Exploring open innovation in the digital age: A maturity model and future research directions

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Enkel ◽  
Marcel Bogers ◽  
Henry Chesbrough
Keyword(s):  
Open Innovation ◽  
Digital Age ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Future Research Directions

ESRC Review: Communities and Identities

2020 ◽  
pp. 403-425
Author(s):  
Simeon J. Yates ◽  
Jordana Blejmar ◽  
Bridgette Wessels ◽  
Claire Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Online Communities ◽  
Online Community ◽  
Digital Age ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Digital Community ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Gender Education ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Relevant Range

This chapter describes the analyses and results for the ESRC Domain of Communities and Identities, guided by two main questions: How do we define and authenticate ourselves in a digital age? What new forms of communities and work emerge as a result of digital technologies? The chapter first provides an initial overview of the major insights from the literature review and analysis, the Delphi surveys, and workshop discussions about the relevant range of the concepts of community and identity in a digital age. The resulting focus is primarily on more civic or political aspects of online communities and identities. Eight main topics emerged, including online community (including group), mobile phone, children, migration and diaspora, identity (psychology/social), gender, education, and friendship network. The analyses also highlighted theory, methods, and approaches in the literature. The review provides examples of literature in the project’s time period that illustrate these topics. The chapter ends with a discussion of future research directions (e.g., digital community exclusion and inclusion) and research challenges (e.g., the need to include history and culture in studies of online communities).

"Open Innovation: Content, Impact and Future Research Directions"

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 13088
Author(s):  
Krithika Randhawa ◽  
Ralf Wilden ◽  
Jan Hohberger
Keyword(s):  
Open Innovation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Future Research Directions

ESCR Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 449-470
Author(s):  
Simeon J. Yates ◽  
Bridgette Wessels ◽  
Paul Hepburn ◽  
Alexander Frame ◽  
Vishanth Weerakkody
Keyword(s):  
Public Sphere ◽  
Hate Crime ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Digital Age ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Partisan Politics ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Use Of The Internet

This chapter describes the analyses and results for the ESRC Domain of Citizenship and Politics, guided by two main questions: How digital technology impacts on our autonomy, agency, and privacy; Whether and how our understanding of citizenship is evolving in the digital age. It first provides an initial overview of the major insights from the literature review and analysis, the Delphi surveys, and workshop discussions about the relevant range of the concepts of citizenship and politics in a digital age. Over time the literature shows a shift from issues of public sphere and use of the Internet by government and candidates to more focus on political participation and engagement, especially through online communities, social networks, and social media. Eight main topics emerged: public sphere, measurement, social network analysis, protest and activism, governance, elections, cyber hate crime, and partisan politics. The analyses also highlighted theory, methods, and approaches in the literature. The review provides examples of literature in the project’s time period that illustrate these topics. The chapter ends with a discussion of considerable future research directions (e.g., mobilization and radicalization) and research challenges (e.g., managing big data, and ethical issues).

Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: a systematic literature review

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1362-1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Natalicchio ◽  
Lorenzo Ardito ◽  
Tommaso Savino ◽  
Vito Albino
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Final Sample ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Future Research Directions

Purpose Knowledge assumes a pivotal role in the open innovation (OI) paradigm. Yet OI has been scantly investigated by adopting a knowledge management (KM) lens. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic literature review of the KM practices analysed by prior literature to support OI activities. Design/methodology/approach To perform a valuable literature review, the steps for systematic review proposed by previous studies have been adopted. These steps have yielded a final sample of 34 articles. Afterward, the authors have distinguished and analysed the identified articles according to the three main OI processes, i.e. inbound, outbound and coupled OI processes. Findings This research groups and highlights the most relevant KM practices to support OI activities on the basis of the inbound, outbound and coupled OI processes. Originality/value Despite knowledge is the most relevant resource exchanged in OI activities, this is the first attempt to highlight how knowledge should be managed in an OI context by adopting a KM lens. Furthermore, the authors also identify relevant topics that have been so far understudied, which the authors suggest as future research directions.

Organizational Characteristics and Engagement in Open Innovation: Is There a Link?

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. S1-S20 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Muzamil Naqshbandi
Keyword(s):  
Market Orientation ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Future Research ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Different Characteristics ◽  
Shed Light

This study explores whether or not firms with different characteristics engage in open innovation (OI) differently. The aim specifically is to examine how firms differ in engaging in inbound and outbound OI based on their characteristics: type of industry, age, market orientation, firm ownership, size in terms of number of employees and annual revenue. Data were collected from 133 firms operating in various high-tech industries in Malaysia. Results obtained using several one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests show that a firm’s engagement in OI is a function of the type of industry the firm is operating in, its ownership structure and its size in terms of number of employees and revenue earned. However, engagement in OI was not found to be related to firms’ age or their market orientation. These findings shed light on the characteristics of firms that engage in OI more than others, thus having vital implications for theory and practice. The article presents a discussion of these findings along with limitations and future research directions.

scholarly journals Destination Resilience and Innovation for Advanced Sustainable Tourism Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 12632
Author(s):  
Valentina Della Corte ◽  
Giovanna Del Gaudio ◽  
Fabiana Sepe ◽  
Simone Luongo
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Management ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Tourist Destination ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Tourism Management ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Resilience Assessment

Over the years, literature on the topic of destination resilience has gained increasing attention in different fields (strategic management; sociology; etc.). Therefore, the potentiality of resilience in the tourism field has stimulated the definition and the implementation of strategies, policies, and activities addressed to mitigate risks and seize opportunities through open innovation attitudes in times of crisis. This work aims to contribute to the debate on tourist destination resilience by proposing a conceptual framework of destination resilience and open innovation based on a bibliometric analysis. Moreover, this article is intended as a starting point for a wider discussion of factors that contribute to destination resilience and therefore provides the basis to develop a toolkit of matrixes and approaches. Findings reveal that resilience assessment, as well as in terms of performance, remain undiscovered. Moreover, the present research poses some unresolved questions, shaping interesting future research directions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document