Benign Hidradenoma Masquerading as Ductal Breast Cancer-A Rare Case of False-Positive Recurrence in Cancer Follow-up

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-671
Author(s):  
Charlotte L. Ives ◽  
Peter K. Donnelly ◽  
Nick Ryley ◽  
Rebecca Green ◽  
Peter Bliss ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Halon ◽  
Piotr Donizy ◽  
Pawel Surowiak ◽  
Rafal Matkowski

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13014-13014
Author(s):  
N. Mullai ◽  
W. Baker ◽  
L. Simons

13014 Background: Growth factors are routine after systemic chemotherapy both as primary and secondary prophylaxis. Similarly PET scan is increasingly used for initial staging and follow-up of response. Timing of both is important since false positive results are noted due to high sensitivity of the test. Methods: Records of four patients with super positive PET scan with diffuse uptake in the axial skeleton were analyzed for the timing of administration of white cell growth factor before imaging and confirmation of bone finding with a follow- up bone scan to rule out mets. Results: Two patients were treated for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer, one patient with breast cancer was receiving adjuvant treatment for stage IIIA breast cancer, and the last patient was treated for metastatic pancreatic cancer. All had negative scans for bone mets before the start of treatment. PET scan was done for staging in one patient and evaluation of abnormal CT scan in another, and follow-up of response in two patients. It was inadvertently obtained 10–14 days after the filgrastim/pefilgrastim administration. Based on the unusual uptake in bony skeleton, bone scan was ordered to rule out bone mets in all four patients. Since their bone scans were negative for metastatic disease they were continued on their treatment plan as scheduled. Conclusions: PET scan has been sparingly used until 1990’s due to high cost. Currently Medicare has approved it for wider indications. PET scan in general has high sensitivity and low specificity and false positive results are more common from metabolically active infection and inflammation. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor used with cancer treatments can increase the FDG uptake in PET scan. Diffuse increased uptake in bone marrow by PET scan can be seen in reactive marrow following growth factor therapy. Usually FDG uptake is modest with SUV of less than 3, uniform and diffuse if due to growth factor stimulation in contrast to greater intensity with SUV around 6 with non uniform distribution. Awareness of this pitfalls associated with PET scan allows image interpretation accurately. PET-CT fusion may increase the diagnostic specificity. However timing of the scan in relation to growth factor administration may also help to avoid the unnecessary anxiety and further follow up testing which adds to the health care costs. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 558-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. J. Khan ◽  
A. P. O’Dea ◽  
R. Dusing ◽  
P. Sharma ◽  
S. M. Roling ◽  
...  

558 Background: Integrated FDG-PET/CT improves the diagnostic accuracy of staging of some cancers. The value of FDG-PET/CT in initial staging of breast cancer for detection of distant metastases has not been defined. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 83 consecutive women at the University of Kansas Medical Center who had a FDG-PET/CT from Jan 2005 to July 2006, at the time of initial diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Women with symptoms suspicious for metastatic disease were excluded. Radiographic reports and patient charts were reviewed. All suspicious CT scans were re-read by a single radiologist who was blinded to the PET results. All suspicious scans were confirmed either by a biopsy or follow-up scans according to the discretion of the treating physician. Results: Median age was 52. 23 (28%) cancers were stage I, 44 (53%) stage II and 16 (19%) were stage III. 15/83 (18%) women had a suspicious FDG-PET/CT. Only 2 of these 15 women were confirmed to have metastatic disease, while 13 (16 %) had a false positive (FP) scan. In 5 women where both CT and PET were suspicious, 2 were true positives (TP) whereas 3 were FP. All 3 women who had suspicious PET but a non-suspicious CT were FP. All 7 women who had a non-suspicious PET and a suspicious CT were FP. PET influenced the CT classification by the radiologist in 5 (6%) women. 71/83 (86%) women had a negative or a non-suspicious CT. 3 women had lesions classified as non-suspicious with the help of a negative PET, two had lesions classified as suspicious with the help of a positive PET and seven had suspicious lesions on CT regardless of the PET. FDG-PET/CT resulted in unnecessary follow-up scans in eleven women, and unnecessary biopsies in two. One TP had metastatic bone disease. The other TP had a solitary liver metastasis detected by FDG-PET/CT which was resected and she has no evidence of disease after two years of follow-up. Conclusions: Given the high false positive rate and overall low incidence of metastases, routine use of FDG- PET/CT in asymptomatic women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer cannot be recommended. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document