A Value Measure for Public-Sector Enterprise Risk Management: A TSA Case Study

Risk Analysis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth C. Fletcher ◽  
Ali E. Abbas
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Bruhn ◽  
Bronwen Whiting ◽  
Bridget Browne ◽  
Timothy Higgins ◽  
Chong It Tan

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Hafizah Zainol Abidin ◽  
Siti Zaleha Abdul Rasid ◽  
Haliyana Khalid ◽  
Rohaida Basiruddin ◽  
Shathees Baskaran

Enterprise risk management (ERM) is used to manage, integrate and aggregate all types of risks encountered by the concerned organisation. Despite having established framework and guidelines, the implementation of ERM at divisional level seemed to be lacking. There are gaps in the actual risk management practices that need to be studied and narrowed to ensure a more effective implementation of risk management. Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify characteristics of effective risk management practices and to gauge the effectiveness level at a telecommunication company. The gaps between the actual practices and the expected practices based on twenty-four (24) identified characteristics are identified and compared upon before recommendations are made to close the gaps and further enhance the risk management practices. For the purpose of this research the self-administered, web-based questionnaires were distributed to a total number of 130 engineers who were actively involved with network infrastructure planning, development and maintenance. The feedbacks received indicated that the respondents agreed with the identified characteristics of effective risk management practices and generally agreed that the effectiveness level of current risk management practices in the company is moderate or average. Furthermore, the gap analysis based on the variances indicates that there are rooms for further improvement. The study is important for more effective risk management practices in telecommunication companies. 


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Gagan Kukreja ◽  
Sanjay Gupta

This case study explores what went wrong in Tesco that resulted in the fraud of accounting misstatements of the magnitude of £263 million, why the fraud remained undetected over a number of years, which resulted in catastrophic consequences for both Tesco and its stakeholders. Furthermore, it highlights the lessons learnt from this debacle in Tesco, with focus on enterprise risk management, change management, corporate governance, materiality of transactions from accounting perspective, auditors' independence, sound accounting practices, internal controls and, employees' incentives policies. Finally, while the ultimate price of these scandals is paid by the society at large - particularly stockholders who put their hard earned savings in these institutions just on the basis of their trust on them - and while such scandals are often attributed to gaps in internal controls and auditors' negligence, this study concludes that, whatever controls are put in place or whatever accounting and reporting standards are set, if the people who are the part of system themselves decide to bypass the control systems, it is next to impossible to prevent such fraudulent activities. This case study has been prepared for educational purposes based on public available sources such as newspapers, magazines, websites and other referred articles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-162
Author(s):  
Leni Siti Rukmana Deffi ◽  
Dwi Cahyono ◽  
Rendy Mirwan Aspirand

This study aims to determine the effect of Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure, Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Debt To Asset Ratio on firm value. This research uses quantitative methods, involving a sample of 21 mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2015-2017 period. Primary data is collected from regular company reports. The results of the study using a partial test showed a significance value of 0.397 for the Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure variable, a significance value of 0.349 for the Intellectual Capital Disclosure variable and a significance value of 0.301 for the Debt To Asset Ratio variable. The calculated coefficient of determination results obtained a value of 0.111, which means the independent variable under study only affects the value of the company by 11%, while the remaining 89% of the company's value is influenced by other independent variables outside the variables used in this study. Conclusions, Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure, Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Debt to Asset Ratio have no influence on firm value. Keywords: Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure, Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Debt To Asset Ratio, firm value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document