Differential parenting and children's social understanding

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Pauker ◽  
Michal Perlman ◽  
Heather Prime ◽  
Jennifer M. Jenkins
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart I. Hammond ◽  
Max B. Bibok ◽  
Dana P. Liebermann ◽  
Ulrich Mueller ◽  
Jeremy Carpendale

1993 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans J. C. Berger ◽  
Karel P. M. van Spaendonck ◽  
Martin W. I. M. Horstink ◽  
Elly L. Buytenhuijs ◽  
Patty W. J. M. Lammers ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Albert Newen

Humans are hyper-social beings, highly dependent on others and on successfully interacting with them. Which theory can adequately describe our ability to understand others? In the literature we have an intense debate among proponents of theory-theory, simulation theory, and interaction theory. I argue first that none of these accounts is adequate but that we need to go in the direction of what I call the “person model theory.” The second important question is which types of embodiment (or further aspects of 4E) are systematically relevant for social understanding according to the person model theory? I argue that there are clear cases of embodiment of social understanding, while extendedness and/or enactment seem to be only clearly implemented in early infancy. Furthermore, 4E features of being embodied, enacted, extended, or embedded can only be ascribed to an implementation, a token of a specific type which makes the 4E features intensely context-dependent.


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Moore ◽  
Valerie Corkum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document