YouTube videos in Japanese as a source of information on nocturnal enuresis: a content‐quality and reliability analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoto Nishizaki ◽  
Daishi Hirano ◽  
Kimihiko Oishi ◽  
Toshiaki Shimizu
Keyword(s):  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Nocturnal Enuresis ◽  
Content Quality ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Quality And Reliability ◽  
Source Of Information

scholarly journals YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. e109-e114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle N. Kunze ◽  
Matthew R. Cohn ◽  
Connor Wakefield ◽  
Fadi Hamati ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Content Quality ◽  
Quality And Reliability ◽  
Source Of Information

scholarly journals Quality and Reliability of Halitosis Videos on YouTube as a Source of Information

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Atik Ramadhani ◽  
Zenobia Zettira ◽  
Yuanita Lely Rachmawati ◽  
Ninuk Hariyani ◽  
Diah Ayu Maharani
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Common Condition ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Interaction Index ◽  
Content Quality ◽  
Quality And Reliability ◽  
Source Category ◽  
Source Of Information

Halitosis is a common condition that adversely affects quality of life. Through YouTube, people access oral health information. This study aimed to analyze the quality and comprehensiveness of the content, and reliability of halitosis videos hosted on YouTube. In total, 300 videos were collected based on three search keywords, and the number of likes, dislikes, views, duration, interaction index, viewing rate, and source category. Subsequently, the video score, which represents the content quality and comprehensiveness was used to categorize videos as poor, good, and excellent. DISCERN score was used to assess video reliability. Of the 105 videos analyzed, 68 (64.8%) were uploaded by personal users. In general, videos were categorized as poor and have low reliability. Videos sourced from healthcare professionals showed the highest quality, comprehensiveness of the content, and reliability (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the number of viewers for video duration less than or more than 4 min (p > 0.05). YouTube users prefer low-quality videos over high-quality ones, indicating that viewers cannot differentiate between reliable and potentially biased content. It is critical to enable viewers to critically assimilate information hosted on YouTube to make effective oral healthcare decisions.

Are YouTube videos qualified and reliable as a source of information for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey? (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saliha Bozdogan Yesilot ◽  
Ayse Inel Manav ◽  
Hatice Ciftci
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Quality And Reliability ◽  
Turkish Language ◽  
Source Of Information

BACKGROUND Online Health Information has become more important in terms of Pandemic. YouTube is an online platform that people broadly use as a search tool for health information. The quality and reliability of YouTube videos containing health information range from low to high according to literature. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the quality, reliability, and comprehensiveness of contents for YouTube videos in the Turkish language as a source of information for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This was a descriptive study. "Coronavirus Mental Health" was searched as a subject on the YouTube channel in the Turkish language on April 11th, 2020. The first 100 videos were taken into consideration. Two independent reviewers classified videos as useful or misleading. The inter-observer agreement was evaluated with the kappa coefficient. Modified DISCERN index for reliability and Global Quality Scale for quality were used. The content was evaluated with a checklist developed by the researchers. RESULTS The mean number of views was 1442.42±3042.49 for useful videos and 1044±1471.83 for misleading videos. The mean Global Quality Scale was 2.68±0.96 for useful videos and 1±0 for misleading videos. The mean DISCERN score was 2.8±1.09, 2.72±0.75, and 3.12±0.66 for shared by independent/professional users, government/news agencies, and universities/professional organizations respectively. CONCLUSIONS The quality and reliability level of mental health videos in the Turkish language for the COVID-19 pandemic was found out moderate. Moreover, the comprehensiveness of contents didn’t include enough detailed information in regards to protecting mental health. CLINICALTRIAL NA

Assesment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Bone Tumor on Youtube (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sezgin Bahadır Tekin ◽  
Erman Öğümsöğütlü
Keyword(s):  
Bone Tumors ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Treatment Compliance ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Content Quality ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Quality And Reliability

UNSTRUCTURED Introduction: Our aim is to assess the content quality and reliability of YouTube videos on bone tumors. Methods: We searched YouTube using the keyword “bone tumors,” and included in our study the first 50 videos listed. Two orthopedic surgeons analyzed the videos, and then, we examined them in terms of length, number of views and likes, and source. To evaluate their content quality, the Global Quality Score (GQS) (0–4), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) (0–5), and DISCERN (15–75) scoring systems were used; based on these, the obtained data were statistically analyzed. Results: Of the 50 videos analyzed, four (8%) included animation, while 46 (92%) did not; 12 (24%) were uploaded by doctors, 23 (46%) by health channels, 10 (20%) by universities, three (6%) by clinics, and one (2%) each by a hospital and a trainer. The average video length was 16 minutes 18 seconds (38-6088 seconds), average number of views 14,856.24, and average number of likes 130.50 (1-1448). The mean scores of GQS, JAMA, and DISCERN were 2.22 (1-4), 2.12 (1-3), and 33.48 (15-75), respectively. There was no statistical significance in the scores and video length, or the number of likes and views between the two researchers. Discussion: YouTube videos on bone tumors have low content quality. Improvement of the same will help dispense correct information to patients, so that they can continue their treatment. We believe that patient treatment compliance can be increased by accelerating the patient’s preparation and adaptation process for treatment with accurate information.

Evaluation of the Content Quality of YouTube Videos on Alternate Therapies for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-155
Author(s):  
Sarvesh Sawant ◽  
Aswathi Nair ◽  
Shaik Aisha Sultana ◽  
Arjun Rajendran ◽  
Kapil Chalil Madathil
Keyword(s):  
Content Quality ◽  
Youtube Videos

Cleft Lip and Palate YouTube Videos: Content Usefulness and Sentiment Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562094872
Author(s):  
Aylin Pasaoglu Bozkurt ◽  
Isıl Aras
Keyword(s):  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Psychological State ◽  
Term Therapy ◽  
Content Quality ◽  
Negative Comments ◽  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Long Term Therapy

Objective: This study aimed to describe the content of YouTube videos about cleft lip and palate (CLP) and to describe the sentiment analysis of related comments. Design: Retrospective, YouTube video, and sentiment analysis. Methods: YouTube videos (N = 112) about CLP were examined, including demographics and ratings of quality and usefulness. Comments on CLP (N = 205) were classified by content, and measured from negative (−5) to positive (+5) with a sentiment analysis program. Results: Videos were uploaded most often by universities and hospitals (25%) and health information sites (22%). Most videos were educational (49.1%) or described patient experiences (48.2%). The most frequent video topics were terminology, CLP treatment, and prenatal diagnosis information. Based on the comprehensiveness of CLP topics covered, videos were generally rated by authors as moderately useful (31.5%) or very useful (35.7%). Comments were mostly made by people with CLP (79%), and the median sentiment scores were +3, and −2 for positive and negative sentiments, respectively. General content categories were positive comments (24.8%), provided information about themselves (24.4%), negative comments (19.5%), comments on usefulness of video (17.6%), or advice (9.3%). While 36.1% of comments noted no difficulties, the remaining comments included difficulties with surgery pain (13.2%), psychological state (12.2%), embarrassment (11.7%), physical appearance (10.2%), long term therapy (9.8%), and speech problems (6.8%). Conclusions: Although useful and educational YouTube videos were available, the variability of content quality suggests that caution be used in relying on videos for information and that experts in CLP treatment should be consulted.

YouTube videos as a source of information about mastectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Clarke Hillyer ◽  
Corey H. Basch ◽  
Sharon Guerro ◽  
Paul Sackstein ◽  
Charles E. Basch
Keyword(s):  
Youtube Videos ◽  
Source Of Information
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document