In vitro comparison of dental implant site preparation with ultrasonic system and conventional rotatory system

Oral Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116
Author(s):  
A. Lanata‐Flores ◽  
E.H.L. Nascimento ◽  
D.R. Goulart ◽  
F. Haiter‐Neto ◽  
M. Moraes ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-266
Author(s):  
Claudio Stacchi ◽  
Matteo De Biasi ◽  
Lucio Torelli ◽  
Massimo Robiony ◽  
Roberto Di Lenarda ◽  
...  

The primary objective of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of implant site preparation technique (drills vs ultrasonic instrumentation) on the primary stability of short dental implants with two different designs inserted in simulated low-quality cancellous bone. Eighty implant sites were prepared in custom-made solid rigid polyurethane blocks with two different low cancellous bone densities (5 or 15 pounds per cubic foot [PCF]), equally distributed between piezoelectric (Surgysonic Moto, Esacrom, Italy) and conventional drilling techniques. Two short implant systems (Prama and Syra, Sweden & Martina) were tested by inserting 40 fixtures of each system (both 6.0 mm length and 5.0 mm diameter), divided in the four subgroups (drills/5 PCF density; drills/15 PCF density; piezo/5 PCF density; piezo/15 PCF density). Insertion torque (Ncm), implant stability quotient values, removal torque (Ncm), and surgical time were recorded. Data were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and Scheffé's test (α = 0.05). With slight variations among the considered dependent variables, overall high primary implant stability was observed across all subgroups. Piezoelectric instrumentation allowed for comparable or slightly superior primary stability in comparison with the drilling procedures in both implant systems. The Prama implants group showed the highest mean reverse torque and Syra implants the highest implant stability quotient values. Piezoelectric implant site preparation took prolonged operative time compared to conventional preparation with drills; among the drilling procedures, Syra system required fewer surgical steps and shorter operative time.


2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 985-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich ◽  
Ali Modabber ◽  
Timm Steiner ◽  
David A. Mitchell ◽  
Frank Hölzle

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke ◽  
Raphaél Bettach ◽  
Silvio Taschieri ◽  
Gilles Boukhris ◽  
Stefano Corbella ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1301-1304
Author(s):  
C. J. Venkatakrishnan ◽  
S. Bhuminathan ◽  
Chitraa. R. Chandran

Author(s):  
Janina Golob Deeb ◽  
Anja Frantar ◽  
George R. Deeb ◽  
Caroline K. Carrico ◽  
Ksenija Rener-Sitar

The aim of this randomized in vitro study was to compare the time and accuracy of implant site preparation and implant placement using a trephine drill versus a conventional drilling technique under dynamic navigation. A total of 42 implants were placed in simulation jaw models with the two drilling techniques by two operators with previous experience with dynamic navigation. The timing of each implant placement was recorded, and horizontal, vertical, and angulation discrepancies between the planned and placed implants were compared. There was no significant difference in time or accuracy between the trephine and conventional drilling techniques. Implant site preparation with a single trephine drill using dynamic navigation was as accurate under in vitro experimental conditions as a conventional drilling sequence.


2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Scarano ◽  
F. Carinci ◽  
A. Quaranta ◽  
D. Di Iorio ◽  
B. Assenza ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document