Impact of broad‐spectrum antibiotic exposures and multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacteremia on hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaweta Kaundal ◽  
Aditya Jandial ◽  
Harmandeep Singh ◽  
Madhu Chopra ◽  
Kripa Shanker Kasudhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Broad Spectrum Antibiotic ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Transplantation Outcomes

Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation - a Retrospective Single Center Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3888-3888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Heidenreich ◽  
Florian Nolte ◽  
Sebastian Kreil ◽  
Marc Reinwald ◽  
Wolf-Karsten Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Bacterial Pathogens ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumonia ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Allogeneic Hct

Abstract Multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens (MRP) such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are an emerging challenge in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, to our knowledge there are no data in the existing literature on the prevalence of MRP and of the impact of these multidrug-resistant pathogens on the outcome after allogeneic HCT. Thus, it was the purpose of this study to systematically analyze the issue of MRP in patients who underwent allogeneic HCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 06/2010 to 12/2013 a total number of 72 (F: n=23; M: n=49) consecutive patients who received the first allogeneic HCT at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The underlying diseases were AML (n=44), ALL (n=5), CML (n=4), MPN (n=2), lymphoma (n=5), MDS (n=9), and multiple myeloma (n=3). The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 23 patients and reduced intensity in 49 patients. Patients were transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (n=69) or bone marrow (n=3) from matched siblings (n=19), matched unrelated (n=45), mismatched (n=5) or haploidentical donors (n=3). As baseline investigation before commencing with the conditioning all patients underwent a comprehensive screening for MRP, i.e. ESBL, VRE and MRSA. For that reason swabs from nose, throat, axilla, urethra and anus as well as stool and urine were collected. The same screening was performed at discharge from hospital after allogeneic HCT and in case of a new admission into our institution. In addition routine microbiological investigations such as bacterial cultures from blood, urine, swabs, stool or central venous catheters were performed whenever clinically needed. Multidrug-resistant gram negative bacteria were categorized as 4MRGN (resistant to cephalosporins, piperacillin, fluorochinolones and to carbapenems) or as 3MRGN (resistant to 3 of these 4 antimicrobial drug groups). The primary endpoint of this analysis was day 100 non relapse mortality (NRM). Secondary endpoints were NRM and overall survival (OAS) two years post HCT. RESULTS: 23 out of 72 patients (32%) were colonized by multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens (MRP+ group) either at baseline (baseline MRP+ group, n=13, 18%) or at any other time point until day 100 post transplantation. Four patients were positive for two MRP either simultaneously at baseline (n=1) or at different time points (n=3). Detected MRP (n=27) were as follows: 3MRGN Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumonia (n=11), 4MRGN Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, n=4), 3MRGN P. aeruginosa (n=2), 4MRGN Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=1), 3MRGN Citrobacter freundii (n=1), VRE (n=7) and MRSA (n=1). Out of these 23 patients 7 patients developed an infection with MRP after HCT: Septicemia with 3MRGN Escherichia coli (n=3), septicemia with 3MRGN Klebsiella pneumonia (n=1), septicemia with P. aeruginosa (4 MRGN n=2, 3MRGN n=1) and one patient with VRE septicemia and 4MRGN P. aeruginosa pneumonia. Out of the 4 patients with multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa infection three died transplant related (two of these patients had been already colonized with 4MRGN P. aeruginosa at baseline). However, 2-year OAS of MRP colonized versus non-colonized patients was essentially the same (66.6% versus 63.0%, median follow up 23.8 months range 7.0 to 48.0 months). Day 100 NRM was higher in the baseline MRP+ group and in the entire MRP+ group in comparison with non-multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens colonized patients (23.1% and 17.4% versus 10.2%, not statistically significant [ns]). Data for 2 year NRM were 32.7%, 22.2% and 17.1% (ns), respectively. The increased NRM of MRP+ patients was mainly due to the high NRM of patients infected by multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: Colonization or infection with 3MRGN gram negative non-P. aeruginosa enterobacteriaceae or by VRE has no negative impact on the outcome after allogeneic HCT. Thus allogeneic HCT of patients colonized by MRP is feasible. However, patients colonized by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa seem to have a dismal outcome. Allogeneic HCT of these patients should be considered with care. We therefore suggest to include screening for MRP in the pretransplant recipient work up particularly to identify patients colonized by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Antimicrobial de-escalation in adult hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 632-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan M Petteys ◽  
Ekaterina Kachur ◽  
Kelly E Pillinger ◽  
Jiaxian He ◽  
Edward A Copelan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Unknown Origin ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Recovery ◽  
Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Background The optimal duration of empiric antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenia of unknown origin is unclear. This study evaluated outcomes in autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin who received early de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials prior to hematopoietic recovery versus those who continued broad-spectrum antimicrobials until hematopoietic recovery. Methods A single-center, retrospective study assessed hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin. Patients were categorized into either cohort 1, representing early de-escalation prior to hematopoietic recovery, or cohort 2, representing continuation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials until hematopoietic recovery. Results A total of 107 patients were included (22.4% in cohort 1 and 77.6% in cohort 2). Most patients (87.5%) in cohort 1 underwent haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation, whereas 84.3% of patients in cohort 2 received autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. There were no significant differences in rates of recurrent fever (4.2% versus 7.2%, in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, adjusted odds ratio = 0.84, P = 0.85), re-escalation (4.2% versus 4.8%, adjusted odds ratio = 1.57, P = 0.64), and Clostridioides difficile-associated infections (4.2% versus 2.4%, adjusted odds ratio = 2.27, P = 0.43). No patient experienced in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit admission, or bacteremia. Conclusion Hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin in which broad-spectrum antimicrobials were de-escalated prior to hematopoietic recovery did not experience adverse outcomes. These results concur with recently published studies and the Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia guidelines. An early de-escalation approach in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients specifically appears safe and may result in a reduction in antimicrobial utilization.

The Impact of Colonization with Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens (MRP) in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation - Clearance of the MRP Is Pivotal for Survival

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3421-3421
Author(s):  
Daniela Heidenreich ◽  
Sebastian Kreil ◽  
Klaus-Peter Becker ◽  
Thomas Miethke ◽  
Wolf-Karsten Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Bacterial Pathogens ◽  
Enterobacter Cloacae ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumonia

Abstract Multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens (MRP) such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) are an emerging challenge in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, no comprehensive data are available on the prevalence of MRP, their impact on the outcome after HCT and on the probability to clear a MRP. It was the purpose of this study to systematically analyze the issue of MRP in HCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 07/2010 to 12/2015 a total number of 121 (43 F; 78 M) consecutive patients who received the first allogeneic HCT at our institution were analyzed retrospectively. As baseline investigation before conditioning all patients underwent a comprehensive screening for MRP. Swabs from nose, throat, axilla, urethra and anus as well as samples from stool and urine were collected. During the course of transplantation surveillance cultures were performed weekly. In addition, routine microbiological investigations were done from blood, urine, swabs, stool or central venous catheters whenever clinically needed. In MRP colonized patients surveillance stool specimen were taken until the MRP was repeatedly non-detectable. Multidrug-resistant gram neg. bacteria were categorized as 4MRGN (resistant to cephalosporins, piperacillin, fluorochinolones and carbapenems) or as 3MRGN (resistant to 3 of these 4 antimicrobial drug groups). The primary endpoint of this analysis was day 100 non relapse mortality (NRM). Secondary endpoints were NRM and overall survival (OS) after 2 years. A further endpoint in MRP+ patients was the time to non-detectability of the MRP. RESULTS: The patient characteristics were as follows: Underlying diseases were AML (62), ALL (7), CML (8), MPN (5), lymphoma (9), MDS (25), and multiple myeloma (5). The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 50, reduced intensity in 71 patients. Patients were transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (105) or bone marrow (16) from matched siblings (28), matched unrelated (67), mismatched (15) or haploidentical donors (11). 33 patients (27%) were colonized by at least one MRP (MRP+ group) either at baseline (baseline MRP+ group, n=18, 15%) or at any other time point until day 100 post HCT. The 33 MRP+ group patients were colonized by 42 MRP (baseline MRP+ group: 19 MRP). Detected MRP were 3MRGN E. coli or Klebsiella pneumonia (17), 4MRGN (9) or 3MRGN (2) P. aeruginosa, multi-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (2), 3MRGN Citrobacter freundii (1), 3MRGN Acinetobacter baumanii (1), 4MRGN Enterobacter cloacae (2), VRE (7) and MRSA (1). Out of these 33 patients 12 (36%) developed an infection with an MRP after HCT: septicemia (n=9), pneumonia caused either by 3MRGN Klebsiella (n=1) or by 4MRGN P. aeruginosa (n=1) and urinary tract infection by 4MRGN Enterobacter cloacae (n=1). 5 patients died MRP related due to septicemia (4MRGN P. aeruginosa n=4, VRE n=1). However, day 100 and 2-year NRM of MRP colonized vs non-colonized patients were essentially the same: 15 and 21% vs 15 and 24%, respectively. Even for the baseline MRP+ group there was no significant difference of NRM: 17 and 29% vs 15 and 22%. Overall survival was also not impaired in the MRP+ group 2 years post HCT (median follow up 32.4 months, range 7.5 to 71.4 months): MRP colonized versus non-colonized patients: 60 vs 55% (baseline MRP+ group 54 vs 58%). Out of the 33 MRP+ group patients 21 patients were able to clear the MRP. On day 100 after HCT 36% of patients had been able to clear the MRP. Median time to non-detectability of the MRP was 6.3 months. In 12 patients the MRP did not disappear until the end of the observation period or death (median follow up 15 months). There was a highly significant (p<0.0001) survival difference between patients who cleared the MRP vs those with MRP persistence. Whereas 17 out of 21 (81%) patients who cleared the MRP survived, only 2 out of 12 patients with MRP persistence stayed alive (median survival 6.6 months). Day 100 NRM was 4 vs 42% (p=0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Since colonization by MRP had no neg. impact on the outcome in our cohort HCT of MRP colonized patients is feasible. However, the outcome of patients who do not clear their MRP is dismal. In order to increase the probability to clear the MRP we suggest to review the use of antibiotics in MRP colonized patients critically. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document