scholarly journals Patient and Clinical Perspectives on Changes to Mammography Screening Guidelines

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria D. Coronado ◽  
Javiera Martinez Gutierrez ◽  
Esther Jhingan ◽  
Antoinette Angulo ◽  
Ricardo Jimenez
Keyword(s):  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Screening Guidelines

scholarly journals Older Women’s Perspectives Driving Mammography Screening Use and Overuse: a Narrative Review of Mixed-Methods Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-289
Author(s):  
Jessica D. Austin ◽  
Rachel C. Shelton ◽  
Erica J. Lee Argov ◽  
Parisa Tehranifar
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Older Women ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Screening Mammography ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
System Level ◽  
Quantitative Evidence ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
The Usa

Abstract Purpose of Review Examining what older women know and perceive about mammography screening is critical for understanding patterns of under- and overuse, and concordance with screening mammography guidelines in the USA. This narrative review synthesizes qualitative and quantitative evidence around older women’s perspectives toward mammography screening. Recent Findings The majority of 43 identified studies focused on promoting mammography screening in women of different ages, with only four studies focusing on the overuse of mammography in women ≥ 70 years old. Older women hold positive attitudes around screening, perceive breast cancer as serious, believe the benefits outweigh the barriers, and are worried about undergoing treatment if diagnosed. Older women have limited knowledge of screening guidelines and potential harms of screening. Summary Efforts to address inequities in mammography access and underuse need to be supplemented by epidemiologic and interventional studies using mixed-methods approaches to improve awareness of benefits and harms of mammography screening in older racially and ethnically diverse women. As uncertainty around how best to approach mammography screening in older women remains, understanding women’s perspectives along with healthcare provider and system-level factors is critical for ensuring appropriate and equitable mammography screening use in older women.

scholarly journals Linking Reminders and Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Results From a National Survey

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Siembida ◽  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
Sarah A. Nowak ◽  
Andrew M. Parker ◽  
Craig Evan Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
National Sample ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Practice Characteristics

Purpose Physician reminders have successfully increased rates of mammography. However, considering recent changes to breast cancer screening guidelines that disagree on the optimal age to start and stop mammography screening, we sought to examine the extent to which reminders have been deployed for breast cancer screening targeting younger and older patients. Methods A mailed survey was sent to a national sample of 2,000 primary care physicians between May and September 2016. Physicians were asked whether they received reminders to screen women in various age groups (40 to 44, 45 to 49, and ≥ 75 years), the organizational screening guidelines they trusted most, and whether they recommended routine breast cancer screening to average-risk women in the different age groups. Using regression models, we assessed the association between reminders and physician screening recommendations, controlling for physician and practice characteristics, and evaluated whether the association varied by the guidelines they trusted. Results A total of 871 physicians responded (adjusted response rate, 52.3%). Overall, 28.9% of physicians reported receiving reminders for patient ages 40 to 44 years, 32.5% for patient ages 45 to 49 years, and 16.5% for patient ages ≥ 75 years. Receiving reminders significantly increased the likelihood of physicians recommending mammography screening. In adjusted analyses, 84% (95% CI, 77% to 90%) of physicians who received reminders recommended screening for women ages ≥ 75 versus 65% (95% CI, 62% to 69%) of those who did not receive reminders. The associations between reminders and screening recommendations remained consistent regardless of which guidelines physicians reported trusting. Conclusion Reminders were significantly associated with increases in physician screening recommendations for mammography, underscoring the need for careful implementation in scenarios where guidelines are discordant.

Abstract B89: Understanding changes in the USPSTF mammography screening guidelines: The role of the Avon Breast Health Outreach Program in reaching underserved women.

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley M. Bluethmann ◽  
Jennifer D. Allen ◽  
Hannah L. Mills ◽  
Kelly Morrison Opdyke ◽  
Kathryn Gates-Ferris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Outreach Program ◽  
Breast Health ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Underserved Women

Mammographic Screening at Age 40 or 45? What Difference Does it Make? the Potential Impact of American Cancer Society Mammography Screening Guidelines

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 847-849
Author(s):  
Crystal E. Fancher ◽  
Anthony Scott ◽  
Ahkeel Allen ◽  
Paul Dale
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Mammographic Screening ◽  
Screening Mammography ◽  
Cancer Society ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Disease Free

This is a 10-year retrospective chart review evaluating the potential impact of the most recent American Cancer Society mammography screening guidelines which excludes female patients aged 40 to 44 years from routine annual screening mammography. Instead they recommend screening mammography starting at age 45 with the option to begin screening earlier if the patient desires. The institutional cancer registry was systematically searched to identify all women aged 40 to 44 years treated for breast cancer over a 10-year period. These women were separated into two cohorts: screening mammography detected cancer (SMDC) and nonscreening mammography detected cancer (NSMDC). Statistical analysis of the cohorts was performed for lymph node status (SLN), five-year disease-free survival, and five-year overall survival. Women with SMDC had a significantly lower incidence of SLN positive cancer than the NSMDC group, 9 of 63 (14.3%) versus 36 of 81 (44 %; P < 0.001). The five-year disease-free survival for both groups was 84 per cent for SMDC and 80 per cent for NSMDC; this was not statistically significant. The five-year overall survival was statistically significant at 94 per cent for the SMDC group and 80 per cent for the NSMDC group (P < 0.05). This review demonstrates the significance of mammographic screening for early detection and treatment of breast cancer. Mammographic screening in women aged 40 to 44 detected tumors with fewer nodal metastases, resulting in improved survival and reaffirming the need for annual mammographic screening in this age group.

scholarly journals Improving physician compliance with mammography screening by implementing a breast cancer screening guideline at a hospital in Bahrain

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e001351
Author(s):  
Rabih Mustapha Abou leila ◽  
Michael Shannon ◽  
Sarah El-Nassir El-Nigoumi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Eligible Patient ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Physician Knowledge ◽  
Physician Compliance ◽  
Screening Guideline

BackgroundFrom a health and safety perspective, it is critical to use adequate, evidence-based breast screening guidelines. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve physicians’ compliance with breast cancer screening guidelines to enhance the mammography screening rate among eligible women; this was achieved through the implementation of multifaceted changes to the hospital’s processes and the improvement of physicians’ attitudes towards the guidelines.MethodsThe project used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method to implement the changes. This was a pre-post evaluation study. The data were collected from patients’ charts. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of physician compliance with mammography screening guidelines before and after the implementation of the process changes. A literature review was conducted to determine which women should be identified as eligible for mammography screening.InterventionThe interventions targeted physician knowledge and hospital processes. Improving doctors’ expertise was achieved by implementing the US Preventive Service Task Force recommendation for mammography screening every 2 years for women aged 50–74 years. The process modifications included the establishment of a system that would be effective in identifying at-risk patients and reminding physicians at the point of care.ResultsOver the course of this study, 825 patients met the criteria for breast cancer screening. The rate of physician compliance with the breast cancer screening guideline increased from 2% to 69% after 23 weeks, and the control charts demonstrated a reliable process.ConclusionThis project examined the relationship between different interventions (identification of the eligible patient, reminder alerts and physician knowledge) and physician compliance with mammography screening guidelines. The results suggest a positive link between the study variables and physicians’ compliance with mammography screening guidelines.

Factors Influencing Adherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines in Appalachian Women Participating in a Mobile Mammography Program

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 632-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ami Vyas ◽  
Suresh Madhavan ◽  
Traci LeMasters ◽  
Elvonna Atkins ◽  
Sara Gainor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Appalachian Women ◽  
Mobile Mammography ◽  
Factors Influencing
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document