A split strategy to prevent cytomegalovirus after kidney transplantation using prophylaxis in serological high‐risk patients and a pre‐emptive strategy in intermediate‐risk patients: Combining the best of two options?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Hellemans ◽  
Veerle Wijtvliet ◽  
Kristof Bergs ◽  
Ester Philipse ◽  
Rowena Vleut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals Effects of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance on Localised Prostate Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3274
Author(s):  
Vinson Wai-Shun Chan ◽  
Wei Shen Tan ◽  
Aqua Asif ◽  
Alexander Ng ◽  
Olayinka Gbolahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Active Monitoring ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Randomised Controlled

External factors, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can lead to cancellations and backlogs of cancer surgeries. The effects of these delays are unclear. This study summarised the evidence surrounding expectant management, delay radical prostatectomy (RP), and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) compared to immediate RP. MEDLINE and EMBASE was searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled studies pertaining to the review question. Risks of biases (RoB) were evaluated using the RoB 2.0 tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A total of 57 studies were included. Meta-analysis of four RCTs found overall survival and cancer-specific survival were significantly worsened amongst intermediate-risk patients undergoing active monitoring, observation, or watchful waiting but not in low- and high-risk patients. Evidence from 33 observational studies comparing delayed RP and immediate RP is contradictory. However, conservative estimates of delays over 5 months, 4 months, and 30 days for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively, have been associated with significantly worse pathological and oncological outcomes in individual studies. In 11 RCTs, a 3-month course of NHT has been shown to improve pathological outcomes in most patients, but its effect on oncological outcomes is apparently limited.

scholarly journals MIPSS70+ v2.0 predicts long-term survival in myelofibrosis after allogeneic HCT with the Flu/Mel conditioning regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haris Ali ◽  
Ibrahim Aldoss ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
Sally Mokhtari ◽  
Samer Khaled ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Transplantation Outcomes ◽  
Very High

Abstract Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF), data are limited on how molecular markers predict transplantation outcomes. We retrospectively evaluated transplantation outcomes of 110 consecutive MF patients who underwent allo-HCT with a fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel) conditioning regimen at our center and assessed the impact of molecular markers on outcomes based on a 72-gene next-generation sequencing panel and Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System 70+ v2.0 (MIPSS70+ v2.0). With a median follow-up of 63.7 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 65% and the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 17%. In mutational analysis, JAK2 V617F and ASXL1 mutations were the most common. By univariable analysis, higher Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores, unrelated donor type, and very-high-risk cytogenetics were significantly associated with lower OS. Only CBL mutations were significantly associated with lower OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.64; P = .032) and increased NRM (HR, 3.68; P = .004) after allo-HCT, but CALR, ASXL1, and IDH mutations did not have an impact on transplantation outcomes. Patient classification per MIPSS70 showed worse OS for high-risk (HR, 0.49; P = .039) compared with intermediate-risk patients. Classification per MIPSS70+ v2.0 demonstrated better OS when intermediate-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients (HR, 0.291) and much lower OS when very-high-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients (HR, 5.05; P ≤ .001). In summary, we present one of the largest single-center experiences of Flu/Mel-based allo-HCT, demonstrating that revised cytogenetic changes and MIPSS70+ v2.0 score predict transplantation outcomes, and thus can better inform physicians and patients in making decisions about allo-HCT.

P3609Temporal trends of the management and outcomes of patients after myocardial infarction according to the risk for recurrent cardiovascular events

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Grinberg ◽  
T Bental ◽  
Y Hammer ◽  
A R Assali ◽  
H Vaknin-Assa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background Following Myocardial Infarction (MI), patients are at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events, particularly during the immediate period. Yet some patients are at higher risk than others, owing to their clinical characteristics and comorbidities, these high-risk patients are less often treated with guideline-recommended therapies. Aim To examine temporal trends in treatment and outcomes of patients with MI according to the TIMI risk score for secondary prevention (TRS2°P), a recently validated risk stratification tool. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients with an acute MI, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were discharged alive between 2004–2016. Temporal trends were examined in the early (2004–2010) and late (2011–2016) time-periods. Patients were stratified by the TRS2°P to a low (≤1), intermediate (2) or high-risk group (≥3). Clinical outcomes included 30-day MACE (death, MI, target vessel revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting, unstable angina or stroke) and 1-year mortality. Results Among 4921 patients, 31% were low-risk, 27% intermediate-risk and 42% high-risk. Compared to low and intermediate-risk patients, high-risk patients were older, more commonly female, and had more comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. They presented more often with non ST elevation MI and 3-vessel disease. High-risk patients were less likely to receive drug eluting stents and potent anti-platelet drugs, among other guideline-recommended therapies. Evidently, they experienced higher 30-day MACE (8.1% vs. 3.9% and 2.1% in intermediate and low-risk, respectively, P<0.001) and 1-year mortality (10.4% vs. 3.9% and 1.1% in intermediate and low-risk, respectively, P<0.001). During time, comparing the early to the late-period, the use of potent antiplatelets and statins increased among the entire cohort (P<0.001). However, only the high-risk group demonstrated a significantly lower 30-day MACE (P=0.001). During time, there were no differences in 1-year mortality rate among all risk categories. Temporal trends in 30-day MACE by TRS2°P Conclusion Despite a better application of guideline-recommended therapies, high-risk patients after MI are still relatively undertreated. Nevertheless, they demonstrated the most notable improvement in outcomes over time.

Finding of Kinase Domain Mutations at Diagnosis IN PATIENTS with Chronic PHASE Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) MAY Identify Those at High RISK of Disease Progression.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4251-4251
Author(s):  
Angelo Michele Carella ◽  
Gabriella Cirmena ◽  
Gioacchino Catania ◽  
Gianmatteo Pica ◽  
Germana Beltrami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Kinase Domain Mutations

Abstract Abstract 4251 Kinase domain (KD) mutations are associated with resistance to Imatinib in CP-CML but their incidence and prognostic significance before any treatment are unclear. To assess if KD mutations at diagnosis may have prognostic significance, we have recently reviewed (before treatment with Imatinib) the mutation status of 45 patients,of whom low risk: 24 patients; intermediate risk: 8 patients; high risk: 13 patients, according to Sokal/Euro. We found that a) no patient with low and intermediate risk showed KD mutations at diagnosis; b) 4/13 high risk patients showed the following mutations at diagnosis: S265R, E255K, F359Y and E255V/E258V; other 5 patients developed mutations during Imatinib treatment (E255V, T315I, E255V/E258V, H396R and D248-274). All patients with low-intermediate risk are alive and well at a median of 44 months (range, 15-71 months). On the contrary, 3/4 high risk patients with KD mutations at diagnosis progressed and died of blastic evolution at 23, 33 and 69 months despite Nilotinib and Dasatinib therapy. Other 3/5 high risk patients who developed mutations under Imatinib, died of blastic evolution at 22, 23 and 43 months despite Nilotinib and Dasatinib treatment. Seven high risk patients are alive under Imatinib between 4 and 51 months. In conclusion, the KD mutations at diagnosis were frequent in high Sokal/Euro risk group supporting the concept that such mutations could be related to the basic biology of the disease. These data, if confirmed, could modify our approach to high risk patients with KD mutation at diagnosis, i.e. utilizing second/third TKI generation earlier during the disease and, in selected cases, reconsidering allografting earlier before leukemic evolution make such procedure useless. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Assessing a prognostic model for predicting VTE occurrence in cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1577-1577
Author(s):  
Deesha Sarma ◽  
So Yeon Kim ◽  
David H. Henry
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Prophylactic Measures ◽  
Risk Patients

1577 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant health risk to cancer patients and is one of the leading causes of death among this population. The most effective way to prevent VTE and reduce its prominence as a public health burden is by identifying high-risk patients and administering prophylactic measures. In 2008, Khorana et al. developed a model that classified patients by risk based on clinical factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to test this model’s efficacy, on 150 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy at an outpatient oncology clinic between January 1 and August 1, 2011. We aggregated data and assigned points based on the five factors in the Khorana model: site of cancer with 2 points for very high-risk site and 1 point for high-risk site, 1 point each for leukocyte counts more than 11 x 109/L, platelet counts greater than 350 X 109/L, hemoglobin levels less than 100 g/L and/or the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 (Khorana et al., Blood 2008). Based on this scoring system, patients with 0 points were grouped into the low-risk category, those with 1-2 points were considered intermediate-risk, and those with 3-4 points were classified as high-risk. Results: As shown in the table, VTE incidence for the low-risk group was 1.9%, intermediate-risk group was 3.9%, and high-risk group was 9.1%. Conclusions: High-risk patients were about 4.5 times more likely to develop a VTE than low risk patients. These results provide valuable insight in determining which patients might benefit from prophylaxis and in motivating the design of prospective clinical trials that assess the VTE predictive model in various ambulatory cancer settings. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Early Molecular Response with Generic Imatinib Therapy in Sokal/Hasford Intermediate- & High-Risk Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Single Institution Experience from India

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4276-4276
Author(s):  
Uttam Kumar Nath ◽  
Rituparna Chetia ◽  
Avriti Baveja
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
2Nd Generation ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the commonest adult leukemia in India. Prognostication of newly diagnosed patients of chronic phase CML (CML-CP) is done by calculating pre-treatment risk scores as per Sokal and Hasford scoring systems, and patients are categorized into low-, intermediate- & high-risk groups. According to the latest NCCN guidelines, CML-CP patients with intermediate- or high-risk Sokal or Hasford score may preferentially benefit from second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. The two second generation TKI drugs available in India are dasatinib & nilotinib. Unfortunately, majority of CML-CP patients in India cannot afford upfront second generation TKI therapy, and generic imatinib is the mainstay of treatment even for intermediate-risk & high-risk patients. Achievement of early molecular response (EMR), defined as BCR-ABL1 (international scale, IS) ≤ 10% after 3 months of first-line TKI therapy, has emerged as one of the most important predictors of favourable long-term outcomes in CML-CP. The present study describes the rate of EMR achievement with first-line generic imatinib therapy in Sokal & Hasford intermediate- & high-risk patients. Objectives: To study the early molecular response rates with generic imatinib therapy at 400 mg/day dose in CML-CP patients with intermediate-risk & high-risk Sokal or Hasford scores. Methods: Our study enrolled 73 newly diagnosed CML-CP patients with intermediate- or high-risk Sokal/Hasford scores between March 2016 and March 2018. All the patients hailed from poor socio-economic background with severe financial constraint, and none of them had any medical insurance. All the patients were treated with generic imatinib mesylate 400 mg/day which was available free of cost at the hospital. None of the patients could afford dasatinib or nilotinib, despite adequate counseling & information regarding the efficacy of 2nd generation TKIs. Treatment response was monitored and defined as per European LeukemiaNet 2013 recommendations. Hematological response was assessed at 3 months for achievement of complete hematologic response (CHR). Molecular response was assessed at 3 months of first-line treatment by quantitative real-time PCR for BCR-ABL1 (IS). Complete data of 65 patients who were compliant to imatinib treatment for at least 3 months were available for analysis. Eight patients were lost to follow up. Results: The median age of patients was 35 years (age range 17 - 72 years; 40 male). CHR was achieved in 92% patients (60 out of 65 patients). Early molecular response at 3 months (BCR-ABL1, IS) ≤ 10%) was documented in 68% (44 out of 65) patients. The range of BCR-ABL1 transcript level at 3 months was 0.01% - 10% in patients who achieved EMR. EMR was not achieved in about 60% of Sokal high-risk patients and 30% of Hasford high-risk patients. Conclusion: The real scenario of CML treatment in developing countries with resource-constrained settings is very much different from that in the developed countries. The response rates to generic Imatinib therapy in Sokal/Hasford intermediate-risk & high-risk CML-CP patients are not impressive. There is scope for significant improvement in treatment response with upfront 2nd generation TKI therapy in intermediate- & high-risk CML-CP patients, if the drugs can be made available at affordable costs in developing countries. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Comparison of Oncological Outcomes Between Radical Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy by Type of Radiotherapy in Elderly Prostate Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Xiao Guo ◽  
Hao-Ran Xia ◽  
Hui-Min Hou ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Jian-Ye Wang
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients

ObjectiveWe aimed compare the oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) with those of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), or EBRT + BT (EBBT) in elderly patients with localised prostate cancer (PCa).MethodsLocalised PCa patients aged ≥70 years who underwent RP, EBRT, BT, or EBBT between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Multivariable competing risks survival analyses were used to estimate prostate cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM). Subgroup analyses according to risk categories were also conducted.ResultsOverall, 14057, 37712, 8383, and 5244 patients aged ≥70 years and treated with RP, EBRT, BT, and EBBT, respectively, were identified. In low- to intermediate-risk patients, there was no significant difference in CSM risk between RP and the other three radiotherapy modalities (all P &gt; 0.05). The corresponding 10-year CSM rates for these patients were 1.2%, 2.3%, 2.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. In high-risk patients, EBRT was associated with a higher CSM than RP (P = 0.003), whereas there was no significant difference between RP and BT or RP and EBBT (all P &gt; 0.05). The 10-year CSM rates of high-risk patients in the RP, EBRT, BT, and EBBT groups were 7.5%, 10.2%, 8.3%, and 7.6%, respectively. Regarding OCM, the risk was generally lower in RP than in the other three radiotherapy modalities (all P &lt; 0.001).ConclusionsAmong men aged ≥70 years with localised PCa, EBRT, BT, and EBBT offer cancer-specific outcomes similar to those of RP for individuals with low- to intermediate-risk disease. In patients with high-risk disease, EBBT had outcomes equally favourable to those of RP, but RP is more beneficial than EBRT. More high-quality trials are warranted to confirm and expand the present findings.

scholarly journals Low Rates of CNS Relapse in High Risk DLBCL Patients Treated with R-CODOX-M and R-IVAC: Results from a Phase 2 UK NCRI/Bloodwise Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1855-1855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H Phillips ◽  
Amy A Kirkwood ◽  
Anthony Lawrie ◽  
Simon Rule ◽  
Russell Patmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Cns Disease ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Relapse Rates

Abstract Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents a major clinical challenge and is fatal in most patients. Recently Schmitz et al (J ClinOncol 2016), defined an effective risk model, the CNS-IPI, to identify those at highest risk of CNS relapse, based on the international prognostic index (IPI) score and presence of renal or adrenal involvement. For DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP-like regimens +/- intrathecal methotrexate, the risk of CNS relapse for low, intermediate and high-risk patients was <1%, 3-4% and 10-12%, respectively. The optimum strategy for CNS prophylaxis, however, has yet to be defined. Aim: To assess CNS relapse rates in an intermediate-high risk cohort of patients with DLBCL treated with the R-CODOX-M R-IVAC regimen, incorporating multiple CNS-penetrating agents. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and an IPI score ≥3 were enrolled in a prospective, multi-centre, phase 2 trial (McMillan et al, Hematol Oncol 2015; 31(S1), 130a) and treated with modified CODOX-M and IVAC, including high dose intravenous methotrexate, cytarabine, ifosfamide and etoposide with 8-12 intrathecal injections (Mead et al, AnnOncol 2002; 23(8):1264-74); plus 8 doses of rituximab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). CNS involvement was diagnosed according to neurological signs, radiological findings and/or demonstration of malignant lymphocytes within the cerebrospinal fluid. Involvement ofextranodal sites was prospectively documented at registration and at relapse. Presence of CNS, adrenal and renal involvement was confirmed using case report forms prior to this post hoc analysis. Results: 108 patients were treated at 32 UK sites between May 2008 and April 2013. Median age was 50 years (18-65 years). Eight patients (7.4%) had CNS involvement at baseline. Eighty-two patients (75.9%) received 4 cycles of treatment. At a median follow-up of 45 months, PFS and overall survival were 65.5% (95% CI: 55.5 - 73.8) and 73.7% (64.0 - 81.2), respectively. Progression or relapse within the CNS occurred in 5 patients (4.6%; Table 1) at a median of 5.5 months after registration (0.9-9.1 months). All patients died within 9 months of CNS relapse, 4 due to DLBCL and one treatment-related death. Excluding those with CNS involvement at baseline or incomplete information (n=4; 2 with missing baseline information (no CNS relapse) and 2 awaiting confirmation of CNS status at relapse), CNS-IPI was evaluable in 96 patients, of which 95% had an elevated LDH, 57% had a performance status of ≥2, and 8% were ≥60 years. All patients had stage III-IV disease, 76% had >1 extranodalsite and 27% had renal or adrenal involvement. Forty-one patients (43%) were intermediate risk (2-3 factors) and 55 (57%) were high risk (4-6 factors) for CNS relapse. 2-year CNS relapse rates were 0% for intermediate risk and 6.2% (2.0 - 18.1) for high risk patients (Figure 1). Of the 3 CNS relapses in high risk patients, 2 occurred concurrently with systemic relapse; there was only one episode of isolated CNS relapse. Of the 8 patients with CNS involvement at baseline, 2 (25%) developed CNS relapse, including 1 isolated CNS relapse. One further patient died of refractory DLBCL whilst 5 (62.5%) are alive and progression free with a minimum of 28 months follow-up. Conclusions: Inclusion of CNS-directed therapy intrinsic to the R-CODOX-M IVAC regimen resulted in very low rates of CNS relapse. Although patient numbers and low event rates make direct comparison difficult, results appear promising alongside historical results with R-CHOP chemotherapy. CNS relapse rates for both intermediate and high risk patients in this trial were below the 95% confidence intervals for CNS relapse reported in large training and validation cohorts by Schmitz et al (0% vs 2.2 - 4.4 and 2.3 - 5.5 for intermediate risk patients and 6.2% vs 6.3 - 14.1 and 7.9 - 16.1 for high risk). Of note, only 2 patients in the whole cohort progressed with isolated CNS disease, one of whom had CNS disease at diagnosis. Thus, where systemic disease was fully treated, treatment failure due to inadequate CNS penetration was rare. Reasonable outcomes were achieved in patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis but greater patient numbers are required to further evaluate this regimen in secondary CNS lymphoma. Table 1 PFS events and CNS relapse rates Table 1. PFS events and CNS relapse rates Figure 1 CNS relapse rates according to CNS-IPI and presence of CNS disease at baseline Figure 1. CNS relapse rates according to CNS-IPI and presence of CNS disease at baseline Disclosures Phillips: Roche: Consultancy. Patmore:Roche: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Ardeshna:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference Expenses, Research Funding. Montoto:Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding.

Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL): A Comparison between French -Belgian-Swiss and Spanish Results.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 544-544
Author(s):  
L. Ades ◽  
M. Sanz ◽  
S. Chevret ◽  
S. De Botton ◽  
G. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cumulative Dose ◽  
Joint Analysis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Strong Trend ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract ATRA combined to anthracycline based chemotherapy is the reference treatment of newly diagnosed APL and a role for maintenance treatment is supported by many studies, but some controversies remain, like the role of AraC. Methods: We performed a joint analysis of pts &lt; 65 yrs included in studies LPA99 (Spanish PETHEMA) and APL 2000 (French -Belgian-Swiss APL group) to address some of those issues. In LPA99, pts received ATRA combined to Idarubicin (IDA) for induction, followed by 3 consolidation courses, 2 with IDA and 1 with mitoxantrone (MTZ, at cumulative dose of 50 mg/m2), and maintenance with intermittent ATRA and continuous 6MP + MTX during 2 years. Pts with high (WBC &gt; 10000/mm3) and intermediate (WBC &lt; 10000/mm3, platelets &lt; 40000/mm3) Sanz score also received ATRA during consolidation courses and higher cumulative dose of IDA (100 mg/m2), vs low risk pts (no consolidation ATRA, cumulative IDA: 80 mg/m2). No AraC was administered in LPA99 trial. For APL 2000, we restricted the analysis to treatment groups that received AraC: pts with low or intermediate Sanz score received induction with ATRA and DNR (60 mg/m2/d x 3) + AraC (200 mg/m2/d x 7) followed by consolidation with a similar course and a final DNR (45 mg/m2/d x 3) + AraC (1 g/m2/12h x 8) course and the same maintenance as in LPA99. High risk patients received the same treatment, but with intrathecal CNS prophylaxis and, in pts &lt; 60 years, AraC 2g/m2/12h x 8 during the last course. Median follow up was 30 and 22 months in LPA99 (412 pts) and APL 2000 (180 pts), respectively. Comparisons were adjusted on age, gender, WBC and platelet counts. Results: In low and intermediate risk patients (308 LPA99 pts, 97 APL 2000 pts), the CR rates, 2 year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), EFS and survival were 96% and 99% (p = 0.2), 2.5% and 6.9% (p = 0.05), 93% and 91% (p = 0.6), 95% and 97% (p = 0.3) in LPA99 and APL 2000 trials, respectively. In high risk patients (104 LPA99 pts, 83 APL 2000 pts), the CR rate, 2 year CIR, EFS and survival were 84% and 95% (p = 0.02), 16.0% and 3.3% (p = 0.06), 69.2% and 88.0% (p = 0.01), 82.4% and 91.2% (p = 0.04) in LPA 99 and APL 2000, respectively. Four relapses in high risk pts involved the CNS in LPA99, vs. none in APL 2000. Three and 5 pts in LPA99 and APL 2000 respectively, died in CR, from treatment toxicity. Conclusion: This analysis suggests than in pts with WBC &lt; 10000/mm3, the current PETHEMA approach yields even fewer relapses than a classical ATRA + DNR + AraC regimen, while being less myelosuppressive. This may be due to the anthracyclines used (IDA and MTZ instead of DNR) and/or to the higher cumulative dose of anthracyclines used in LPA99 trial, and possibly also to consolidation ATRA for intermediate risk pts. On the other hand, in pts with high WBC counts, APL 2000 results yielded better EFS and survival and a strong trend for fewer relapses (including relapses involving the CNS), suggesting a beneficial role for AraC, possibly at high dose, in this subset of patients

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document