Comparison of midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters to reduce the need for general anesthesia in children with respiratory disease: A feasibility randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricia M Kleidon ◽  
Jessica A Schults ◽  
Claire Wainwright ◽  
Gabor Mihala ◽  
Victoria Gibson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Central Catheters

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Single Doses of Intravenous Paracetamol for Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Preterm Infants

Neonatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniella W.E. Roofthooft ◽  
Sinno H.P. Simons ◽  
Richard A. van Lingen ◽  
Dick Tibboel ◽  
John N. van den Anker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol ◽  
Central Catheters

scholarly journals Effect of video-assisted education on informed consent and patient education for peripherally inserted central catheters: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 030006052094791
Author(s):  
Jia Li ◽  
Xue-fang Huang ◽  
Jie-lin Luo ◽  
Jiang-yun Zhang ◽  
Xiao-lin Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Central Catheters

Objective To evaluate the effects of a video-assisted education intervention on informed consent and patient education for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects on informed consent of video-assisted patient education and traditional face-to-face discussion in a catheter outpatient ward of a cancer centre in Guangzhou, China, in 2018. Participants were 140 patients randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two groups: video-assisted or traditional intervention. General information, patient retention of PICC-related information, working time spent by nurses on the procedure, and patient and nurse satisfaction with the procedure were assessed. Results The time used for informed consent was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.02 ± 0.24 minutes) than in the control group (6.87 ± 1.10 minutes). The time used for PICC-related education was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.03 ± 0.28 minutes) than in the control group (5.11 ± 0.57 minutes). Nurses’ degree of satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in the experimental group (4.10 ± 0.57) than in the control group (2.60 ± 0.70). Conclusion The use of video-assisted informed consent and patient education in this cancer centre decreased nurses’ working time and improved nurses’ satisfaction. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800015664

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document