scholarly journals Housing Allowance and Rents: Evidence from a Stepwise Subsidy Scheme*

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Essi Eerola ◽  
Teemu Lyytikäinen
Keyword(s):  
Housing Allowance ◽  
Subsidy Scheme

Assessment of agriculture insurance linked to contract farming and government input subsidy scheme in Zambia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy McCarthy ◽  
◽  
Agrotosh Mookerjee ◽  
Ulrich Hess ◽  
Saskia Kuhn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contract Farming ◽  
Subsidy Scheme

Disparate Entwicklung der Wohnungsmärkte fordert die Politik

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Arentz
Keyword(s):  
Housing Policy ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Housing Allowance ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Trading System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Site Development ◽  
High Level

AbstractThe regional differences in the housing markets are enormous and will continue to exacerbate in the future. The main task for the housing policy is to take appropriate long term measures depending on the market structure. A central aspect of future housing policy is the site development. Potential conflicts of interest with other social objectives must be detected and resolved. Creating a trading system for development rights appears to be promising. In order to secure housing for low income households, the housing allowance (Wohngeld) must be promptly adjusted to the market conditions. The public housing sector should be seen as an instrument for the stabilization of neighborhoods. Appropriate market rents secure a housing supply at a high level.

Inappropriate Comparisons as a Basis for Policy: Two Recent Examples from the Social Experiments

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-399
Author(s):  
Gary Burtless ◽  
David Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Housing Allowance ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Adjustment ◽  
Social Experiments ◽  
Program Effects ◽  
Comparison Groups ◽  
Effort Reduction ◽  
Negative Income Tax

ABSTRACTThis paper examines the problem of inappropriate comparisons in evaluating social programs and the erroneous policy conclusions which can be derived from such comparisons. The paper examines two cases from the United States of America which fail to meet the criterion that comparison groups (if necessary after statistical adjustment) should be identical in all essential respects except in their exposure to the program. In the first of the two cases, involving the measurement of work-effort reduction in negative income tax (NIT) experiments, the inappropriate comparison was made in conducting a statistical analysis of program effects. In the second case, involving the analysis of changes in housing consumption in a housing allowance experiment, the statistical analysis of program effects appears valid, but the correctly measured program outcomes were themselves inappropriately used by policy-makers in drawing policy inferences. The conclusion draws out major lessons for policy analysis and policy-making.

Subsidizing purchases of public interest products: A duopoly analysis under a subsidy scheme

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 543-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlin Luo ◽  
Mingming Leng ◽  
Xin Tian ◽  
Shouyang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Subsidy Scheme

scholarly journals Determinants of allotment and the amount of housing allowance

Kontakt ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-313
Author(s):  
Renata Petrášková ◽  
Hana Francová
Keyword(s):  
Housing Allowance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document