scholarly journals DIFFERENCE OF THE CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOME BETWEEN CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES ASSOCIATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE AND IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS

Respirology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 154-154
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Connective Tissue Diseases

scholarly journals Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index—Biomarkers in Interstitial Lung Disease

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 381
Author(s):  
Victoria Maria Ruta ◽  
Adina Milena Man ◽  
Teodora Gabriela Alexescu ◽  
Nicoleta Stefania Motoc ◽  
Simina Tarmure ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Connective Tissue Diseases ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Significant Statistical Difference

Background and objectives: The aims of the study were to evaluate the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) as inflammation markers and prognostic factors in patients with known interstitial lung disease secondary to connective tissue diseases (CTD-ILD) compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients with known interstitial lung disease (21 with IPF and 21 with CTD-ILD) and 42 control matched healthy patients were included. The NLR was calculated as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count, and the SII was calculated as follows: SII = platelets × neutrophils/lymphocytes, with the data being obtained from the patients data charts at admission, before any treatment. Results: our hypothesis was that in patients with interstitial lung disease NLR and SII would have higher values compared with patients with CTD-ILD or control healthy patients. The mean NLR value was 3.01 (±1.35) among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and 2.38 (±1.08) among patients with CTD-ILD without significant statistical difference (p = 0.92). There was however a clinically significant statistical difference when compared with the control group, where NLR was 2.00 (±1.05) (p = 0.003). SII values were 619.37 (±329.51) in patients with IPF, 671.55 (±365.73) in CTD-ILD group and 569.73 (±326.67) in healthy subjects (p = 0.13) Conclusions: A mean NLR value of 2.8 and a SII value over 500 in patients with connective diseases can become a marker of pulmonary interstitial involvement. In the context of non-exacerbated interstitial lung disease, NLR and SII have reduced numerical values, without being statistically correlated with prognosis when we compared with patients with connective tissue diseases without exacerbation or with healthy people, the cut off being of 2.4. However subsequent studies in larger patient samples might provide changes in these cut-off values.

scholarly journals Comparison of Characteristics of Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Diseases, Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Diseases, and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Chinese Han Population: A Retrospective Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Pan ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Rongfei Sun ◽  
Mingyu Fan ◽  
Guixiu Shi
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Connective Tissue Disease ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Western China ◽  
Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease

Our study compared the prevalence and characteristics of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), undifferentiated connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (UCTD-ILD), or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) between January 2009 and December 2012 in West China Hospital, western China. Patients who met the criteria for ILD were included and were assigned to CTD-ILD, UCTD-ILD, or IPF group when they met the criteria for CTD, UCTD, or IPF, respectively. Clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and high-resolution CT images were analyzed and compared among three groups. 203 patients were included, and all were Han nationality. CTD-ILD was identified in 31%, UCTD-ILD in 32%, and IPF in 37%. Gender and age differed among groups. Pulmonary symptoms were more common in IPF, while extrapulmonary symptoms were more common in CTD-ILD and UCTD-ILD group. Patients with CTD-ILD had more abnormal antibody tests than those of UCTD-ILD and IPF. Little significance was seen in HRCT images among three groups. A systematic evaluation of symptoms and serologic tests in patients with ILD can identify CTD-ILD, UCTD-ILD, and IPF.

Comparative analysis of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis from a tertiary care centre in Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 2330-2334
Author(s):  
Ali Bin Sarwar Zubairi ◽  
Huzaifa Ahmad ◽  
Maryam Hassan ◽  
Faraz Siddiqui ◽  
Nousheen Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Connective Tissue Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonitis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Data Registry

Objectives: The burden of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is rising globally. This study aimed to describe and compare characteristics of Connective Tissue Disease-associated ILD with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, the two most commonly observed ILDs among outpatients at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods: A retrospective research study was conducted. Patients with ILD were identified through the outpatient data registry at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi from October 2016 to October 2017. We obtained data pertaining to demographics, clinical and radiologic features. A comparative analysis was done to compare the patient characteristics and key features between CTD-ILD and IPF patients. The analysis was done using STATA version 12.0. Results: We identified 184 patients with ILD, which included 52 (29.3%) with CTD-ILD and 62 (35%) with IPF. The most prevalent conditions among CTD-ILD patients included rheumatoid arthritis (42.3%) and scleroderma (25%). Usual interstitial pneumonitis was the common radiologic pattern in RA-ILD (63.6%) and scleroderma (61.5%) while non-specific interstitial pneumonitis was more common in MCTD (85.7%) and SLE (80%). Compared to patients with IPF, those with CTD-ILD were predominantly younger (p<0.001) and female (88.5 % v 45.2%, p<0.001). History of GERD was also significantly lower in CTD-ILD (p=0.05). Conclusion: CTD-ILD patients in our registry were younger and predominantly female compared to IPF. Further studies and ongoing data registry are needed to understand the full spectrum of this disease and long term clinical outcomes. Keywords: Connective tissue disease, Interstitial lung disease, Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Continuous...

scholarly journals Serum Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3167
Author(s):  
Eva Cabrera Cesar ◽  
Lidia Lopez-Lopez ◽  
Estrella Lara ◽  
M. Victoria Hidalgo-San Juan ◽  
Concepcion Parrado Romero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Connective Tissue Disease ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Healthy Controls

Introduction: The goal of this study is to determine whether Advanced glycosylated end-products (AGE), Advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) and Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7) could be used as differential biomarkers for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). Method: Seventy-three patients were enrolled: 29 with IPF, 14 with CTD-ILD, and 30 healthy controls. The study included a single visit by participants. A blood sample was drawn and serum was analysed for AGE using spectrofluorimetry, AOPP by spectrophotometry, and MMP7 using sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: AGE, AOPP and MMP7 serum levels were significantly higher in both IPF and CTD-ILD patients versus healthy controls; and AGE was also significantly elevated in CTD-ILD compared to the IPF group. AGE plasma levels clearly distinguished CTD-ILD patients from healthy participants (AUC = 0.95; 95% IC 0.86–1), whereas in IPF patients, the distinction was moderate (AUC = 0.78; 95% IC 0.60–0.97). Conclusion: In summary, our results provide support for the potential value of serum AGE, AOPP and MMP7 concentrations as diagnostic biomarkers in IPF and CTD-ILD to differentiate between ILD patients and healthy controls. Furthermore, this study provides evidence, for the first time, for the possible use of AGE as a differential diagnostic biomarker to distinguish between IPF and CTD-ILD. The value of these biomarkers as additional tools in a multidisciplinary approach to IPF and CTD-ILD diagnosis needs to be considered and further explored. Multicentre studies are necessary to understand the role of AGE in differential diagnosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Ross ◽  
Athol Wells
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Heterogeneous Group

Interstitial lung diseases are a complex heterogeneous group which are challenging to diagnose and treat. The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, as opposed to connective tissue interstitial lung disease, is important, as treatments and prognoses are very different. This chapter focusses on a case where this diagnosis is challenging. The evidence for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is reviewed, in light of recent trials and new recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document