Shedding of Mycobacterium bovis in respiratory secretions of free‐ranging wild dogs ( Lycaon pictus ): Implications for intraspecies transmission

Author(s):  
Christina Meiring ◽  
Roxanne Higgitt ◽  
Wynand J. Goosen ◽  
Louis van Schalkwyk ◽  
Lin‐Mari de Klerk‐Lorist ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Flacke ◽  
Penny Spiering ◽  
Dave Cooper ◽  
Micaela Szykman Gunther ◽  
Ian Robertson ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig R. Jackson ◽  
J. Weldon McNutt ◽  
Peter J. Apps

Context Conflict between large carnivores and livestock outside the boundaries of wildlife areas frequently results in losses to both livestock and predator populations. The endangered African wild dog (Lycaon pictus Temminck, 1820) is wide ranging and unrestricted by conventional fences, thereby posing a major challenge to conservation managers. Wild dogs are territorial and communicate residence using scent marks. Simulating the presence of other wild dogs using translocated foreign scent marks may therefore represent a means to manage wild dog ranging behaviour. Aims To investigate the effectiveness of using targeted scent-mark deployments to signal a wild dog pack to return to their frequented range within the safety of a protected area. Methods We report on the ranging behaviour of a wild dog pack reintroduced into a wildlife area in Botswana with no recent history of resident wild dogs. We describe daily movements by the free-ranging introduced pack and compare these to moves following targeted deployment of scent marks when the wild dog pack had ranged close to or outside the boundaries of the protected area. Key results Targeted foreign scent-mark exposure resulted in the pack moving closer to the geometric centre of its range. The mean distance travelled the day after exposure was significantly greater than the distance travelled the previous day and the mean daily distance moved during the study period. Conclusions Targeted exposure to foreign scent marks proved to be a viable alternative to recapturing dogs that had ranged beyond the boundaries of the wildlife area. Implications This novel approach to managing free-ranging carnivores utilises biologically relevant signals and holds potential not only for the conservation of African wild dogs, but also for other territorial species.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne L. Higgitt ◽  
O. Louis van Schalkwyk ◽  
Lin-Mari deKlerk-Lorist ◽  
Peter E. Buss ◽  
Peter Caldwell ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christina Meiring ◽  
Roxanne Higgitt ◽  
Anzaan Dippenaar ◽  
Eduard Roos ◽  
Peter Buss ◽  
...  

Oryx ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lindsey ◽  
C.J. Tambling ◽  
R. Brummer ◽  
H. Davies-Mostert ◽  
M. Hayward ◽  
...  

AbstractIn South Africa there are efforts to manage reintroduced subpopulations of the Vulnerable cheetah Acinonyx jubatus in small reserves (10–1,000 km2) as a managed metapopulation. We estimated areas required to support cheetahs given varying prey densities, prey profiles and presence/absence of competing predators. A recent population and habitat viability assessment indicated that 20 subpopulations of 10 cheetahs or 10 subpopulations of 15 cheetahs are required to retain 90% of the heterozygosity of free-ranging cheetahs and to overcome stochastic events in the absence or presence of lions Panthera leo, respectively. We estimate that 203 ± SE 42 km2 (range 48–466 km2) is required to support 10 cheetahs in the absence of lions, whereas 703 ± SE 311 km2 (166–2,806 km2) is required to support 15 cheetahs given equal numbers of lions, and 2,424 ± SE 890 km2 (727–3,739 km2) given equal numbers of leopards Panthera pardus, spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta, wild dogs Lycaon pictus and lions. Existing subpopulations of cheetahs generally occur at densities higher than our mean predicted densities but usually within the range of predicted densities. The large area requirements of cheetahs have implications for the development of the managed metapopulation. Sourcing reintroduction sites of the sizes required to support recommended subpopulation sizes will be difficult. Consequently, innovative measures to increase the carrying capacity of reserves for cheetahs and/or to enlarge reserves will be required. Managers may be forced to stock cheetahs close to or beyond the carrying capacity of their reserves. Consequently, careful management of reintroduced subpopulations will be required to prevent declines in prey populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document