An Analytics‐Driven Approach for Optimal Individualized Diabetes Screening

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Kamalzadeh ◽  
Vishal Ahuja ◽  
Michael Hahsler ◽  
Michael E. Bowen
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Screening

Abstract # P-1: Use of Type 2 Diabetes Screening Guidelines in Primary Care: Concordance Between Physician Survey and Medical Records

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Michelle Mocarski ◽  
Sandhya Mehta ◽  
Karin Gillespie ◽  
Tami Wisniewski ◽  
K.M. Venkat Narayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Physician Survey ◽  
Diabetes Screening ◽  
Screening Guidelines

Point-of-Care HbA1c—A Case for Diabetes Screening and Diagnosis

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1518-P
Author(s):  
CARRIE J. SZABLOWSKI ◽  
EMILY SUSCHA ◽  
KADDY DAVIS ◽  
CHARLES Z. XIE ◽  
KEITH MOSKOWITZ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Diabetes Screening ◽  
Screening And Diagnosis

Implementation of the DP-Transfers Project in Catalonia—A Translational Method to Improve Diabetes Screening and Prevention in Primary Care

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2316-PUB
Author(s):  
BERNARDO COSTA ◽  
SANTIAGO MESTRE ◽  
FRANCISCO BARRIO ◽  
JOAN-JOSEP CABRE ◽  
FRANCESC XAVIER COS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Diabetes Screening ◽  
Screening And Prevention

scholarly journals Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110165
Author(s):  
Elaine Seaton Banerjee ◽  
Kyle Shaak ◽  
Nicole Burgess ◽  
Melanie Johnson ◽  
Beth Careyva
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Diabetes Screening ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Us ◽  
History Of ◽  
Missed Diagnosis ◽  
Significant Health

Introduction/Objectives: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. Results: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. Conclusions: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed.

Pregnancy Outcomes Associated with Introduction of Early Diabetes Screening Guidelines

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca E. Weiss ◽  
Nevert Badreldin ◽  
Kathleen Drexler ◽  
Charlotte Niznik ◽  
Lynn M. Yee
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Prenatal Care ◽  
Gestational Weight Gain ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Diabetes Screening ◽  
Early Diabetes ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Gestational Weight

Objective The study aimed to evaluate perinatal outcomes associated with introduction of and adherence to early diabetes screening guidelines. Study Design Retrospective cohort study of all women who received prenatal care at a single, high-volume tertiary care center before (“preguidelines”) and after (“postguidelines”) American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines for early pregnancy diabetes screening for women at high risk for diabetes. Women with known pregestational diabetes, late entry to prenatal care, a fetus with a known anomaly, or multiple gestation were excluded. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were constructed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between women in the preguidelines cohort to those in the postguidelines cohort. Similarly, adherence to screening guidelines was assessed, and among all women who were eligible for early diabetes screening, multivariable linear, and logistic models were created to compare outcomes between those women who were screened early to those who were not. Results Of the 2,069 women eligible for analysis, 64.6% (n = 1,337) were in the postguideline cohort. Women in the postguideline cohort were older, less likely to have a history of smoking, and more likely to be non-Hispanic white. On multivariable analysis, women in the postguideline cohort had significantly less gestational weight gain (aβ = −2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.4 to −1.1), but a higher odds of 5-minute Apgar's score of <7 (adjusted odds ratio: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.11–5.66). Of 461 women who met ACOG early diabetes screening criteria, 58.7% (n = 270) were screened appropriately. Adherence to screening was associated with parity, race, insurance, and BMI. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between women meeting early screening criteria who were screened early and those who were not. Conclusion Introduction of early diabetes screening guidelines was associated with a significant decrease in gestational weight gain, but did not improve neonatal outcomes. Key Points

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document