scholarly journals Serum markers of pulmonary epithelial damage in systemic sclerosis‐associated interstitial lung disease and disease progression

Respirology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmel J.W. Stock ◽  
Rachel K. Hoyles ◽  
Cecile Daccord ◽  
Maria Kokosi ◽  
Dina Visca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Epithelial Damage

scholarly journals Predictors of progression in systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1902026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Distler ◽  
Shervin Assassi ◽  
Vincent Cottin ◽  
Maurizio Cutolo ◽  
Sonye K. Danoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Systemic Autoimmune Disease ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Organ Systems

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic autoimmune disease affecting multiple organ systems, including the lungs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of death in SSc.There are no valid biomarkers to predict the occurrence of SSc-ILD, although auto-antibodies against anti-topoisomerase I and several inflammatory markers are candidate biomarkers that need further evaluation. Chest auscultation, presence of shortness of breath and pulmonary function testing are important diagnostic tools, but lack sensitivity to detect early ILD. Baseline screening with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is therefore necessary to confirm an SSc-ILD diagnosis. Once diagnosed with SSc-ILD, patients' clinical courses are variable and difficult to predict, although certain patient characteristics and biomarkers are associated with disease progression. It is important to monitor patients with SSc-ILD for signs of disease progression, although there is no consensus about which diagnostic tools to use or how often monitoring should occur. In this article, we review methods used to define and predict disease progression in SSc-ILD.There is no valid definition of SSc-ILD disease progression, but we suggest that either a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline of ≥10%, or a decline in FVC of 5–9% in association with a decline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide of ≥15% represents progression. An increase in the radiographic extent of ILD on HRCT imaging would also signify progression. A time period of 1–2 years is generally used for this definition, but a decline over a longer time period may also reflect clinically relevant disease progression.

Bronchoalveolar lavage cellular profiles in patients with systemic sclerosis–associated interstitial lung disease are not predictive of disease progression

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 2005-2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole S. L. Goh ◽  
Srihari Veeraraghavan ◽  
Sujal R. Desai ◽  
Derek Cramer ◽  
David M. Hansell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Bronchoalveolar Lavage ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Disease Progression

scholarly journals Natural history of systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease: How to identify a progressive fibrosing phenotype

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
History Of ◽  
Rate Of Decline ◽  
Patients Experience

The natural history of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis is highly variable. Historical observational studies have demonstrated that the greatest decline in lung function in systemic sclerosis occurs early in the course of the disease; however, not all patients experience a decline in lung function even in the absence of treatment. Furthermore, among patients who do experience a decline in lung function, the rate of decline can be either rapid or slow. The most common clinical phenotypes of systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease are, therefore, as follows: (1) rapid progressors, (2) gradual progressors, (3) stabilizers, and (4) improvers. This review summarizes the features of systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease patients who are more likely to experience rapid progression of interstitial lung disease, as well as those who are more likely not to experience interstitial lung disease progression. Understanding the clinical, biological, and radiographic factors that consistently predict interstitial lung disease–related outcomes in systemic sclerosis is central to our ability to recognize those patients who are at heightened risk for interstitial lung disease progression. With new options available for treating patients with systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease, it is more important than ever to accurately identify patients who may derive the most benefit from aggressive systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease therapy. Early therapeutic intervention in patients with this progressive fibrosing phenotype may ultimately improve morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients with systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease.

Does Systemic Sclerosis–associated Interstitial Lung Disease Burn Out? Specific Phenotypes of Disease Progression

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1427-1433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabina A. Guler ◽  
Tiffany A. Winstone ◽  
Darra Murphy ◽  
Cameron Hague ◽  
Jeanette Soon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Burn Out

scholarly journals OP0272 68GA-FAPI-04 PET/CT STUDY EXTENSION FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF FIBROBLAST ACTIVATION AND RISK EVALUATION IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS-RELATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 165.1-166
Author(s):  
C. Bergmann ◽  
J. H. W. Distler ◽  
C. Treutlein ◽  
K. Tascilar ◽  
A. T. Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Forced Vital Capacity ◽  
Vital Capacity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Fibroblast Activation ◽  
Pet Ct

Background:Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common cause of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc). To date, the progression of SSc-ILD is judged by the accrual of lung damage on computed tomography (CT) and functional decline (forced vital capacity). However, this approach does not directly assess the activity of tissue remodeling. Moreover, prediction of the course of ILD in individual SSc patients remains challenging. Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) is a specific, ex vivo validated marker for activated fibroblasts.Objectives:The aims of this study were: 1. To assess differences in the uptake of 68GA-FAPI 04 in SSc-ILD patients compared to controls, to analyze 2. whether 68GA-FAPI 04 uptake at baseline correlates with other risk factors of disease progression and 3. Whether 68GA-FAPI 04 uptake is associated with the course of SSc-ILD.Methods:Between September 2018 and April 2020, 21 patients with SSc-ILD confirmed by HRCT and onset of SSc-ILD within ≤ 5 years or signs of progressive ILD and 21 controls without ILD were consecutively enrolled. All participants underwent 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging and standard-of-care procedures including HRCT and lung function testing (PFT) at baseline. Patients with SSc-ILD patients were followed-up for 6 months with HRCT and PFT. Follow-up 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans were obtained in a subset of patients treated with nintedanib. We compared baseline 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT uptake to standard diagnostic tools and currently used predictors of ILD progression. The association of 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake with changes in FVC was analyzed using mixed-effects models.Results:68Ga-FAPI-04 accumulated in fibrotic areas of the lungs in SSc-ILD compared to controls with a median (q1-q3 interval) wlSUVmean of 0.8 (0.6 to 2.1) in the SSc-ILD group and 0.5 (0.4 to 0.5) in the control group (p<0.0001 with Mann-Whitney test) and a median whole lung maximal standardized uptake value (wlSUVmax) of 4.4 (3.05 to 5.2) in the SSc-ILD group compared to 0.7 (0.65 to 0.7) in the control group (p<0.0001). wlFAPI-MAV and wlTL-FAPI were not measurable in control subjects, as no 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake above background level was observed. In the SSc-ILD group the median wlFAPI-MAV was 254cm3 (163.4 to 442.3) and the median wlTL-FAPI was 183.6 cm3 (98.04 to 960.7). 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake was higher in patients with extensive disease, with previous ILD progression or high EUSTAR activity scores. Increased 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake at baseline was associated with progression of ILD independently of extent of involvement on HRCT scan and the forced vital capacity at baseline. In consecutive 68Ga-FAPI-04-PET/CTs, changes in 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake was concordant with the observed response to the fibroblast-targeting antifibrotic agent nintedanib.Conclusion:Our study presents first in human evidence that 68Ga-FAPI-04-fibroblast uptake correlates with fibrotic activity and disease progression in the lungs of SSc-ILD patients and that 68Ga-FAPI-04-PET/CT may be of potential to improve risk assessment of SSc-ILD.Figure 1.A and B:68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT scan from a patient with SSc-ILD with selective 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake in fibrotic areas of the left- and right lower lung lobes (red arrows), but not in non-fibrotic areas such as the middle lobe (green arrow). B Corresponding CT component.Acknowledgements:We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Uwe Haberkorn (University Hospital Heidelberg and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany) and iTheranostics Inc. (Dulles, VA, USA) for providing the precursor FAPI-04.Disclosure of Interests:Christina Bergmann: None declared, Jörg H.W. Distler Speakers bureau: Actelion, Anamar, ARXX, Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, GSK, Inventiva, JB Therapeutics, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Anamar, Active Biotech, Array Biopharma, ARXX, aTyr, BMS, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, GSK, Inventiva, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, RedX, UCB, Christoph Treutlein: None declared, Koray Tascilar Speakers bureau: Gilead sciences GmbH, Pfizer Turkey, UCB Turkey, Anna-Theresa Mueller: None declared, Armin Atzinger: None declared, Alexandru-Emil Matei: None declared, Johannes Knitza: None declared, Andrea-Hermina Györfi: None declared, Anja Lueck: None declared, Clara Dees: None declared, Alina Soare: None declared, Andreas Ramming: None declared, Verena Schönau: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics,Bayer, Böhringer Ingelheim, Catenion,Competitive Drug Development International Ltd, Corbuspharma, CSL Behring, ChemomAb, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galaapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals,GSK, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, IQvia, Kymera, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Taget Bio Sciencec, UCB, Grant/research support from: Bayer,Böhringer Ingelheim, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Olaf Prante: None declared, Philipp Ritt: None declared, Theresa Ida Goetz: None declared, Markus Koehner: None declared, Michael Cordes: None declared, Tobias Baeuerle: None declared, Torsten Kuwert Speakers bureau: Honoraria for occasional lectures by Siemens Healthineers, Grant/research support from: Research grant to the Clinic of Nuclear Medicine by this entity covering projects in the field of SPECT/CT, Georg Schett: None declared, Christian Schmidkonz: None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document