Wiley-Blackwell Early View Service

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (146) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Keyword(s):  
Early View

Hegel on the Nature of Scepticism

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 80-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar H. Heidemann
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Human Cognition ◽  
Philosophical Method ◽  
Philosophical Thinking ◽  
Knock Down ◽  
Human Understanding ◽  
Early View ◽  
The One ◽  
Intrinsic Feature

In the Encyclopaedia Logic, Hegel states that ‘philosophy … contains the sceptical as a moment within itself — specifically as the dialectical moment’ (§81, Addition 2), and that ‘scepticism’ as ‘the dialectical moment itself is an essential one in the affirmative Science’ (§78). On the one hand, the connection between scepticism and dialectic is obvious. Hegel claims that scepticism is a problem that cannot be just removed from the philosophical agenda by knock-down anti-sceptical arguments. Scepticism intrinsically belongs to philosophical thinking; that is to say, it plays a constructive role in philosophical thinking. On the other hand, scepticism has to be construed as the view according to which we cannot know whether our beliefs are true, i.e., scepticism plays a destructive role in philosophy no matter what. It is particularly this role that clashes with Hegel's claim of having established a philosophical system of true cognition of the entirety of reality. In the following I argue that for Hegel the constructive and the destructive role of scepticism are reconcilable. I specifically argue that it is dialectic that makes both consistent since scepticism is a constitutive element of dialectic.In order to show in what sense scepticism is an intrinsic feature of dialectic I begin by sketching Hegel's early view of scepticism specifically with respect to logic and metaphysics. The young Hegel construes logic as a philosophical method of human cognition that inevitably results in ‘sceptical’ consequences in that it illustrates the finiteness of human understanding. By doing so, logic not only nullifies finite understanding but also introduces to metaphysics, i.e., the true philosophical science of the absolute.

An Early View of Real-World Patient Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan: A Retrospective Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Drzayich Antol ◽  
Adrianne Waldman Casebeer ◽  
Richard W. DeClue ◽  
Stephen Stemkowski ◽  
Patricia A. Russo
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Real World ◽  
Patient Response ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Early View

Disease Threat, Stereotypes, and Covid–19: An Early View from Malawi and Zambia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Ferree ◽  
Kristen Kao ◽  
Boniface Dulani ◽  
Adam Harris ◽  
Ellen Lust ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early View

The Political Problem

Potentia ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 78-106
Author(s):  
Sandra Leonie Field
Keyword(s):  
State Power ◽  
The State ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Problem ◽  
Early View

This chapter argues that Hobbes’s late view of human collective power, unlike the early view, is able to grasp informal and emergent collective power. Hobbes’s later works, with their new relational conception of potentia, offer both theoretical resources to conceive informal collective power distinct from the state, and also analytical reasons to expect such power to be politically troubling. The ‘political problem’ emerges: in order to achieve the concrete power sufficient to uphold its absolute authority (potestas), the state needs to harness or tame the informal collective powers within the populace. The chapter argues that the political problem explains the absence of the ‘sleeping sovereign’, so central to the radical democratic interpretation of Hobbes, from Hobbes’s later writings. But informal collective power cannot necessarily be celebrated as a welcome popular insurgency against excessive state power: for its characteristic inner structure is complex oligarchic allegiance rather than equal horizontal affiliation.

Succession

Ecology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Ecosystem Management ◽  
Vegetation Dynamics ◽  
Secondary Succession ◽  
Primary Research ◽  
Predictable Process ◽  
History Of ◽  
Successional Change ◽  
Early View

In the field of ecology, the study of succession enjoys a fairly long history, certainly as long as ecology has been recognized as a discipline. Succession was discussed unofficially as early as the nineteenth century, but the term as we understand it today did not appear until the turn of the twentieth century (see History). Succession remains a core tenet within ecology, although it is sometimes subsumed with the broader discussion of vegetation dynamics. The early view that succession is a deterministic, predictable process has changed as ecologists now better appreciate the hierarchical, nonequilibrial nature of communities and ecosystems. Primary research has moved on from simply describing the patterns of primary and secondary successional change. Today’s debates are dominated by the search for a mechanistic understanding and the application of successional theory for ecosystem management, rehabilitation, and restoration. The readings included in this bibliography on issues related to succession include the history of successional studies, primary and secondary succession, successional theory, and applications.

scholarly journals ?Early View?, Immediacy and Impact

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 297-298
Author(s):  
Paul A. Lynn
Keyword(s):  
Early View
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document