scholarly journals Multi‐subject stochastic blockmodels with mixed effects for adaptive analysis of individual differences in human brain network cluster structure

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-396
Author(s):  
Dragana M. Pavlović ◽  
Bryan R.L. Guillaume ◽  
Soroosh Afyouni ◽  
Thomas E. Nichols
NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 116611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana M. Pavlović ◽  
Bryan R.L. Guillaume ◽  
Emma K. Towlson ◽  
Nicole M.Y. Kuek ◽  
Soroosh Afyouni ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana M. Pavlović ◽  
Bryan R. L. Guillaume ◽  
Emma K. Towlson ◽  
Nicole M. Y. Kuek ◽  
Soroosh Afyouni ◽  
...  

AbstractThere is great interest in elucidating the cluster structure of brain networks in terms of modules, blocks or clusters of similar nodes. However, it is currently challenging to handle data on multiple subjects since most of the existing methods are applicable only on a subject-by-subject basis or for analysis of a group average network. The main limitation of per-subject models is that there is no obvious way to combine the results for group comparisons, and of group-averaged models that they do not reflect the variability between subjects. Here, we propose two novel extensions of the classical Stochastic Blockmodel (SBM) that use a mixture model to estimate blocks or clusters of connected nodes, combined with a regression model to capture the effects on cluster structure of individual differences on subject-level covariates. Multi-subject Stochastic Blockmodels (MS-SBM) can flexibly account for between-subject variability in terms of a homogenous or heterogeneous effect on connectivity of covariates such as age or diagnostic status. Using synthetic data, representing a range of block sizes and cluster structures, we investigate the accuracy of the estimated MS-SBM parameters as well as the validity of inference procedures based on Wald, likelihood ratio and Monte Carlo permutation tests. We show that multi-subject SBMs recover the true cluster structure of synthetic networks more accurately and adaptively than standard methods for modular decomposition. Permutation tests of MS-SBM parameters were more robustly valid for statistical inference and Type I error control than tests based on standard asymptotic assumptions. Applied to analysis of multi-subject resting state fMRI networks (13 healthy volunteers; 12 people with schizophrenia; N = 268 brain regions), we show that the Heterogeneous Stochastic Blockmodel estimates ‘core-on-modules’ architecture. The intra-block and inter-block connection weights vary between individual participants and can be modelled as a logistic function of subject-level covariates like age or diagnostic status. Multi-subject Stochastic Blockmodels are likely to be useful tools for statistical analysis of individual differences in human brain graphs and other networks whose prior cluster structure needs to be estimated from the data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 5326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire Vergotte ◽  
Kjerstin Torre ◽  
Venkata Chaitanya Chirumamilla ◽  
Abdul Rauf Anwar ◽  
Sergiu Groppa ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e1000314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred G. Kitzbichler ◽  
Marie L. Smith ◽  
Søren R. Christensen ◽  
Ed Bullmore

Author(s):  
Xerxes D. Arsiwalla ◽  
Riccardo Zucca ◽  
Alberto Betella ◽  
Enrique Martinez ◽  
David Dalmazzo ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Matt ◽  
Lisa Kaindl ◽  
Saskia Tenk ◽  
Anicca Egger ◽  
Teodora Kolarova ◽  
...  

Abstract Background With the high spatial resolution and the potential to reach deep brain structures, ultrasound-based brain stimulation techniques offer new opportunities to non-invasively treat neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, little is known about long-term effects of ultrasound-based brain stimulation. Applying a longitudinal design, we comprehensively investigated neuromodulation induced by ultrasound brain stimulation to provide first sham-controlled evidence of long-term effects on the human brain and behavior. Methods Twelve healthy participants received three sham and three verum sessions with transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) focused on the cortical somatosensory representation of the right hand. One week before and after the sham and verum TPS applications, comprehensive structural and functional resting state MRI investigations and behavioral tests targeting tactile spatial discrimination and sensorimotor dexterity were performed. Results Compared to sham, global efficiency significantly increased within the cortical sensorimotor network after verum TPS, indicating an upregulation of the stimulated functional brain network. Axial diffusivity in left sensorimotor areas decreased after verum TPS, demonstrating an improved axonal status in the stimulated area. Conclusions TPS increased the functional and structural coupling within the stimulated left primary somatosensory cortex and adjacent sensorimotor areas up to one week after the last stimulation. These findings suggest that TPS induces neuroplastic changes that go beyond the spatial and temporal stimulation settings encouraging further clinical applications.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL van den Brink ◽  
S Nieuwenhuis ◽  
TH Donner

ABSTRACTThe widely projecting catecholaminergic (norepinephrine and dopamine) neurotransmitter systems profoundly shape the state of neuronal networks in the forebrain. Current models posit that the effects of catecholaminergic modulation on network dynamics are homogenous across the brain. However, the brain is equipped with a variety of catecholamine receptors with distinct functional effects and heterogeneous density across brain regions. Consequently, catecholaminergic effects on brain-wide network dynamics might be more spatially specific than assumed. We tested this idea through the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements performed in humans (19 females, 5 males) at ‘rest’ under pharmacological (atomoxetine-induced) elevation of catecholamine levels. We used a linear decomposition technique to identify spatial patterns of correlated fMRI signal fluctuations that were either increased or decreased by atomoxetine. This yielded two distinct spatial patterns, each expressing reliable and specific drug effects. The spatial structure of both fluctuation patterns resembled the spatial distribution of the expression of catecholamine receptor genes: α1 norepinephrine receptors (for the fluctuation pattern: placebo > atomoxetine), ‘D2-like’ dopamine receptors (pattern: atomoxetine > placebo), and β norepinephrine receptors (for both patterns, with correlations of opposite sign). We conclude that catecholaminergic effects on the forebrain are spatially more structured than traditionally assumed and at least in part explained by the heterogeneous distribution of various catecholamine receptors. Our findings link catecholaminergic effects on large-scale brain networks to low-level characteristics of the underlying neurotransmitter systems. They also provide key constraints for the development of realistic models of neuromodulatory effects on large-scale brain network dynamics.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe catecholamines norepinephrine and dopamine are an important class of modulatory neurotransmitters. Because of the widespread and diffuse release of these neuromodulators, it has commonly been assumed that their effects on neural interactions are homogenous across the brain. Here, we present results from the human brain that challenge this view. We pharmacologically increased catecholamine levels and imaged the effects on the spontaneous covariations between brain-wide fMRI signals at ‘rest’. We identified two distinct spatial patterns of covariations: one that was amplified and another that was suppressed by catecholamines. Each pattern was associated with the heterogeneous spatial distribution of the expression of distinct catecholamine receptor genes. Our results provide novel insights into the catecholaminergic modulation of large-scale human brain dynamics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 248 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Fantuzzo ◽  
Ronald P. Hart ◽  
Jeffrey D. Zahn ◽  
Zhiping P. Pang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document