Robert Greenleaf Brice, Exploring Certainty: Wittgenstein and Wide Fields of Thought (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2014). xv + 115, price £44.95 hb.

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Keith Dromm
Keyword(s):  
Robert Greenleaf

Robert Greenleaf Leavitt (1865-1942)

Science ◽  
1943 ◽  
Vol 97 (2513) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
Roscoe L. West
Keyword(s):  
Robert Greenleaf

scholarly journals Does Servant Leadership Behavior Induce Positive Behaviors? A Conceptual Study of Servant Leadership, Psychological Safety and Turnover Intention

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.15) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Noor Ahmed Brohi ◽  
Amer Hamzah Jantan ◽  
Sultan Adal Mehmood ◽  
Mansoor Ahmed Khuhro ◽  
Muhammad Saood Aktar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Servant Leadership ◽  
Leadership Style ◽  
Turnover Intention ◽  
Leadership Behavior ◽  
Psychological Safety ◽  
Servant Leaders ◽  
Safe Place ◽  
Positive Behaviors ◽  
Robert Greenleaf ◽  
Conceptual Study

In this paper, we examine how servant leadership and psychological safety may enlighten our understanding of human mechanisms that affect follower outcomes. Servant leadership style as penned by Robert Greenleaf that servant leaders guide followers to adopt the behavior of their leaders by putting others needs above their own. From emerging research on servant leadership, we proposed a model contending that servant leaders increase employees’ psychological safety that organization is a safe place to speak up ideas, opinions and take decisions, which directly influences Employees’ turnover intention. As proposed, servant leadership will be negatively related to Employees’ turnover intention and positively related to psychological safety. Psychological safety will mediate the relationship between servant leadership and turnover intention. 

scholarly journals Model Kepemimpinan Kristiani Berbasis Teologi Persahabatan

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-115
Author(s):  
Alvian Apriano
Keyword(s):  
Robert Greenleaf

Dewasa ini, diskusi tentang model kepemimpinan kristiani umumnya diidentikan dengan model kepemimpinan pelayan yang diwariskan oleh Robert Greenleaf. Model kepemimpinan ini diklaim kontekstual, karena merepresentasikan model kepemimpinan Yesus yang dilaporkan kitab-kitab Injil. Padahal, Yesus juga menampilkan sisi persahabatan dalam model kepemimpinannya. Di dalam persoalan ini, muncullah pertanyaan-pertanyaan eksistensial-teologis, “Dapatkah kekristenan merealisasikan sebuah model kepemimpinan berbasis persahabatan? Seperti apa kekuatan dan kelemahannya? Bagaimana bentuk dan penerapan modelnya?” Pemikiran Liz Charmichael dan Steve Summers dengan analisa mereka yang kualitatif-teologis terhadap teori dan praktik persahabatan akan membantu menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan tersebut. Pemikiran keduanya akan dielaborasi sehingga menghasilkan empat karakter pemimpin yang bersahabat. Makalah ini hendak menghadirkan model kepemimpinan kristiani berbasis teologi persahabatan berdasarkan penilaian kritis atas konsep kepemimpinan-pelayan guna memperluas khazanah kepemimpinan kristiani yang relevan baik di dalam komunitas gereja dan marketplace.

Historical Derivative of Servant Leadership and the Untold Story of the Influence of Quakerism on Greenleaf's Teachings

2014 ◽  
pp. 244-261
Author(s):  
Tiffany L. Beaver
Keyword(s):  
Servant Leadership ◽  
Religious Influences ◽  
Widespread Adoption ◽  
Robert Greenleaf

Robert Greenleaf reignited an interest in servant leadership; however, the concept is far from nascent. The multivariate religious influences glistening throughout servant leadership, orchestrate a mosaic imbued with benevolence and service. Although servant leadership transcends religion, the Quaker influence on how Greenleaf approached and taught servant leadership is significant yet gregariously absent in the literature. This chapter navigates the unexplored relationship between servant leadership and Quakerism. The chapter additionally encourages more widespread adoption of Smith's servant leadership paradigm, which goes beyond inverting the leadership paradigm and instead blurs the lines between leading and following, resembling a neurological infrastructure. The kaleidoscopic shift that servant leadership imbues maximizes the powerhouse of knowledge inherent in all organizations.

Measuring Servant Leadership

2014 ◽  
pp. 211-242
Author(s):  
Claudio Pousa
Keyword(s):  
Servant Leadership ◽  
Final Section ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Operational Definition ◽  
Clear Picture ◽  
Measuring Instruments ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Robert Greenleaf ◽  
Definition Of

The concept of Servant Leadership was introduced by Robert Greenleaf in the 1970s, and although in his works there is a very clear picture of servant leadership in philosophical terms, there is not an empirically validated definition of servant leadership. For this reason, numerous scholars worked individually on developing competing frameworks to define servant leadership since the mid-1990s; the result is that, throughout the scientific literature, the construct of servant leadership is defined by an inconsistent set of dimensions and there is still no consensus about an operational definition of the construct. In a similar way, since the end of the 1990s, numerous scholars developed different scales to measure servant leadership, based on different operational definitions. Accordingly, there is not an agreed upon measure of Servant Leadership; a few measures were used in a limited number of studies, and a relatively large number of measures were used in less than two. The chapter presents the most significant and used operational definitions, a detailed description of the development of the different measuring instruments, as well as a reference to some of the studies that used them, and a final section where the advantages and disadvantages of using certain measures are presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document