Epidemiology and risk factors for invasive fungal disease in liver transplant recipients in a tertiary transplant center

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Lum ◽  
Andie Lee ◽  
Monica Vu ◽  
Simone Strasser ◽  
Rebecca Davis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Invasive Fungal Disease ◽  
Fungal Disease ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Center ◽  
Liver Transplant Recipients

The Independent Role of Cytomegalovirus as a Risk Factor for Invasive Fungal Disease in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients

1997 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie J. George ◽  
David R. Snydman ◽  
Barbara G. Werner ◽  
John Griffith ◽  
Matthew E. Falagas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Invasive Fungal Disease ◽  
Fungal Disease ◽  
Orthotopic Liver Transplant ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Liver Transplant Recipients

Surgical Site Infections After Liver Transplantation: Prospective Surveillance and Evaluation of 250 Transplant Recipients in Canada

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1084-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Natori ◽  
Rawan Kassar ◽  
Aled Iaboni ◽  
Seyed M. Hosseini-Moghaddam ◽  
James Vu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Transplant Center ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Liver Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the incidence of surgical-site infections (SSIs) in a cohort of liver transplant recipients and to assess risk factors predisposing patients to these infections.DESIGNProspective observational cohort study.SETTINGSingle transplant center in Canada.PATIENTSPatients who underwent liver transplantation between February 2011 and August 2014.METHODSMultivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for SSIs in liver transplant patients.RESULTSWe enrolled 250 liver transplant recipients. The recipients’ median age at the time of transplantation was 56 years (range, 19–70 years), and 166 patients (66.4%) were male. Moreover, 47 SSIs were documented in 43 patients (17.2%). Organ-space, superficial, and deep SSIs were noted in 29, 7, and 3 patients, respectively. In addition, 2 patients developed superficial and organ-space SSIs, and another 2 patients were found to have deep as well as organ-space infections. In total, we identified 33 organ-space SSIs (70.2%), 9 superficial SSIs (19.1%), and 5 deep SSIs (10.6%). Factors predictive of SSIs by multivariate analysis were duct-to-duct anastomosis (odds ratio [OR], 3.88; 95% CI, 1.85–8.13; P<.001) and dialysis (OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.02–12.50; P=.046). Of the 66 organisms isolated in both deep and organ-space SSIs, 55 (83%) were resistant to cefazolin.CONCLUSIONSOrgan-space SSIs are a common complication after liver transplantation. Duct-to-duct anastomosis and dialysis were independent risk factors associated with SSIs. Appropriate perioperative prophylaxis targeting patients with duct-to-duct anastomosis and dialysis while simultaneously providing optimum coverage for the potential pathogens causing SSIs is warranted.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1084–1090

scholarly journals Risk factors predicting Cytomegalovirus infection in post liver transplant recipients

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M G Abdelrahman ◽  
H A Mahmoud ◽  
M K Mohsen ◽  
M O Ali ◽  
A M N Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Rejection ◽  
Cytomegalovirus Infection ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Donor Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Transplant Recipients

Abstract Background Liver transplantation is considered to be the only curative treatment for patients with end stage liver disease. Postoperative infection remains to be one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality throughout the past years. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection although considered to be a weak viral infection that usually passes asymptomatic in immunocompetent patients, however, it is considered one of the most common pathogens causing morbidities and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Multiple studies have been done to assess the risk factors for developing CMV infection. Objective Identification of risk factors predicting Cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients following transplantation. Methods This retrospective study was conducted on 194 patients and their donors who underwent living donor liver transplantation operation at Ain Shams centre for organ transplantation (ASCOT) at Ain Shams specialized hospital in the period between January 2010 and December 2016 with at least one year follow up period after operation for the recipient group. Results In our study, 194 patients undergoing liver transplantation at Ain shams centre for organ transplantation over seven years from January 2010 to December 2016 have been followed to assess risk factors affecting CMV infection development. Chronic rejection was found to be the most common factor associated with CMV infection followed by Cyclosporin (Neoral) as main postoperative immunosuppressant following liver transplantation. Other factors that were found to carry risk for CMV infection included younger age, advanced MELD score, positive CMV IgM status of the donors and recipients. Conclusion Differentiation of Cytomegalovirus disease from Cytomegalovirus infection isn’t always available as it requires tissue invasive techniques. Multiple risk factors have been attributed to cause Cytomegalovirus infection (viremia) . In our study, rejection (chronic rejection) was the factor that carries highest risk for Cytomegalovirus infection development followed by Cyclosporin .

scholarly journals Risk factors and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant K lebsiella pneumoniae infections in liver transplant recipients

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1511-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus R. Pereira ◽  
Brendan F. Scully ◽  
Stephanie M. Pouch ◽  
Anne-Catrin Uhlemann ◽  
Stella Goudie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Liver Transplant Recipients

Pleural Effusions Following Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662093244
Author(s):  
Justin K. Lui ◽  
Lidia Spaho ◽  
Shahrad Hakimian ◽  
Michael Devine ◽  
Rosa Bui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Liver Transplant Recipients

Introduction: This was a single-center retrospective study to evaluate incidence, prognosis, and risk factors in patients with postoperative pleural effusions, a common pulmonary complication following liver transplantation. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 374 liver transplantation cases through a database within the timeframe of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2015. Demographics, pulmonary and cardiac function testing, laboratory studies, intraoperative transfusion/infusion volumes, postoperative management, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: In the immediate postoperative period, 189 (50.5%) developed pleural effusions following liver transplantation of which 145 (76.7%) resolved within 3 months. Those who developed pleural effusions demonstrated a lower fibrinogen (149.6 ± 66.3 mg/dL vs 178.4 ± 87.3 mg/dL; P = .009), total protein (5.8 ± 1.0 mg/dL vs 6.1 ± 1.2 mg/dL; P = .04), and hemoglobin (9.8 ± 1.8 mg/dL vs 10.3 ± 1.9 mg/dL; P = .004). There was not a statistically significant difference in 1-year all-cause mortality and in-hospital mortality between liver transplant recipients with and without pleural effusions. Liver transplant recipients who developed pleural effusions had a longer hospital length of stay (16.4 ± 10.9 days vs 14.0 ± 16.5 days; P = .1), but the differences were not statistically significant. However, there was a significant difference in tracheostomy rates (11.6% vs 5.4%; P = .03) in recipients who developed pleural effusions compared to recipients who did not. Conclusions: In summary, pleural effusions are common after liver transplantation and are associated with increased morbidity. Pre- and intraoperative risk factors can offer both predictive and prognostic value for post-transplantation pleural effusions. Further prospective studies will be needed to further evaluate the relevance of these findings to limit instances of postoperative pleural effusions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document