scholarly journals Complicated grief following job loss: Risk factors for its development and maintenance

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 698-706
Author(s):  
Janske H. W. Eersel ◽  
Toon W. Taris ◽  
Paul A. Boelen
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-265
Author(s):  
Susan Carla Stone

Death by suicide has increased in the United States. Experts have identified risk factors that may identify those at risk. It is understood that depression is one of the major risk factor. The families and community are the secondary victims when a suicide attempt or completion is made, and they are at risk for complicated grief. Recently, our team was consulted for the case of a young woman with a catastrophic suicide attempt.


Death Studies ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel P. Field ◽  
Charles Filanosky

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 680-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E Piper ◽  
John S Ogrodniczuk ◽  
Rene Weideman

Objective: This study aimed to discover screening questions for initial assessments of psychiatric outpatients to identify which patients are likely experiencing complicated grief (CG). Method: We examined the responses of 235 outpatients to questionnaire items. One set came from the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief (TRIG). This set represented events cited in clinical literature as indicators or risk factors for CG. Another set came from a factor analysis of items that define CG. We determined relations between items and CG, analyzed sensitivity and specificity, and compared the 2 sets of items. Results: The factor analysis items were superior. The 2 best items correctly identified nearly 90% of patients with and without CG. Conclusion: The items can be transformed into screening questions to be used in initial interviews.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita A Nekliudov ◽  
Oleg Blyuss ◽  
Ka Yan Cheung ◽  
Loukia Petrou ◽  
Jon Genuneit ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has potentially had a negative impact on the mental health and well-being of individuals and families. Anxiety levels and risk factors within particular populations are poorly described. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate confidence, understanding, trust, concerns, and levels of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population and assess risk factors for increased anxiety. METHODS We launched a cross-sectional online survey of a large Russian population between April 6 and 15, 2020, using multiple social media platforms. A set of questions targeted confidence, understanding, trust, and concerns in respondents. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was used to measure anxiety. Multiple linear regressions were used to model predictors of COVID-19–related anxiety. RESULTS The survey was completed by 23,756 out of 53,966 (44.0% response rate) unique visitors; of which, 21,364 were residing in 62 areas of Russia. State Anxiety Scale (S-Anxiety) scores were higher than Trait Anxiety Scale scores across all regions of Russia (median S-Anxiety score 52, IQR 44-60), exceeding published norms. Time spent following news on COVID-19 was strongly associated with an increased S-Anxiety adjusted for baseline anxiety level. One to two hours spent reading COVID-19 news was associated with a 5.46 (95% CI 5.03-5.90) point difference, 2-3 hours with a 7.06 (95% CI 6.37-7.74) point difference, and more than three hours with an 8.65 (95% CI 7.82-9.47) point difference, all compared to less than 30 minutes per day. Job loss during the pandemic was another important factor associated with higher S-Anxiety scores (3.95, 95% CI 3.31-4.58). Despite survey respondents reporting high confidence in information regarding COVID-19 as well as an understanding of health care guidance, they reported low overall trust in state and local authorities, and perception of country readiness. CONCLUSIONS Among Russian respondents from multiple social media platforms, there was evidence of higher levels of state anxiety associated with recent job loss and increased news consumption, as well as lower than expected trust in government agencies. These findings can help inform the development of key public health messages to help reduce anxiety and raise perceived trust in governmental response to this current national emergency. Using a similar methodology, comparative surveys are ongoing in other national populations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  

Complicated grief is a recently recognized condition that occurs in about 7% of bereaved people. People with this condition are caught up in rumination about the circumstances of the death, worry about its consequences, or excessive avoidance of reminders of the loss. Unable to comprehend the finality and consequences of the loss, they resort to excessive avoidance of reminders of the loss as they are tossed helplessly on waves of intense emotion. People with complicated grief need help, and clinicians need to know how to recognize the symptoms and how to provide help. This paper provides a framework to help clinicans understand bereavement, grief, and mourning. Evidence-based diagnostic criteria are provided to help clinicians recognize complicated grief, and differentiate it from depression as well as anxiety disorder. We provide an overview of risk factors and basic assumptions and principles that can guide treatment.


Crisis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciska Wittouck ◽  
Sara Van Autreve ◽  
Gwendolyn Portzky ◽  
Kees van Heeringen

Background: Bereavement following suicide is associated with an increased vulnerability for depression, complicated grief, suicidal ideation, and suicide. There is, however, a paucity of studies of the effects of interventions in suicide survivors. Aims: This study therefore examined the effects of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based psychoeducational intervention on depression, complicated grief, and suicide risk factors in suicide survivors. Method: In total, 83 suicide survivors were randomized to the intervention or the control condition in a cluster randomized controlled trial. Primary outcome measures included maladaptive grief reactions, depression, suicidal ideation, and hopelessness. Secondary outcome measures included grief-related cognitions and coping styles. Results: There was no significant effect of the intervention on the outcome measures. However, the intensity of symptoms of grief, depressive symptoms, and passive coping styles decreased significantly in the intervention group but not in the control group. Conclusion: The CBT-based psychoeducational intervention has no significant effect on the development of complicated grief reactions, depression, and suicide risk factors among suicide survivors. The intervention may, however, serve as supportive counseling for suicide survivors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 438-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie M. Bruinsma ◽  
Henning W. Tiemeier ◽  
Jolande Verkroost-van Heemst ◽  
Agnes van der Heide ◽  
Judith A.C. Rietjens

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e0239383
Author(s):  
Holly E. Syddall ◽  
Stefania D’Angelo ◽  
Georgia Ntani ◽  
Martin Stevens ◽  
E. Clare Harris ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document