Why is corneal donation so rare in children’s hospices? A survey of multidisciplinary team members attitudes, knowledge, practice, and experience

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Giugni ◽  
Costanza Cecchi ◽  
Claudia Santucci ◽  
Sabrina Giometto ◽  
Ersilia Lucenteforte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Knowledge Practice ◽  
Corneal Donation

Food for Thought

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caryn Easterling
Keyword(s):  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Expected Outcome

Our professional American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) guidelines state, if a speech-language pathologist suspects on the basis of the clinical history that there may be an esophageal disorder contributing to the patient's dysphagia, then “An esophageal screening can be incorporated into most [videofluoroscopic swallowing studies, or] VFSS” (ASHA, 2004). However, the esophageal screen has not been defined by ASHA or by the American College of Radiology. This “Food for Thought” column suggests deglutologists work together to determine the procedure and expected outcome for the esophageal screen so that there is acceptance and consensus among the multidisciplinary team members who evaluate patients with dysphagia.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary team meetings in community mental health: a systematic review of their functions

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caoimhe Nic a Bháird ◽  
Penny Xanthopoulou ◽  
Georgia Black ◽  
Susan Michie ◽  
Nora Pashayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Community Mental Health Services ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Meetings ◽  
Unwarranted Variation ◽  
The Uk

Purpose – Previous research has identified a need for greater clarity regarding the functions of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings in UK community mental health services. The purpose of this paper is to identify the functions of these meetings by systematically reviewing both primary research and academic discussion papers. Design/methodology/approach – Papers relating to adult community mental health teams (CMHTs) in the UK and published between September 1999 and February 2014 were reviewed and appraised using NICE quality checklists. The search was broad in scope to include both general CMHTs and specialist CMHTs such as early intervention psychosis services and forensic mental health teams. A thematic synthesis of the findings was performed to develop an overarching thematic framework of the reported functions of MDT meetings. Findings – None of the 4,046 studies identified directly investigated the functions of MDT meetings. However, 49 mentioned functions in passing. These functions were categorised into four thematic domains: discussing the care of individual patients, teamwork, team management and learning and development. Several papers reported a lack of clarity about the purpose of MDT meetings and the roles of different team members which hindered effective collaboration. Practical implications – Without clearly agreed objectives for MDT meetings, monitoring their effectiveness is problematic. Unwarranted variation in their functioning may undermine the quality of care. Originality/value – This is the first systematic review to investigate the functions of CMHT MDT meetings in the UK. The findings highlight a need for empirical research to establish how MDT meetings are being used so that their effectiveness can be understood, monitored and evaluated.

scholarly journals Palliative care in paediatric oncology: perceptions, expertise and practices from the perspective of the multidisciplinary team

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Ferreira da Silva ◽  
Helena Becker Issi ◽  
Maria da Graça Corso da Motta ◽  
Daisy Zanchi de Abreu Botene
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Paediatric Oncology ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
The Family ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Oncology Unit

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the perceptions, expertise and practices of multi-professional teams providing palliative care to children in a paediatric oncology unit. The research questions were based on everyday care, facilitations and difficulties, essential aspects of professional approaches, and the inter-disciplinary focus of care for children in palliative care and their families. METHOD: Qualitative, exploratory and descriptive research. Data were collected from June to October 2013 from nine professional multidisciplinary team members by means of a semi-structured interview submitted to thematic analysis. RESULTS: The following four themes emerged from analysis: palliative care: conceptions of the multi-professional team; the construction of singular care; the facilitations and difficulties experienced by the team and significant lessons learned. CONCLUSIONS: The subjects revealed that the team also suffers with the death of a child and, like the family, moves toward the construction of coping mechanisms for the elaboration of mourning. Paradoxically, the team shares knowledge to determine the foundations of a singular therapeutic project and inserts the family in this process so that it can be the protagonist of the child's care.

scholarly journals Physicians’ Perceptions of the Type 2 Diabetes Multi-disciplinary Treatment Team

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 794-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn D. Ritholz ◽  
Elizabeth A. Beverly ◽  
Martin J. Abrahamson ◽  
Kelly M. Brooks ◽  
Brittney A. Hultgren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Diabetes Treatment ◽  
Treatment Team ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Treatment ◽  
Consistent Information

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore physicians’ perceptions of the multidisciplinary type 2 diabetes treatment team. Methods Nineteen physicians (74% endocrinologists; 26% primary care) participated in semistructured interviews. Audiorecorded data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo 8 software. Results Physicians considered the multidisciplinary team, including a physician and diabetes educator, as very important to diabetes treatment. Participants described how diabetes, with its many comorbidities and challenging lifestyle recommendations, is difficult for any single physician to treat. They further described how the team’s diverse staff offers complementary skills and more contact time for assessment and treatment of patients, developing treatment relationships, and supporting patients in learning diabetes self-care. Physicians stressed the necessity of regular and ongoing communication among team members to ensure patients receive consistent information, and some reported that institutional factors interfere with intra-team communication. They also expressed concerns about the team approach in relation to individualized treatment and patients’ reluctance to see multiple providers. Conclusions This study highlights physicians’ positive perceptions of and concerns about the type 2 diabetes multidisciplinary team. Further study of diabetes educators’ and patients’ perceptions of the team approach is needed.

A Process of Multidisciplinary Team Communication to Individualize Stroke Rehabilitation of an 84-Year-Old Stroke Patient

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fukumi Hiragami ◽  
Shogo Hiragami ◽  
Yasuo Suzuki
Keyword(s):  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Knowledge Assessment ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Mobility Impairments ◽  
Patient Families ◽  
Initial Meeting

Previously, we have used a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to individualize rehabilitation of very old stroke patients as a means to establish intervention points for addressing impaired activities of daily living (ADL). However, this previous study was limited because of a lack in describing the communication process over time. This case study characterized the MDT communication process in the rehabilitation of an 84-year-old patient over the course of 15 weeks. The MDT consisted of 3 nurses, 1 doctor, 6 therapists, and the patient/families. Meetings (15 minutes each) were held at 4, 6, 8, and 15 weeks following the patient’s admission. To individualize the rehabilitation, the communication process involved gaining knowledge about ADL impairments, sharing assessments, providing treatment options, and reflecting on desired treatment outcomes—a process termed KATR. The knowledge, assessment, treatment, and reflection (KATR) process established intervention points focusing on specific ADL impairments. The team members focused the interventions on the impaired ADL identified in the KATR process, and individualized rehabilitation was generated from the MDT information-sharing knowledge. In the initial meeting (Week 4), intervention points derived from the KATR process focused on rehabilitation of self-care impairments. These impairments improved by Week 15. By the last meeting, the MDT intervention points focused on mobility impairments. Having an organized communication process (i.e., KATR) facilitates individualization of rehabilitation without lengthy and frequent MDT meetings and enhances the quality of rehabilitation after a stroke.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document