scholarly journals Longitudinal Capsulotomy in Hip Arthroscopy: A Safe and Feasible Procedure for Cam‐Type Femoracetabular Impingement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing‐Feng Yin ◽  
Long Wang ◽  
Tao Liang ◽  
Heng Zhao ◽  
Xue‐song Wang
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1153-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Liu ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Qi Gui ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Xue‐Zhen Shen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1721-1729
Author(s):  
Hsueh Yang ◽  
Mingke You ◽  
Ya Li ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Taolin Qin ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
Richard E. Strain ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract The primary function of the acetabular labrum, like that of the glenoid, is to deepen the socket and improve joint stability. Tears of the acetabular labrum are common in older adults but occur in all age groups and with equal frequency in males and females. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, is silent about rating tears, partial or complete excision, or repair of the acetabular labrum. Provocative tests to detect acetabular labrum tears involve hip flexion and rotation; all rely on production of pain in the groin (typically), clicking, and/or locking with passive or active hip motions. Diagnostic tests or procedures rely on x-rays, conventional arthrography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), and hip arthroscopy. Hip arthroscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis but is the most invasive and most likely to result in complications, and MRA is about three times more sensitive and accurate in detecting acetabular labral tears than MRI alone. Surgical treatment for acetabular labrum tears usually consists of arthroscopic debridement; results tend to be better in younger patients. In general, an acetabular labral tear, partial labrectomy, or labral repair warrants a rating of 2% lower extremity impairment. Evaluators should avoid double dipping (eg, using both a Diagnosis-related estimates and limited range-of-motion tests).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing‐feng Yin ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Tao Liang ◽  
Yu‐jie Liu ◽  
Shan‐xing Zhang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002199626
Author(s):  
Oliver Eberhardt ◽  
Thekla von Kalle ◽  
Rebecca Matthis ◽  
Richard Doepner ◽  
Thomas Wirth ◽  
...  

Introduction: It is often difficult to clinically and radiologically diagnose intra-articular osteoid osteomas and osteoid osteomas of the hip joint. Treatment can also be difficult due to complex locational relationships. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation is currently the standard form of treatment. In this paper we report on a minimally-invasive concept for treating osteoid osteomas near the hip joint in children and adolescents which does not involve using computed tomography. Material and method: 10 patients with an average age of 12.1 years underwent treatment for osteoid osteomas in the hip joint region. The diagnosis was made using a contrast-enhanced MRI. The osteoid osteomas were marked percutaneously using x-ray and MRI guidance. MRI-guided drilling/curettage was performed in 4 cases and arthroscopic resection in 6 cases. Results: All lesions were successfully treated using the MRI-guided method. All patients were free of pain after the treatment. There was no instance of recurrence during the follow-up period, which averaged 10 months. The effective dose for marking the lesion was between 0.0186 mSv and 0.342 mSV (mean 0.084 mSV). Conclusions: Our MRI diagnostics protocol, the MRI-guided drilling and the minimally invasive hip arthroscopy represent an alternative to CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteomas. Radiation exposure can thereby be significantly reduced. Hip arthroscopy can also be used to treat secondary pathologies such as femoroacetabular impingement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document