Benevolent Cruelty: Forced Child Removal, African Refugee Settlers, and the State Mandate of Child Protection

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina Ramsay
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 806-807
Author(s):  
HOWARD DUBOWITZ

Dr Johnson provides interesting data indicating the need for improved training in child maltreatment for pediatric residents. I agree with most of his suggestions and would like to make several additional observations. Even when pediatricians might see themselves in a screening role, it is apparent that a report of child abuse can have far-reaching ramifications, such as removal of the child from the family. Frequently, the state agencies involved in child protection give enormous weight to the medical opinion, perhaps too much at times, and so it becomes important that the initial report be reasonably justified.


2021 ◽  
pp. 705-769
Author(s):  
Polly Morgan

This chapter considers how the Children Act 1989 provided a legal framework within which the state can support children to remain with their families through difficult situations and intervene to protect them when they face unacceptable risks. The chapter starts by giving a brief history of child protection law. The chapter then looks at the inherent tension in protecting children while aspiring to support their life with their families, before considering local authorities' powers and duties, resources, and the ever-increasing numbers of children who are involved with social services, whether as c hildren in need, looked after children, or as subjects of child protection investigations or applications.


2020 ◽  
pp. 311-339
Author(s):  
Khushboo Jain

Childhood is believed to be a stage that requires protection, both in national and international policymaking realms. This essay looks at a few such intersections where lives of certain ‘categories’ of children have been gravely affected by laws meant for their protection and rehabilitation. Through detailed exploration of the making of the anti-child labour law and the category of railway children, this essay argues that repeatedly rehashed state plans of action to address child labour or children in railways situation are dysfunctional because they have abysmally failed to address it with the depth, diversity, and comprehensiveness required. This essay, touching upon case studies of child labour rescue raids conducted by the state in collaboration with NGOs and ethnographic accounts of children who have been rescued, and children who have defined their life and work in their own ways, attempts to explore how ‘childhood’ and ‘child agency’ have become a contested site between children, the existing state and NGO/legal activist/child rights groups discourses on child protection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelley Fong

Each year, U.S. child protection authorities investigate millions of families, disproportionately poor families and families of color. These investigations involve multiple home visits to collect information across numerous personal domains. How does the state gain such widespread entrée into the intimate, domestic lives of marginalized families? Predominant theories of surveillance offer little insight into this process and its implications. Analyzing observations of child maltreatment investigations in Connecticut and interviews with professionals reporting maltreatment, state investigators, and investigated mothers, this article argues that coupling assistance with coercive authority—a hallmark of contemporary poverty governance—generates an expansive surveillance of U.S. families by attracting referrals from adjacent systems. Educational, medical, and other professionals invite investigations of families far beyond those ultimately deemed maltreating, with the hope that child protection authorities’ dual therapeutic and coercive capacities can rehabilitate families, especially marginalized families. Yet even when investigations close, this arrangement, in which service systems channel families to an entity with coercive power, fosters apprehension among families and thwarts their institutional engagement. These findings demonstrate how, in an era of welfare retrenchment, rehabilitative poverty governance renders marginalized populations hyper-visible to the state in ways that may reinforce inequality and marginality.


Raheema ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syamsul Kurniawan

Based on the facts and society complaints on National Child Protection Commission along 2010-2014, the commission concludes that nowadays Indonesia is in the state of “emergency” especially for child violences. Furthermore, the numerous cases of student abuse in madrasah highly rise. This writing elaborates how to manage the leadership and non-violence study towards student in madrasah. Moreover, the action is implemented without violence acts and languages.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Keddell ◽  
Deb Stanfield ◽  
Ian Hyslop

Welcome to this special issue of Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work. The theme for this edition is Child protection, the family and the state: critical responses in neoliberal times.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-187
Author(s):  
Zhiyah Zhulma Zain ◽  
Kurniawati Kurniawati ◽  
Abrar Abrar

Abstrak: Lembaga perlindungan anak merupakan ‘rumah’ terhadap setiap permasalahan anak yang seyogyanya dilindungi oleh negara. Secara konstitusi, penguatan mengenai perlindungan anak berdasarkan Undang-Undang tentang Perlindungan Anak tahun 2002. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana proses awal dan dinamika yang dihadapi oleh lembaga perlindungan anak di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguraikan kelahiran dan dinamika lembaga perlindungan anak di Indonesia (1997-2016). Metode yang digunakan yaitu metode historis yang terdiri dari heuristik, kritik sumber, interpretasi dan historiografi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tahun 1997 dianggap sebagai tonggak lahirnya lembaga perlindungan anak di Indonesia yaitu dengan dibentuknya GNPA oleh Soeharto. Untuk memenuhi legalitas hukum, maka dibentuklah LPA melalui Departemen Sosial. Lembaga ini berubah nama menjadi Komnas PA pada tahun 1999. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak tahun 2002, dibentuk KPAI. Perubahan nama pada lembaga perlindungan anak di Indonesia sejak tahun 1997-2002 merupakan salah satu upaya untuk melegalkan lembaga perlindungan anak. Berbagai permasalahan mengenai anak menjadi salah satu dinamika yang mewarnai lembaga perlindungan anak di Indonesia.  Kata Kunci: Komnas PA, KPAI, LPAI, Perlindungan Anak.Abstract: Child protection institutions are the 'home' for every child's problems that should be protected by the state. Constitutionally, the strengthening of child protection is based on the Act on Child Protection in 2002. The problem in this research is how the initial process and dynamics faced by child protection institutions in Indonesia. This study aims to describe the birth and dynamics of child protection institutions in Indonesia (1997-2016). The method used is the historical method consisting of heuristics, source criticism, interpretation and historiography. The results of this study indicate that 1997 is considered a milestone for the birth of child protection institutions in Indonesia, namely the establishment of GNPA by Suharto. To fulfill legal legality, LPA was formed through the Ministry of Social Affairs. This institution changed its name to Komnas PA in 1999. Based on the 2002 Child Protection Act, the KPAI was formed. The name change of child protection institutions in Indonesia since 1997-2002 is one of the efforts to legalize child protection institutions. Various problems regarding children are one of the dynamics that characterize child protection institutions in Indonesia.Keywords: Komnas PA, KPAI, LPAI, Childs Protectio.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document