patients were evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and during movements. Measurements performed at the baseline, after the first week of injection, and at the first and third months of follow-up. Results Mean age was 55.8 ± 8.9 years. Forty-four (81.6%) were women. A week after the injections, rest and movement pain severity was measured by VAS decreased significantly in all the study groups (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of first week pain relief (p > 0.05). WOMAC pain, stiffness, function, and total scores were improved significantly in all the groups a week after the injections (p < 0.05). Improvement continued at the third month control; however, the improvement in the WOMAC pain score was significantly better in the peptide group at the third month control (p < 0.05). The decrease in the rest and movement pain was continued for 3 months except the HA group’s rest pain. There were no differences among the groups for all measurements, except for the WOMAC pain score at 3 months after treatment, which was significantly lower in the peptide group. Conclusion As a result, pain relief and functional improvement were obtained after the intra-articular HA, peptide, and PRP injections in OA, and decrease in pain was better in the peptide group. Key Points• The short-term effects of intra-articular HA, peptide, and PRP injections were compared in knee osteoarthritis.• HA, peptide, and PRP injections may be useful in pain relief and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 652-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Fotouhi ◽  
Arash Maleki ◽  
Sanam Dolati ◽  
Ali Aghebati-Maleki ◽  
Leili Aghebati-Maleki

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Guillibert ◽  
Caroline Charpin ◽  
Marie Raffray ◽  
Annie Benmenni ◽  
Francois-Xavier Dehaut ◽  
...  

Background: Evidence is growing regarding the ability of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections to enhance functional capacity and alleviate pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, heterogeneity in common practice regarding PRP preparation and biological content makes the initiation of this activity in a hospital complex. The aim of this study was to document the efficacy of a single PRP injection to treat knee OA and validate a routine care procedure. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with symptomatic knee OA received a single injection of large volume of very pure PRP. They were assessed at baseline and after one, three and six months, by measuring Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS), Observed Pain after a 50-foot walk test and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) analysis was performed at baseline and six months after the procedure. The objective was to recover 50% of responders three months after the procedure using OMERACT-OARSI criteria. Results: A single administration of high volume pure PRP provided significant clinical benefit for 84.2% of the responders, three months after the procedure. The KOOS total score significantly increased from 43.5 ± 14.3 to 66.4 ± 21.7 six months after the procedure (p < 0.001). Pain also significantly decreased from 37.5 ± 25.1 to 12.9 ± 20.9 (p < 0.001). No difference was observed on MRI parameters. Conclusion: A single injection of large volume of very pure PRP is associated with significant functional improvement and pain relief, allowing initiation of daily PRP injection within our hospital.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-142
Author(s):  
Md Saydur Rahman ◽  
Syed Ariful Islam ◽  
Md Jobayer Hossain ◽  
Muhammad Shamsul Arefin ◽  
Md Imrul Islam ◽  
...  

Background: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is increasingly applied in clinical practice to treat knee degenerative pathology. Both PRP and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been extensively used to improve lubrication, modulate inflammation and modify the catabolic micro-environment of the joint. Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the potential synergistic effects of PRP in combination with hyaluronic acid in primary knee osteoarthritis. Methodology: This randomized control trial was carried out on adult patients with primary knee osteoarthritis who attended the Pain Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period of September 2015 to August 2017. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups designated as group P (control group) who were only treated with PRP and group PH (experimental group) who were treated with the combination of PRP and hyaluronic acid. After providing the allocated treatment, all patients were undergone follow-up examination at 1st week, 1st month and 3rd month for pain improvement by VAS scale and for functional improvement by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Results: A total number of 34 patients were recruited for this study. Visual analogue score 1st month (5.85±0.83) and 3rd month (3.01±0.12) follow up showed statistically significant difference among two group (p=0.001). Inter group comparison showed that, mean VAS score of group PH (3.01±0.12) decreased more than Group P (4.01±1.01). In case of functional improvement, group PH also showed statistically better improvement during 1st month (45.76±3.25) and 3rd month (62.06±5.37) follow up than Group P. Conclusion: In conclusion articular platelet rich plasma in combination with hyaluronic acid provide better pain relief and improvement of functional status than PRP therapy alone in primary knee osteoarthritis. Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, 2019;5(2): 137-142


Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1418-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhong Han ◽  
Hetao Huang ◽  
Jianke Pan ◽  
Jiongtong Lin ◽  
Lingfeng Zeng ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of PRP and HA in KOA patients were retrieved from each database from the establishment date to April 2018. Outcome measurements were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee, and Lequesne Index scores and adverse events. The pooled data were evaluated with Review Manager 5.3.5. Results Fifteen RCTs (N = 1,314) were included in our meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis indicated that PRP injections reduced pain more effectively than HA injections in patients with KOA at six and 12 months of follow-up, as evaluated by the WOMAC pain score; the VAS pain score showed a significant difference at 12 months. Moreover, better functional improvement was observed in the PRP group, as demonstrated by the WOMAC function score at three, six, and 12 months. Additionally, PRP injections did not display different adverse event rates compared with HA injections. Conclusion In terms of long-term pain relief and functional improvement, PRP injections might be more effective than HA injections as a treatment for KOA. The optimal dosage, the timing interval and frequency of injections, and the ideal treatment for different stages of KOA remain areas of concern for future investigations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document