Drought stress reduces crop carbon gain due to delayed photosynthetic induction under fluctuating light conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuma Sakoda ◽  
Kazuki Taniyoshi ◽  
Wataru Yamori ◽  
Yu Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Photosynthetic Induction ◽  
Light Conditions ◽  
Fluctuating Light

scholarly journals Drought stress imposes reversible photosynthetic damage under fluctuating light conditions in crops

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuma Sakoda ◽  
Kazuki Taniyoshi ◽  
Wataru Yamori ◽  
Yu Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Photosynthetic Capacity ◽  
Crop Growth ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Photosynthetic Induction ◽  
Light Conditions ◽  
Fluctuating Light ◽  
Dynamic Photosynthesis

Drought stress is a major limiting factor for crop growth and yield. Water availability in the field can cyclically change between drought and rewatering conditions, depending on precipitation patterns. Concurrently, light intensity under field conditions can fluctuate, inducing dynamic photosynthesis and transpiration during crop growth period. The present study aimed to characterize carbon gain and water use in fluctuating light under drought and rewatering conditions by conducting gas exchange measurements in two major crops, namely rice and soybean. In both crops, drought stress reduced steady-state photosynthesis and/or photosynthetic capacity, and delayed photosynthetic induction even when it had relatively small impact on photosynthetic capacity, suggesting that the drought effects on photosynthesis should be evaluated based on induction, maximum, and steady states. This delayed photosynthetic induction resulted in a substantial loss of carbon gain under fluctuating light conditions, which can be a limiting factor for crop growth and yield in the field. Meanwhile, rewatering after drought conditions completely recovered photosynthetic capacity and induction in both crops, whereas drought experience would be memorized to slow down the stomatal opening. Therefore, the stability of photosynthetic induction can be a promising target to improve drought tolerance during crop breeding in the future.

scholarly journals Drought stress delays photosynthetic induction and accelerates photoinhibition of photosystem I under fluctuating light

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Sun ◽  
Qi Shi ◽  
Ning-Yu Liu ◽  
Shi-Bao Zhang ◽  
Wei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Gas Exchange ◽  
Photosystem I ◽  
Co2 Fixation ◽  
Electron Flow ◽  
Photosynthetic Performance ◽  
High Light ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Photosynthetic Induction ◽  
Fluctuating Light

Fluctuating light (FL) and drought stress usually occur concomitantly. However, whether drought stress affects photosynthetic performance under FL remains unknown. Here, we measured gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and P700 redox state under FL in drought-stressed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings. Drought stress significantly affected stomatal opening and mesophyll conductance after transition from low to high light and thus delayed photosynthetic induction under FL. Therefore, drought stress exacerbated the loss of carbon gain under FL. Furthermore, restriction of CO2 fixation under drought stress aggravated the over-reduction of photosystem I (PSI) upon transition from low to high light. The resulting stronger FL-induced PSI photoinhibition significantly supressed linear electron flow and PSI photoprotection. These results indicated that drought stress not only affected gas exchange under FL but also accelerated FL-induced photoinhibition of PSI. Furthermore, drought stress enhanced relative cyclic electron flow in FL, which partially compensated for restricted CO2 fixation and thus favored PSI photoprotection under FL. Therefore, drought stress has large effects on photosynthetic dark and light reactions under FL.

scholarly journals Drought stress delays photosynthetic induction and accelerates photoinhibition of photosystem I under fluctuating light

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Sun ◽  
Qi Shi ◽  
Ning-Yu Liu ◽  
Shi-Bao Zhang ◽  
Wei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Gas Exchange ◽  
Photosystem I ◽  
Co2 Fixation ◽  
Electron Flow ◽  
Photosynthetic Performance ◽  
High Light ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Photosynthetic Induction ◽  
Fluctuating Light

Fluctuating light (FL) and drought stress usually occur concomitantly. However, whether drought stress affects photosynthetic performance under FL remains unknown. Here, we measured gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and P700 redox state under FL in drought-stressed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings. Drought stress significantly affected stomatal opening and mesophyll conductance after transition from low to high light and thus delayed photosynthetic induction under FL. Therefore, drought stress exacerbated the loss of carbon gain under FL. Furthermore, restriction of CO2 fixation under drought stress aggravated the over-reduction of photosystem I (PSI) upon transition from low to high light. The resulting stronger FL-induced PSI photoinhibition significantly supressed linear electron flow and PSI photoprotection. These results indicated that drought stress not only affected gas exchange under FL but also accelerated FL-induced photoinhibition of PSI. Furthermore, drought stress enhanced relative cyclic electron flow in FL, which partially compensated for restricted CO2 fixation and thus favored PSI photoprotection under FL. Therefore, drought stress has large effects on photosynthetic dark and light reactions under FL.

scholarly journals High-yielding rice Takanari has superior photosynthetic response to a commercial rice Koshihikari under fluctuating light

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (19) ◽  
pp. 5287-5297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Adachi ◽  
Yu Tanaka ◽  
Atsuko Miyagi ◽  
Makoto Kashima ◽  
Ayumi Tezuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Transport ◽  
Stomatal Conductance ◽  
Metabolic Flux ◽  
Electron Transport Rate ◽  
Rice Cultivar ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
High Electron ◽  
Photosynthetic Induction ◽  
Photosynthetic Response ◽  
Fluctuating Light

The high-yielding rice cultivar Takanari has fast photosynthetic induction owing to a high electron transport rate, stomatal conductance, and metabolic flux, leading to high daily carbon gain under fluctuating light.

scholarly journals Photosynthetic induction upon transfer from low to high light is affected by leaf nitrogen content in tomato

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Sun ◽  
Yu-Qi Zhang ◽  
Shi-Bao Zhang ◽  
Wei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Electron Flow ◽  
Co2 Assimilation ◽  
High Light ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Leaf Nitrogen Content ◽  
Photosynthetic Induction ◽  
N Content ◽  
Fluctuating Light ◽  
Leaf N Content ◽  
Leaf N

The response of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation to changes of illumination affects plant growth and crop productivity under natural fluctuating light conditions. However, the effects of nitrogen (N) supply on photosynthetic physiology after transition from low to high light are seldom studied. To elucidate this, we measured gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence under fluctuating light in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings grown with different N conditions. After transition from low to high light, the induction speeds of net CO2 assimilation (AN), stomatal conductance (gs) and mesophyll conductance (gm) delayed with the decline in leaf N content. The times to reach 90% of maximum AN, gs and gm were negatively correlated to leaf N content. This delayed photosynthetic induction in plants grown under low N concentration was mainly caused by the slow induction response of gm rather than that of gs. Furthermore, the photosynthetic induction upon transfer from low to high light was hardly limited by photosynthetic electron flow. These results indicate that decreased leaf N content declines carbon gain under fluctuating light in tomato. Increasing the induction kinetics of gm has the potential to enhance the carbon gain of field crops grown in infertile soil.

scholarly journals A chloroplast thylakoid lumen protein is required for proper photosynthetic acclimation of plants under fluctuating light environments

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (38) ◽  
pp. E8110-E8117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Liu ◽  
Robert L. Last
Keyword(s):  
Photosystem Ii ◽  
Light Stress ◽  
High Irradiance ◽  
Light Conditions ◽  
Agricultural Plant ◽  
Photosynthetic Organisms ◽  
Fluctuating Light ◽  
Stress Susceptibility ◽  
Efficiency And Productivity ◽  
Photosynthetic Adaptation

Despite our increasingly sophisticated understanding of mechanisms ensuring efficient photosynthesis under laboratory-controlled light conditions, less is known about the regulation of photosynthesis under fluctuating light. This is important because—in nature—photosynthetic organisms experience rapid and extreme changes in sunlight, potentially causing deleterious effects on photosynthetic efficiency and productivity. Here we report that the chloroplast thylakoid lumenal protein MAINTENANCE OF PHOTOSYSTEM II UNDER HIGH LIGHT 2 (MPH2; encoded byAt4g02530) is required for growth acclimation ofArabidopsis thalianaplants under controlled photoinhibitory light and fluctuating light environments. Evidence is presented thatmph2mutant light stress susceptibility results from a defect in photosystem II (PSII) repair, and our results are consistent with the hypothesis that MPH2 is involved in disassembling monomeric complexes during regeneration of dimeric functional PSII supercomplexes. Moreover,mph2—and previously characterized PSII repair-defective mutants—exhibited reduced growth under fluctuating light conditions, while PSII photoprotection-impaired mutants did not. These findings suggest that repair is not only required for PSII maintenance under static high-irradiance light conditions but is also a regulatory mechanism facilitating photosynthetic adaptation under fluctuating light environments. This work has implications for improvement of agricultural plant productivity through engineering PSII repair.

scholarly journals Exploiting heterogeneous environments: does photosynthetic acclimation optimize carbon gain in fluctuating light?

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 2437-2447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Retkute ◽  
Stephanie E. Smith-Unna ◽  
Robert W. Smith ◽  
Alexandra J. Burgess ◽  
Oliver E. Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photosynthetic Acclimation ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Heterogeneous Environments ◽  
Fluctuating Light

scholarly journals Rate of photosynthetic induction in fluctuating light varies widely among genotypes of wheat

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 2787-2796 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T Salter ◽  
Andrew M Merchant ◽  
Richard A Richards ◽  
Richard Trethowan ◽  
Thomas N Buckley
Keyword(s):  
Photosynthetic Induction ◽  
Fluctuating Light

The photosynthetic response of American chestnut seedlings to differing light conditions

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1714-1722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Joesting ◽  
Brian C. McCarthy ◽  
Kim J. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Deciduous Forest ◽  
Photosynthetic Capacity ◽  
Dark Respiration ◽  
Nitrogen Concentration ◽  
American Chestnut ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Leaf Mass Per Area ◽  
Light Conditions ◽  
Eastern Deciduous Forest

Restoration attempts to reintroduce American chestnut trees to the eastern deciduous forest by means of a disease-resistant Chinese–American hybrid seed are in progress. Knowing the light conditions required for optimum seedling performance is necessary to maximize the success of reintroduction. American chestnut ( Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.) seedlings were planted in two replicate forests in Vinton County, Ohio, in areas that had been thinned (more available light) and in control areas (intact canopy, less available light). The photosynthetic capacity of 12 seedlings per treatment was assessed using an infrared gas-exchange analyzer. Seedlings in the thinned treatment reached light-saturating rates of photosynthesis at an irradiance level approximately 33% higher than did the seedlings in the control treatment. Seedlings grown in the thinned treatment had a significantly greater maximum rate of photosynthesis (Amax), dark respiration rate (Rd), and daily carbon gain per seedling than seedlings grown in the control treatment. The light compensation point (LCP), quantum efficiency (ϕ), leaf mass per area (LMA), and leaf nitrogen concentration per unit leaf area (Narea) were not significantly different between treatments. American chestnut seedlings in the thinned treatment clearly maximize leaf-level photosynthetic capacity. These results will aid land managers in planning reintroduction trials by providing information on the light conditions required for maximum seedling success.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document