Impact of treatment crossovers on clinical outcomes in the rate and rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation: Insights from the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management) trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 770-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Maan ◽  
Zheng Zhang ◽  
Ziling Qin ◽  
Yanbing Wang ◽  
Samuel Dudley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Rhythm Control

scholarly journals An Observational, Prospective Survey Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation in Asia Pacific: Rationale and Design of the RecordAF-AP Registry

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. CMC.S6289 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Amerena ◽  
Shih-Ann Chen ◽  
Charn Sriratanasathavorn ◽  
Jeong-Gwan Cho ◽  
Huang Dejia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Significant Public Health Problem ◽  
Significant Public Health

Background The literature suggests that the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) may be lower in Asian countries than in Western countries. Nevertheless, AF remains a significant public health problem in the region. The burden of AF, the experiences of previous trials and the lack of data on AF and its management in Asia Pacific highlight the need for a comprehensive prospective study of AF management. Methods The REgistry on Cardiac rhythm disORDers assessing the control of Atrial Fibrillation Asia Pacific (RecordAF-AP) is a prospective, observational survey of the management of recently diagnosed AF patients with 1-year follow-up in 8 countries across Asia Pacific. Eligible patients presenting with AF, treated or not, will be included in the registry and data will be recorded prospectively during follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months. Results RecordAF-AP will recruit more than 3000 patients. Study recruitment commenced in April 2009 and the final results anticipated at the end of 2011. Conclusions RecordAF-AP will assess the real-life management of AF patients in Asia Pacific, including a comparison of clinical outcomes in rhythm versus rate control strategies, providing much needed insight into the costs, treatment choices and clinical outcomes of AF patients in this region.

scholarly journals Plasma natriuretic peptide level is an independent determinant of major clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients without heart failure: the Fushimi AF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hamatani ◽  
M Iguchi ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
K Ishigami ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of death, stroke/systemic embolism and heart failure (HF). Plasma natriuretic peptide (NP) level is an important prognostic marker in HF patients. However, little is known regarding the prognostic significance of plasma NP level in AF patients without HF. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between plasma NP level and clinical outcomes such as all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization during follow-up period in AF patients without HF. Methods The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in our city. The inclusion criterion of the registry is the documentation of AF at 12-lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring at any time, and there are no exclusion criteria. We started to enroll patients from March 2011, and follow-up data were available for 4,466 patients by the end of November 2019. From the registry, we excluded 1,220 patients without a pre-existing HF (defined as having one of the following; prior hospitalization for HF, New York Heart Association class ≥2, or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%). Among 3,246 AF patients without HF, we investigated 1,189 patients with the data of plasma BNP (n=401) or N-terminal pro-BNP (n=788) level at the enrollment. We divided the patients according to the quartile of each plasma BNP or NT-pro BNP level and compared the backgrounds and outcomes between these 4 groups stratified by plasma NP level. Results Of 1,189 patients, the mean age was 72.1±10.2 years, 454 (38%) were female and 684 (58%) were paroxysmal AF. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score were 1.6±1.1 and 2.9±1.5, respectively. Oral anticoagulants were prescribed in 671 (56%) at baseline. The median (interquartile range) BNP and N-terminal pro-BNP level were 84 (38, 176) and 500 (155, 984) pg/ml, respectively. Patients with high plasma NP level were older, and demonstrated lower prevalence of paroxysmal AF, higher CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulants prescription (all P<0.01). A total of 165 all-cause death, 114 stroke/systemic embolism and 103 HF hospitalization occurred during the median follow-up period of 5.0 years. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that higher plasma NP level was significantly associated with the incidences of all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF (Figure 1A). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that plasma NP level could stratify the risk of clinical outcomes even after adjustment by type of AF, CHA2DS2-VASc score, chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulant prescription (Figure 1B). Conclusion Plasma NP level is a significant prognostic marker for all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF, suggesting the importance of measuring plasma NP level in AF patients even without HF. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes following rhythm control for atrial fibrillation: is early better?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Kotalczyk ◽  
Wern Yew Ding ◽  
Dhiraj Gupta ◽  
David Justin Wright ◽  
Gregory Y. H. Lip
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rhythm Control

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of Japanese atrial fibrillation patients with combined valvular heart disease: the Fushimi AF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Doi ◽  
K Ishigami ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
Y Hamatani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Valve Disease ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background We previously reported that valvular heart disease (VHD) was not at the significant risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), but was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in Japanese atrial fibrillation patients. However, the impact of combined VHD on clinical outcomes has been little known. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of combined VHD and its clinical characteristics and impact on outcomes such as stroke/SE, all-cause death, cardiac death and hospitalization for HF. Method The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in one of the wards of our city which is a typical urban district of Japan. We started to enroll patients from March 2011, and follow-up data were available for 4,466 patients by the end of November 2019. In the entire cohort, echocardiography data were available for 3,574 patients. 68 AF patients with prosthetic heart valves were excluded and we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between 488 single VHD (103 Aortic valve disease (AVD), 315 mitral valve disease (MVD), 70 tricuspid valve disease (TVD)) and 158 combined VHD (46 AVD and MVD, 11 AVD and TVD, 66 MVD and TVD, 35 AVD and MVD and TVD). Result Compared with single VHD, patients with combined VHD were older (combined vs. single VHD: 78.5 vs. 76.0 years, respectively; p<0.01), more likely to have persistent/permanent type AF (73.4% vs. 63.9%, p=0.02) and prescription of warfarin (63.1% vs. 53.8%, p=0.04). Combined VHD was less likely to have diabetes mellitus (13.9% vs. 23.6%, p=0.01) and dyslipidemia (26.6% vs. 40.4%, p<0.01). Sex, body weight, hypertension, pre-existing HF were comparable between the two groups. During the median follow-up of 1,474 days, the incidence rate of stroke/SE was not significantly different between the two groups (1.58 vs. 1.89 per 100 person-years, respectively, log rank p=0.10). The incidence rate of all-cause death (7.35 vs. 5.33, p=0.65), cardiac death (1.20 vs. 0.99, p=0.91) and hospitalization for HF (5.55 vs. 4.43, p=0.53) were also not significantly different. We previously reported AVD had significant impacts on cardiac adverse outcomes in AF patients, and we further analyzed event rates between combined VHD including AVD (AVD and MVD/TVD) and without AVD (MVD and TVD). Combined VHD with AVD group had higher incidence rate of all-cause death (10.7 vs. 5.79, p=0.03) than that without AVD group. However, the incidence rate of stroke/SE (1.98 vs. 1.56, p=0.59), cardiac death (0.98 vs. 1.14, p=0.68), hospitalization for HF (8.03 vs. 5.38, p=0.17) were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion As compared with single VHD, the risk of stroke/SE, all-cause death, cardiac death and hospitalization for HF in combined VHD was not significantly different. Among patients with combined VHD, those having AVD had higher incidence rate of all-cause death than those without AVD. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Impact of Anticoagulation Clinic Intervention on Patient Centred Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sunil Kumar ◽  
Oliver Joel Gona ◽  
Nagaraj Desai ◽  
B Shyam Prasad Shetty ◽  
KS Poornima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Therapeutic Range ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Anticoagulation Clinic ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Co Morbidity

Introduction: Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) have been in use for more than 50 years. They have remained as mainstay therapy in the prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valves and venous thromboembolism. Despite many years of clinical experience with VKAs, the quality of anticoagulation achieved in routine clinical practice is suboptimal. Aim: To study the effects of structured Anticoagulation Clinic (ACC) interventions on patient centred outcomes in subjects taking VKAs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among patients taking VKAs enrolled in ACC. A total of 169 patients receiving VKAs for at least six months with 4 INR (International Normalised Ratio) values and completed 12 months of follow-up were analysed. Anticoagulation related quality measures like Time in the Therapeutic Range (TTR), Percentage of International Normalised Ratios in the therapeutic Range (PINRR) and clinical outcomes like stroke, systemic embolic events and bleeding was analysed at the time of enrolment and compared with those during ACC care. Results: Among 352 patients enrolled in ACC, 169 patients were eligible for analysis. The mean age of the study population was 55.62±13.77 years. Atrial fibrillation (59%) was the most common indication for VKA therapy. Hypertension (66.3%) was the most common co-morbidity. Mean TTRs were significantly higher in the ACC care when compared with the pre-ACC care at 12 months follow-up (77.58±8.85% vs 51.01±16.7%, p<0.0001). There was a significant improvement in TTRs as early as three months of ACC intervention (73.18±13.56%). At the time of enrolment, 21.9% of patients had individual TTRs (i-TTR) >70% which increased to 70.4% at 12 months of follow-up. INR testing was done more frequently in ACC care. Adverse clinical events were higher in pre-ACC care than ACC care (4.7% vs 2.4%, p>0.05). Major bleeding and thromboembolic events were higher in pre-ACC care than ACC care (1.8% vs. 0.6% and 2.4% vs. 0.6% respectively). Conclusion: ACC services helps in achieving better quality of anticoagulation control as measured by time in therapeutic range translating into better clinical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document