scholarly journals Electroconvulsive therapy for older adult patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 468-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Dong ◽  
Xiao‐Min Zhu ◽  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Xiao‐Hong Li ◽  
Chee H. Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Statins for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0249409
Author(s):  
Riccardo De Giorgi ◽  
Franco De Crescenzo ◽  
Nicola Rizzo Pesci ◽  
Marieke Martens ◽  
Wendy Howard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Efficacy Outcome

Background The burden of depressive disorder is large and new treatment approaches are required. Repurposing widely available drugs such as statins may be a time- and cost-effective solution. Statins have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties which have been shown to be relevant to the pathophysiology of depression. This study assesses the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of statins in major depressive disorder. Methods Our study is an update and extension of a previous meta-analysis published in 2016 by Salagre et al. We performed a systematic review (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov until the 1st September 2020) and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using any statin against placebo or any other statin in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Our primary efficacy outcome measure was the mean value on any standardized scale for depressive symptoms at 8 weeks of treatment. We also calculated outcomes for efficacy, response, and remission at 2, 4, and 12 weeks, as well as acceptability (dropouts for any cause), tolerability (dropouts due to any adverse event), and safety (any adverse event) outcomes at the studies’ endpoints. Furthermore, we conducted an exploratory network meta-analysis for the primary efficacy outcome to identify potential differences between statins. Results We retrieved five randomized controlled trials meeting our inclusion criteria: four used a statin in addition to an antidepressant and compared it to placebo plus antidepressant, and one compared two statins alone. and one comparing one statin with another. Statins compared to placebo in addition to antidepressants were efficacious at 8 weeks (N = 255, SMD = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.74 to -0. 22) and 12 weeks (N = 134, SMD = -0.47, 95% CI = -0.89 to -0.05, moderate certainty) with no difference for acceptability, tolerability, and safety (low certainty). An exploratory network meta-analysis suggested that the most lipophilic statins, especially simvastatin, could be more efficacious than less lipophilic or hydrophilic molecules. Conclusions This systematic review suggests the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of statins in addition to antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder. Further clinical trials in different settings are required to test this result. Trial rgistration PROSPERO registration: CRD42020170938.

scholarly journals Fluoxetine in the Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
pp. 001857872092538
Author(s):  
Ayman Antoun Reyad ◽  
Kiran Plaha ◽  
Eriny Girgis ◽  
Raafat Mishriky
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background: Fluoxetine is a serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitor antidepressant and is the only approved pharmacological treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in children and adolescent. Methods: We searched the published randomized controlled-trials to review fluoxetine efficacy and tolerability using the databases PubMed, EudraCT, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for fluoxetine role in managing MDD in children and adolescents. A meta-analysis was conducted using the identified 7 clinical trials to assess efficacy using the outcomes: Children's Depression Rating Scale–Revised (CDRS-R), Clinical Global Impressions–Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement (CGI-I) response rate. The risk of discontinuation due to adverse effects and common side effects were examined. Results: The mean difference in change from baseline for CDRS-R was −2.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], −3.96, −1.48) favoring fluoxetine treatment ( P < .001). Similarly, mean difference for CGI-S was −0.21 (95% CI, −0.36, −0.06). The risk ratio (RR) of discontinuing due to adverse events was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.54, 1.83), with RR for headache side effects 1.34 (95% CI, 1.03, 1.74) and rash 2.6 (95% CI, 1.32, 5.14). Conclusion: Fluoxetine demonstrates significant improvements in symptom intensity control in young patients suffering from MDD and is considered well tolerated with similar rates of trials discontinuation; however, fluoxetine was associated with a higher risk of headache and rash side effects. These findings will guide psychiatrists and pharmacists in their clinical role for supporting the care of young mental health patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document