Impact of Using a Telescoping-Support Catheter System for Left Ventricular Lead Placement on Implant Success and Procedure Time of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEVIN P. JACKSON ◽  
DONALD D. HEGLAND ◽  
CAMILLE FRAZIER-MILLS ◽  
JONATHAN P. PICCINI ◽  
JASON I. KOONTZ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Lead ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Lead Placement ◽  
Ventricular Lead ◽  
Catheter System ◽  
Left Ventricular Lead Placement

scholarly journals Feasibility and Efficacy of Left Ventricular Lead Placement Guided by Subselection Inner Catheter Alone in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuto Hayasaka ◽  
Takeshi Sasaki ◽  
Ko Akimoto ◽  
Kento Yabe ◽  
Chisashi Toya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Lead ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Lead Placement ◽  
Ventricular Lead ◽  
Left Ventricular Lead Placement

Introduction: Subselection inner catheters (Inner-Cath) are used adjunctively with outer guiding catheters (Outer-Cath) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of left ventricular lead placement (LV-LP) guided by Inner-Cath alone. Methods: A total of 74 patients undergoing de novo CRT implantation were investigated. LV-LP was initially guided by Inner-Cath in 42 patients (Inner-Cath group) and Outer-Cath in 32 patients (Outer-Cath group). In the Inner-Cath group, a 7Fr Inner-Cath was advanced to the coronary sinus through a 7 Fr sheath inserted in a subclavian vein. In the Outer-Cath group , 9Fr or 10Fr Outer-Caths were used. Success rate of LV-LP, additional use of inner or outer catheters and procedure-related complications were compared between groups. Results: LV-LP was successful in all patients in the Inner-Cath group while LV-LP had to be abandoned in 2 patients of the Outer-Cath group due to CS perforation caused by Outer-Cath manipulation. Procedure time was significantly shorter in the Inner-Cath group (148 vs 168 min; P=0.024). Deployment of both an inner and outer cath became necessary less frequently for the Inner-Cath group (4.8% vs 56.3%; P<0.001). Mechanical CS injuries due to guiding catheter manipulation were only observed in the Outer-Cath group (0% vs 15.6%, P=0.013). Conclusion: LV-LP guided by Inner-Cath alone was feasible in over 95% of the patients without severe complications. This methodology for LV-LP may be preferable in CRT candidates with severe LV dysfunction in terms of shorter procedure time, smaller guiding sheath and less complications.

scholarly journals Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (17) ◽  
pp. 1509-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fakhar Z. Khan ◽  
Mumohan S. Virdee ◽  
Christopher R. Palmer ◽  
Peter J. Pugh ◽  
Denis O'Halloran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Lead ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Lead Placement ◽  
Ventricular Lead ◽  
Left Ventricular Lead Placement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document